Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 13 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Frontiers in Pharmacology

Reporting signals of selected extrapyramidal adverse events with four newer second-generation antipsychotics: a disproportionality analysis of FAERS spontaneous reports

  1. 1Department of Pharmacy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Army Medical University, Chongqing, China
  2. 2Department of Pharmacy, Shengjing Hospital, China Medical University, Shenyang, China

Abstract

Background: Newer second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) differ in pharmacology and approved indications, and extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS) remain clinically important. We investigated whether lurasidone, brexpiprazole, cariprazine, and lumateperone showed disproportionate reporting of selected EPS in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).

Methods: We conducted a retrospective pharmacovigilance signal-detection study of spontaneous reports using OpenVigil 2.1-MedDRA-v24 (FAERS Q1 2004-Q3 2025). Analyses were restricted to reports in which the target drug was the primary suspect. Narrow MedDRA sub-SMQs for Akathisia, Dyskinesia, and Dystonia and their Preferred Terms (PTs) were evaluated with the reporting odds ratio (ROR), proportional reporting ratio (PRR), and Bayesian information component (IC). Sensitivity analyses used a common calendar window (Q1 2020-Q3 2025) and the first 24 post-approval quarters for each drug.

Results: All four drugs had positive reporting signals for the three selected outcomes, and Akathisia had the largest within-drug IC025. Drug-specific PT patterns included akathisia/restlessness, tardive dyskinesia, and focal dystonia terms. The four separately calculated drug-versus-database estimates were not tested against one another and are not comparative risk estimates. All 24 estimates in the two time-window sensitivity analyses retained a lower ROR confidence bound above one and IC025 above 0, although signal magnitudes varied across windows.

Conclusion: The findings generate pharmacovigilance hypotheses for selected EPS only; they do not estimate incidence, comparative risk, or causality and should not guide preferential prescribing. Although positive signals persisted in both time-window sensitivity analyses, variation in signal magnitude, reporting behavior, differences in indication and concomitant treatment, the unexplained denominator discrepancy, and omission of Parkinson-like events require cautious interpretation and independent validation.

Related

  1. Disproportionality analysis of adverse event reporting with aspirin, statins, and their co-exposure in FAERS, 2004–2025
    Zuofeng Cao, Baojun Xie, Ping Lai +7
    Frontiers in medicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  2. Age-stratified signals and early onset of adverse events with pregabalin: a disproportionality analysis of the FDA adverse event reporting system
    Jianghai He, Yuwen Hu, Hesong Pan +8
    Frontiers in medicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  3. Comparative Effectiveness of Antidepressants and Second-Generation Antipsychotics for Agitation Among Nursing Home Residents with Dementia
    Shiwei Liang, Kate L. Lapane, Brian R. Ott +4
    Journal of General Internal MedicinePeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull textPsychiatry & mental healthPMC
  4. Infectious Complications and Toxicities of the Teclistamab Plus Daratumumab Combination in Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma: A Disproportionality and Drug–Interaction Analysis of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System
    Carmel Awadallah, Sohaib Irfan, Al-Ola Abdallah +1
    CancersPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textOncologyCrossrefEurope PMC
  5. A disproportionality analysis of adverse event reports for givinostat in the FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS) database
    Lin Chen, Hanyu Zhang, Yunlong Wang +3
    Frontiers in PharmacologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textPharmacology & toxicologyCrossrefPMC
BibTeX
@article{ma2026reporting,
  title = {{Reporting signals of selected extrapyramidal adverse events with four newer second-generation antipsychotics: a disproportionality analysis of FAERS spontaneous reports}},
  author = {Pan Ma and Qin Xiao and Yunpei Zhao and Xin Zhang and Huan Ma and Dan Chen and Linli Xie},
  journal = {Frontiers in Pharmacology},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3389/fphar.2026.1921943},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2026.1921943},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Reporting signals of selected extrapyramidal adverse events with four newer second-generation antipsychotics: a disproportionality analysis of FAERS spontaneous reports
AU  - Pan Ma
AU  - Qin Xiao
AU  - Yunpei Zhao
AU  - Xin Zhang
AU  - Huan Ma
AU  - Dan Chen
AU  - Linli Xie
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/12
JO  - Frontiers in Pharmacology
DO  - 10.3389/fphar.2026.1921943
UR  - https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2026.1921943
AB  - Background: Newer second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) differ in pharmacology and approved indications, and extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS) remain clinically important. We investigated whether lurasidone, brexpiprazole, cariprazine, and lumateperone showed disproportionate reporting of selected EPS in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).  Methods: We conducted a retrospective pharmacovigilance signal-detection study of spontaneous reports using OpenVigil 2.1-MedDRA-v24 (FAERS Q1 2004-Q3 2025). Analyses were restricted to reports in which the target drug was the primary suspect. Narrow MedDRA sub-SMQs for Akathisia, Dyskinesia, and Dystonia and their Preferred Terms (PTs) were evaluated with the reporting odds ratio (ROR), proportional reporting ratio (PRR), and Bayesian information component (IC). Sensitivity analyses used a common calendar window (Q1 2020-Q3 2025) and the first 24 post-approval quarters for each drug.  Results: All four drugs had positive reporting signals for the three selected outcomes, and Akathisia had the largest within-drug IC025. Drug-specific PT patterns included akathisia/restlessness, tardive dyskinesia, and focal dystonia terms. The four separately calculated drug-versus-database estimates were not tested against one another and are not comparative risk estimates. All 24 estimates in the two time-window sensitivity analyses retained a lower ROR confidence bound above one and IC025 above 0, although signal magnitudes varied across windows.  Conclusion: The findings generate pharmacovigilance hypotheses for selected EPS only; they do not estimate incidence, comparative risk, or causality and should not guide preferential prescribing. Although positive signals persisted in both time-window sensitivity analyses, variation in signal magnitude, reporting behavior, differences in indication and concomitant treatment, the unexplained denominator discrepancy, and omission of Parkinson-like events require cautious interpretation and independent validation.
SN  - 1663-9812
ER  -