Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
201,683 studies31 sourcesUpdated 5 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYFrontiers in public health

Heterogeneous profiles of eHealth literacy in older adults with type 2 diabetes: a latent profile analysis and associated factors

  1. 1School of Nursing, Jinzhou Medical University, Linghe , , ,

Abstract

Background: Digital diabetes services are expanding rapidly in China, and older patients’ uptake of them depends on their eHealth literacy. This construct is usually reported as a single mean score, which conceals differences between patients sharing the same total. We aimed to identify latent profiles of eHealth literacy in Chinese older adults with type 2 diabetes and the characteristics associated with profile membership.

Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted in the endocrinology departments of two tertiary hospitals in Jinzhou, Liaoning Province, between May and June 2026. Overall, 544 patients older adult(s) 60 years and over participated (mean age 71.4 ± 6.74 years, 52.21% female). Latent profile analysis was performed on the eight item-level scores of the Chinese eHealth Literacy Scale. Predictors for multinomial logistic regression were specified a priori from the Lily Model, van Dijk’s resources-and-appropriation theory and social cognitive theory, and retained regardless of univariate p -values. Multicollinearity was acceptable (VIF 1.10–1.69) and coefficients were checked against 1,000 bootstrap resamples.

Results: A three-profile solution fitted best (entropy 0.895): Skill-Dependent ( n = 309, 56.8%), Comprehensive Deficit ( n = 82, 15.1%) and Comprehensive Advancement ( n = 153, 28.1%), whose mean total scores (26.88, 17.76 and 34.72) diverged despite a sample mean of 27.71 ± 5.93. With Comprehensive Advancement as reference, older age (OR 8.50 per 10 years, 95% CI 3.45–20.94; OR 3.56, 95% CI 1.76–7.21) and greater fear of disease progression (OR 4.60 per 5 points, 95% CI 3.07–6.87; OR 1.97, 95% CI 1.46–2.67) were associated with Skill-Dependent and Comprehensive Deficit membership, respectively. Higher diabetes self-efficacy, education of high school or above, smartphone use and longer daily internet time were associated with lower odds of both lower-literacy profiles (all p < 0.001). Complications were associated with Skill-Dependent membership only (OR 6.85, 95% CI 2.04–22.95, p = 0.002).

Conclusion: eHealth literacy was distributed across three qualitatively distinct profiles, so a single mean score describes this population incompletely. Age, educational attainment, device access, daily internet time, diabetes self-efficacy and fear of disease progression were associated with profile membership. Being cross-sectional, these findings describe associations rather than causal effects; profile-tailored education needs prospective evaluation.

Related

  1. AI information literacy in healthcare context: profiles and associated variables among healthcare professionals
    Lilach Alon, Inbar Levkovich
    BMC Medical EducationPeer-reviewedCC BYFull text1 citedEpidemiology & public healthDOAJ
  2. eHealth literacy and decisional conflict in patients with coronary heart disease: chain mediation of cyberchondria and psychological inflexibility and a latent profile analysis
    Yan Huang, Tianyu She, Pei Gao +6
    Frontiers in public healthPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEpidemiology & public healthEurope PMCCrossref
  3. Beyond dementia knowledge and eHealth literacy: the influence of information sources on informal caregivers’ self-efficacy in dementia caregiving
    Yuet Lee Goh, Wan Ling Lee, Chin Hai Teo +2
    BMC GeriatricsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineDOAJ
  4. Technology acceptance, eHealth literacy, and health-related quality of life among community-dwelling older adults in urban and rural Xi’an, China: a moderated mediation study of smart eldercare technology
    Jiani Wei
    Frontiers in Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Epidemiology & public healthFrontiersCrossref
  5. eHealth literacy, digital information seeking, and health-promoting lifestyle among liver transplant recipients: a cross-sectional study
    Xiaofeng Xu, Juan Yuan, Xiuying Hu +1
    Frontiers in Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Epidemiology & public healthFrontiersCrossref
BibTeX
@article{xiao2026heterogeneous,
  title = {{Heterogeneous profiles of eHealth literacy in older adults with type 2 diabetes: a latent profile analysis and associated factors}},
  author = {Zuyao Xiao and Ruiqing Cui and Jiaxin Liu and Guohua Jing and Lingyun Wei and Yiming Yang and Shuya An and Tao Liu},
  journal = {Frontiers in public health},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3389/fpubh.2026.1927891},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/PMC13672199},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Heterogeneous profiles of eHealth literacy in older adults with type 2 diabetes: a latent profile analysis and associated factors
AU  - Zuyao Xiao
AU  - Ruiqing Cui
AU  - Jiaxin Liu
AU  - Guohua Jing
AU  - Lingyun Wei
AU  - Yiming Yang
AU  - Shuya An
AU  - Tao Liu
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/02
JO  - Frontiers in public health
DO  - 10.3389/fpubh.2026.1927891
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/PMC13672199
AB  - Background: Digital diabetes services are expanding rapidly in China, and older patients’ uptake of them depends on their eHealth literacy. This construct is usually reported as a single mean score, which conceals differences between patients sharing the same total. We aimed to identify latent profiles of eHealth literacy in Chinese older adults with type 2 diabetes and the characteristics associated with profile membership.  Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted in the endocrinology departments of two tertiary hospitals in Jinzhou, Liaoning Province, between May and June 2026. Overall, 544 patients older adult(s) 60 years and over participated (mean age 71.4 ± 6.74 years, 52.21% female). Latent profile analysis was performed on the eight item-level scores of the Chinese eHealth Literacy Scale. Predictors for multinomial logistic regression were specified a priori from the Lily Model, van Dijk’s resources-and-appropriation theory and social cognitive theory, and retained regardless of univariate p -values. Multicollinearity was acceptable (VIF 1.10–1.69) and coefficients were checked against 1,000 bootstrap resamples.  Results: A three-profile solution fitted best (entropy 0.895): Skill-Dependent ( n = 309, 56.8%), Comprehensive Deficit ( n = 82, 15.1%) and Comprehensive Advancement ( n = 153, 28.1%), whose mean total scores (26.88, 17.76 and 34.72) diverged despite a sample mean of 27.71 ± 5.93. With Comprehensive Advancement as reference, older age (OR 8.50 per 10 years, 95% CI 3.45–20.94; OR 3.56, 95% CI 1.76–7.21) and greater fear of disease progression (OR 4.60 per 5 points, 95% CI 3.07–6.87; OR 1.97, 95% CI 1.46–2.67) were associated with Skill-Dependent and Comprehensive Deficit membership, respectively. Higher diabetes self-efficacy, education of high school or above, smartphone use and longer daily internet time were associated with lower odds of both lower-literacy profiles (all p < 0.001). Complications were associated with Skill-Dependent membership only (OR 6.85, 95% CI 2.04–22.95, p = 0.002).  Conclusion: eHealth literacy was distributed across three qualitatively distinct profiles, so a single mean score describes this population incompletely. Age, educational attainment, device access, daily internet time, diabetes self-efficacy and fear of disease progression were associated with profile membership. Being cross-sectional, these findings describe associations rather than causal effects; profile-tailored education needs prospective evaluation.
SN  - 2296-2565
ER  -