Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 28 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Cancers

Is Exposure to Certain Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals Associated with Increased Skin Cancer Risk?

  1. 1Department of Endocrinology and Diabetes, University Hospital of Heraklion, 71110 Crete, Greece
  2. 22nd Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Medical School, “Attikon” General University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Rimini 1, Haidari, 12461 Athens, Greece

Abstract

Background/Objectives: This review investigated whether exposure to certain endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs) increases skin cancer risk. Methods: We performed a comprehensive narrative review of in vitro, animal, and human studies examining the association of EDCs with melanoma and non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC). Results: Chemicals are classified as (i) established EDCs with evidence of skin carcinogenicity; (ii) chemicals that are carcinogenic with endocrine-related effects; and (iii) chemicals with limited or uncertain evidence. Proposed carcinogenic mechanisms include oxidative stress, chronic inflammation, immunosuppression, DNA repair inhibition, and epigenetic alterations; AhR likely mediates the carcinogenicity of dioxin (TCDD), dioxin-like PCBs, and PAHs. Epidemiological evidence linking PCBs with melanoma is inconsistent. High cumulative occupational exposure to PAH-containing mineral oils or tar/pitch increases skin cancer risk. Evidence for PFAS and skin cancer is limited and inconsistent. Increased melanoma incidence has been reported after chronic occupational exposure to certain pesticides, including carbaryl, parathion, and maneb/mancozeb. There is substantial evidence of a dose–response association between chronic arsenic exposure and NMSC risk. Conclusions: High chronic exposure to specific EDCs (especially arsenic, certain PAHs, and certain pesticides) may increase skin cancer risk. For several chemicals, evidence supports carcinogenicity with endocrine-related effects, but direct mechanistic evidence that endocrine disruption specifically mediates skin carcinogenesis is lacking.

Related

  1. Endocrine-disrupting chemicals in male reproductive health: exposure risks, reproductive toxicity and emerging perspectives.
    Dongyue Ma, Qingjiang Yang, Jun Guo +3
    Frontiers in endocrinologyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textPharmacology & toxicologyEurope PMCCrossref
  2. Gestational Exposure to Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals and Small Vulnerable Newborns: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Guoqi Yu, Xi Meng, Yue Qian Tan +8
    Environmental science & technologyPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textPharmacology & toxicologyEurope PMC
  3. Implications of Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals for Human Health and Effective Methods for Prevention and Reduction
    Codruța-Claudia Gherman-Lencu, Teodora Alexescu, Cristian Muresanu +3
    ToxicsPeer-reviewedCC BY5 citedPharmacology & toxicologyOpenAlex
  4. Exposomic Assessment of Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals Using Hair: A Cross-Matrix Comparison with Serum and Urine by LC-HRMS and Metabolite Profiling.
    Ana González-Ruiz, Adrià Sunyer-Caldú, Rodrigo Braz Carneiro +7
    Environmental science & technologyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull text1 citedPharmacology & toxicologyEurope PMC
  5. Testing for the presence of Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals in Locally Available Perfumes in Pakistan Through GC-MS Analysis and Implications for Public Health Policy
    Mehrbano Hussain, Muhammad Hammad Khan
    ChemRxivPreprintCC BY-NCFull textPharmacology & toxicologyChemRxiv
BibTeX
@article{betsi2026exposure,
  title = {{Is Exposure to Certain Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals Associated with Increased Skin Cancer Risk?}},
  author = {Grigoria Betsi and Dimitra Koumaki and Anastasia Kountouri and Paraskevi Xekouki},
  journal = {Cancers},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3390/cancers18203283},
  url = {https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/18/20/3283},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Is Exposure to Certain Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals Associated with Increased Skin Cancer Risk?
AU  - Grigoria Betsi
AU  - Dimitra Koumaki
AU  - Anastasia Kountouri
AU  - Paraskevi Xekouki
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/01
JO  - Cancers
DO  - 10.3390/cancers18203283
UR  - https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/18/20/3283
AB  - Background/Objectives: This review investigated whether exposure to certain endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs) increases skin cancer risk. Methods: We performed a comprehensive narrative review of in vitro, animal, and human studies examining the association of EDCs with melanoma and non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC). Results: Chemicals are classified as (i) established EDCs with evidence of skin carcinogenicity; (ii) chemicals that are carcinogenic with endocrine-related effects; and (iii) chemicals with limited or uncertain evidence. Proposed carcinogenic mechanisms include oxidative stress, chronic inflammation, immunosuppression, DNA repair inhibition, and epigenetic alterations; AhR likely mediates the carcinogenicity of dioxin (TCDD), dioxin-like PCBs, and PAHs. Epidemiological evidence linking PCBs with melanoma is inconsistent. High cumulative occupational exposure to PAH-containing mineral oils or tar/pitch increases skin cancer risk. Evidence for PFAS and skin cancer is limited and inconsistent. Increased melanoma incidence has been reported after chronic occupational exposure to certain pesticides, including carbaryl, parathion, and maneb/mancozeb. There is substantial evidence of a dose–response association between chronic arsenic exposure and NMSC risk. Conclusions: High chronic exposure to specific EDCs (especially arsenic, certain PAHs, and certain pesticides) may increase skin cancer risk. For several chemicals, evidence supports carcinogenicity with endocrine-related effects, but direct mechanistic evidence that endocrine disruption specifically mediates skin carcinogenesis is lacking.
SN  - 2072-6694
ER  -