Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 46 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Journal of Clinical Medicine

Medication-Documented Systemic Anticancer Treatment in Colorectal Cancer: A Single-Centre Routine-Data Study

  1. 1Doctoral School, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, 200349 Craiova, Romania
  2. 2Faculty of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, 200349 Craiova, Romania
  3. 3Research Centre for Gastroenterology and Hepatology,200349, Craiova, Romania

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Real-world colorectal cancer (CRC) treatment is documented across multiple routine hospital data domains, which complicates interpretation of treatment-pattern studies. We characterised medication-documented systemic anticancer treatment patterns in CRC and evaluated the consistency of the routine data sources used to ascertain them. Methods: This retrospective observational study included 1310 encounters from 627 patients with C18—C20 diagnosis codes from 1 March to 30 April 2026. Semicolon-delimited medication entries were normalised to named agents. Patient-level medication-derived treatment patterns were characterised among 54 patients with at least one named antineoplastic documented during the fixed study window, without assuming representativeness of the full CRC-coded cohort; oral prescriptions were analysed separately as complementary evidence. Results: Twenty patients (37.0%) had cytotoxic component(s) only, 20 (37.0%) targeted/immune-checkpoint-inhibitor (ICI) plus cytotoxic components, 12 (22.2%) targeted/ICI components without cytotoxic co-documentation, and 2 (3.7%) other antineoplastic agents only. At the first treatment-documented encounter, 24/54 (44.4%) had at least two named antineoplastic agents co-documented. Thirty-three patients (61.1%) had medication-positive treatment documentation in at least two encounters, and 30/33 (90.9%) had the same documented class set across these encounters. Procedure- and medication-based indicators agreed in 890/891 interpretable encounters (99.89%; Cohen’s kappa 0.9953, 95% CI 0.9839–1.0000). Conclusions: Routine hospital medication data showed heterogeneous medication patterns among CRC-coded patients, frequently with multi-component and repeated documentation. Procedure and medication indicators share a hospital workflow; their near-complete concordance describes internal consistency and cannot exclude joint under-capture or establish clinical accuracy or treatment appropriateness.

Related

  1. Hepatitis B virus reactivation in patients with solid tumors receiving systemic anticancer treatment
    C.S. Voican, O. Mir, P. Loulergue +6
    Annals of OncologyPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull text68 citedEpidemiology & public healthHAL
  2. FOLFOX-HAIC plus regorafenib for the treatment of unresectable colorectal liver metastases refractory to first and second-line systemic chemotherapy
    Jiacheng Liu, Songlin Song, Wei Yao +4
    BMC CancerPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textOncologyDOAJ
  3. Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw in cancer and osteoporosis patients: a retrospective seven-year single-center Norwegian cohort study of clinical profiles and documented soft tissue healing.
    Safiyye Süslü, Håvard J Haugen, Tormod B Krüger +2
    Acta odontologica ScandinavicaPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textOncologyEurope PMC
  4. Documented Dry Eye Disease in Patients Receiving Topical Antiglaucoma Therapy: Associations with Treatment Characteristics
    Marija Jelić Vuković, Ena Kolak, Dubravka Biuk +7
    BiomedicinesPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  5. Travel distance to tertiary healthcare reflects disease severity and medication access in Italian systemic sclerosis patients: a geographical study on adult-onset rare diseases from SPRING-SIR registry
    Enrico De Lorenzis, Gerlando Natalello, Rossella De Angelis +75
    BMC Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Epidemiology & public healthCrossref
BibTeX
@article{vieru2026medicationdocumented,
  title = {{Medication-Documented Systemic Anticancer Treatment in Colorectal Cancer: A Single-Centre Routine-Data Study}},
  author = {Alexandru-Marian Vieru and Radu Meșină and Virginia-Maria Rădulescu and Emil-Tiberius Trașcă and Sergiu-Marian Cazacu and Maria-Lorena Mustață and Daniela-Maria Micu and Tudor-Adrian Bălșeanu and Petrică Popa and Tudorel Ciurea},
  journal = {Journal of Clinical Medicine},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3390/jcm15218486},
  url = {https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/15/21/8486},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Medication-Documented Systemic Anticancer Treatment in Colorectal Cancer: A Single-Centre Routine-Data Study
AU  - Alexandru-Marian Vieru
AU  - Radu Meșină
AU  - Virginia-Maria Rădulescu
AU  - Emil-Tiberius Trașcă
AU  - Sergiu-Marian Cazacu
AU  - Maria-Lorena Mustață
AU  - Daniela-Maria Micu
AU  - Tudor-Adrian Bălșeanu
AU  - Petrică Popa
AU  - Tudorel Ciurea
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/31
JO  - Journal of Clinical Medicine
DO  - 10.3390/jcm15218486
UR  - https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/15/21/8486
AB  - Background/Objectives: Real-world colorectal cancer (CRC) treatment is documented across multiple routine hospital data domains, which complicates interpretation of treatment-pattern studies. We characterised medication-documented systemic anticancer treatment patterns in CRC and evaluated the consistency of the routine data sources used to ascertain them. Methods: This retrospective observational study included 1310 encounters from 627 patients with C18—C20 diagnosis codes from 1 March to 30 April 2026. Semicolon-delimited medication entries were normalised to named agents. Patient-level medication-derived treatment patterns were characterised among 54 patients with at least one named antineoplastic documented during the fixed study window, without assuming representativeness of the full CRC-coded cohort; oral prescriptions were analysed separately as complementary evidence. Results: Twenty patients (37.0%) had cytotoxic component(s) only, 20 (37.0%) targeted/immune-checkpoint-inhibitor (ICI) plus cytotoxic components, 12 (22.2%) targeted/ICI components without cytotoxic co-documentation, and 2 (3.7%) other antineoplastic agents only. At the first treatment-documented encounter, 24/54 (44.4%) had at least two named antineoplastic agents co-documented. Thirty-three patients (61.1%) had medication-positive treatment documentation in at least two encounters, and 30/33 (90.9%) had the same documented class set across these encounters. Procedure- and medication-based indicators agreed in 890/891 interpretable encounters (99.89%; Cohen’s kappa 0.9953, 95% CI 0.9839–1.0000). Conclusions: Routine hospital medication data showed heterogeneous medication patterns among CRC-coded patients, frequently with multi-component and repeated documentation. Procedure and medication indicators share a hospital workflow; their near-complete concordance describes internal consistency and cannot exclude joint under-capture or establish clinical accuracy or treatment appropriateness.
SN  - 2077-0383
ER  -