Brain Clearance of Contrast Agent in Intravenous DCE ‐ MRI Is Measurable and Cannot Be Explained by Clearance Across the BBB Alone
Abstract
Purpose To determine the feasibility of measuring brain clearance of gadolinium contrast agent using standard intravenous DCE‐MRI acquisitions and evaluate the contribution of blood–brain barrier (BBB) and non‐BBB clearance routes. Methods Uptake and extended Tofts models were fit to DCE‐MRI data from people with Parkinson's disease, post‐stroke and controls. Models were compared using the Akaike information criterion. Key parameters ( K trans , v p , v e , and k ) were extracted from gray and white matter ROIs. In mice, two‐photon microscopy of intravenously injected Sulforhodamine 101 was used to confirm small tracer clearance kinetics without the confounds of partial volume effects or water exchange. Results The extended Tofts model provided a superior fit compared to all uptake‐only models. Extended Tofts estimates of the extravascular extracellular volume fraction v e were underestimated by a factor of 10–20 compared to known literature values (1.5% vs. 20%–30%). We hypothesized this bias may be due to an additional competing non‐BBB clearance mechanism not accounted for by the extended Tofts model. In both MRI and two‐photon data, we found that v e estimates trended toward literature values as BBB permeability (and thus BBB clearance) increased, supporting our hypothesis. Conclusion Modeling clearance of extravasated contrast agent from the brain improves fit quality compared to models that neglect clearance. Estimates of interstitial volume fraction were underestimated at low K trans but tended toward literature values as BBB permeability (and clearance) increased. This study indicates that estimating brain clearance of contrast agent using DCE‐MRI is feasible, and that estimates reflect a combination of BBB and non‐BBB clearance pathways.
Related
- Brain Gadolinium Biodistribution, Clearance, and Retention Following High-Dose Contrast-Agent Exposure in Mice: A Multimodal Study
- Gpnmb-positive lipid-associated macrophages contribute to lipid clearance during luteolysis
- Toward selective amyloid clearance through rational nanomedicine design
- SQSTM1/p62-LC3A–mediated autophagic clearance of stress granules prevents apoptosis under hyperosmotic stress
- Seconds-resolved in vivo measurements reveal rapid, serotonin transporter–independent plasma serotonin clearance
BibTeX
@article{kozar2026brain,
title = {{Brain Clearance of Contrast Agent in Intravenous DCE ‐ MRI Is Measurable and Cannot Be Explained by Clearance Across the BBB Alone}},
author = {Martin Kozár and Ioana‐emilia Mosneag and Sarah Al-Bachari and Igor Chernyavsky and Geoff Parker and Hervé Boutin and Laura Parkes and Ingo Schiessl and Ben Dickie},
journal = {Magnetic Resonance in Medicine},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.1002/mrm.70514},
url = {https://inserm.hal.science/inserm-05749708v1},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Brain Clearance of Contrast Agent in Intravenous DCE ‐ MRI Is Measurable and Cannot Be Explained by Clearance Across the BBB Alone
AU - Martin Kozár
AU - Ioana‐emilia Mosneag
AU - Sarah Al-Bachari
AU - Igor Chernyavsky
AU - Geoff Parker
AU - Hervé Boutin
AU - Laura Parkes
AU - Ingo Schiessl
AU - Ben Dickie
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/14
JO - Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
DO - 10.1002/mrm.70514
UR - https://inserm.hal.science/inserm-05749708v1
AB - Purpose To determine the feasibility of measuring brain clearance of gadolinium contrast agent using standard intravenous DCE‐MRI acquisitions and evaluate the contribution of blood–brain barrier (BBB) and non‐BBB clearance routes. Methods Uptake and extended Tofts models were fit to DCE‐MRI data from people with Parkinson's disease, post‐stroke and controls. Models were compared using the Akaike information criterion. Key parameters ( K trans , v p , v e , and k ) were extracted from gray and white matter ROIs. In mice, two‐photon microscopy of intravenously injected Sulforhodamine 101 was used to confirm small tracer clearance kinetics without the confounds of partial volume effects or water exchange. Results The extended Tofts model provided a superior fit compared to all uptake‐only models. Extended Tofts estimates of the extravascular extracellular volume fraction v e were underestimated by a factor of 10–20 compared to known literature values (1.5% vs. 20%–30%). We hypothesized this bias may be due to an additional competing non‐BBB clearance mechanism not accounted for by the extended Tofts model. In both MRI and two‐photon data, we found that v e estimates trended toward literature values as BBB permeability (and thus BBB clearance) increased, supporting our hypothesis. Conclusion Modeling clearance of extravasated contrast agent from the brain improves fit quality compared to models that neglect clearance. Estimates of interstitial volume fraction were underestimated at low K trans but tended toward literature values as BBB permeability (and clearance) increased. This study indicates that estimating brain clearance of contrast agent using DCE‐MRI is feasible, and that estimates reflect a combination of BBB and non‐BBB clearance pathways.
SN - 0740-3194
SN - 1522-2594
ER -