Exploring the types of approaches used by community food organisations and their role in food insecurity prevention: a mixed-methods study
6 affiliations
- 1Hull York Medical School, University of York, York, UK
- 2Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
- 3Social Research Institute, University College London, London, UK
- 4Department of Public Health, Environments and Society, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine Centre of Global Change and Health, London, UK
- 5School for Business and Society, University of York, York, UK
- 6School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester - The Victoria University of Manchester Campus, Manchester, UK
Abstract
Objectives: Community food organisations are local food infrastructures that respond to household food insecurity (though they may be nationally managed). They are diverse in their approaches and include, among others, emergency food distribution, food pantries, community kitchens and food banks. Many provide additional support, including welfare advice, employment support, food vouchers and signposting to helpful resources. We investigated what approaches used by community food (aid) organisations are most likely to help prevent the need for emergency food for families in two multicultural areas in the North and South of England.
Design: A longitudinal mixed-method research programme, including systems mapping, survey and workshops, semi-structured qualitative interviews and a multiple-method longitudinal qualitative study (ethnography, go-along interviews and visual study).
Setting: Community settings, including ethnographies in nine community food organisations across two local government areas. Data collection took place from July 2023 to July 2025.
Participants: 89 community food organisations and ~160 representatives took part across work packages, including workshops (n=82 local/national representatives), survey (n=89 organisations), ethnography (n=9 organisations); interviews (n=36 funders, coordinators, managers and volunteers); longitudinal interviews (n=40 families with lived experience of food insecurity) and visual study (n=36 families).
Results: Community food organisations are part of a complex, fragile food system, with high dependency on surplus food, volunteers and external funding. Although many aim to address underlying issues, food insecurity prevention is often not possible in practice, largely due to operational tensions (space, capacity and funding constraints) and wider financial and political constraints
Conclusions: No single model of delivery within community food organisations appears more effective at preventing the need for emergency food. Instead, sufficient space, time and resources to address underlying needs and staff approachability are most likely to make a difference. However, any influence organisations play to reduce food insecurity would be minimal without tackling poverty as an underlying cause.
Related
- Multiregional characterisation of collaboration between clinical and community-based organisations for postpartum transition care delivery: A mixed methods study protocol.
- Food Insecurity Among Patients with Chronic Pain in an Urban Slum of Delhi: A Community-Based Cross-Sectional Study
- Editorial: Exploring socio-cultural factors in human nutrition: the importance of multidimensional approaches
- Evaluating Novel Healthcare Approaches to Nurturing and Caring for Hospitalised Elders (ENHANCE): protocol for a stepped wedge, cluster randomised clinical trial for delirium prevention in older adults
- Practical Approaches to Nutritional Interventions for Malnutrition, Sarcopenia, and Frailty in Community-Dwelling Older Adults and Care Home Populations: A Narrative Review
BibTeX
@article{bryant2026exploring,
title = {{Exploring the types of approaches used by community food organisations and their role in food insecurity prevention: a mixed-methods study}},
author = {Maria Bryant and Giorgia Previdoli and Rachel Benchekroun and Wendy Burton and Maddy Power and Philip Hadley and Ariadne Kapetanaki and Bob Doherty and Claire Cameron and Kate Pickett and Laura Sheard},
journal = {BMJ Open},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.1136/bmjopen-2026-122055},
url = {https://bmjopen.bmj.com/lookup/doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-122055},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Exploring the types of approaches used by community food organisations and their role in food insecurity prevention: a mixed-methods study
AU - Maria Bryant
AU - Giorgia Previdoli
AU - Rachel Benchekroun
AU - Wendy Burton
AU - Maddy Power
AU - Philip Hadley
AU - Ariadne Kapetanaki
AU - Bob Doherty
AU - Claire Cameron
AU - Kate Pickett
AU - Laura Sheard
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/22
JO - BMJ Open
DO - 10.1136/bmjopen-2026-122055
UR - https://bmjopen.bmj.com/lookup/doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-122055
AB - Objectives: Community food organisations are local food infrastructures that respond to household food insecurity (though they may be nationally managed). They are diverse in their approaches and include, among others, emergency food distribution, food pantries, community kitchens and food banks. Many provide additional support, including welfare advice, employment support, food vouchers and signposting to helpful resources. We investigated what approaches used by community food (aid) organisations are most likely to help prevent the need for emergency food for families in two multicultural areas in the North and South of England. Design: A longitudinal mixed-method research programme, including systems mapping, survey and workshops, semi-structured qualitative interviews and a multiple-method longitudinal qualitative study (ethnography, go-along interviews and visual study). Setting: Community settings, including ethnographies in nine community food organisations across two local government areas. Data collection took place from July 2023 to July 2025. Participants: 89 community food organisations and ~160 representatives took part across work packages, including workshops (n=82 local/national representatives), survey (n=89 organisations), ethnography (n=9 organisations); interviews (n=36 funders, coordinators, managers and volunteers); longitudinal interviews (n=40 families with lived experience of food insecurity) and visual study (n=36 families). Results: Community food organisations are part of a complex, fragile food system, with high dependency on surplus food, volunteers and external funding. Although many aim to address underlying issues, food insecurity prevention is often not possible in practice, largely due to operational tensions (space, capacity and funding constraints) and wider financial and political constraints Conclusions: No single model of delivery within community food organisations appears more effective at preventing the need for emergency food. Instead, sufficient space, time and resources to address underlying needs and staff approachability are most likely to make a difference. However, any influence organisations play to reduce food insecurity would be minimal without tackling poverty as an underlying cause.
SN - 2044-6055
SN - 2044-6055
ER -