Association of a structured perioperative nursing intervention pathway with recovery and psychological outcomes in patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery: a non-concurrent controlled study : Author.
- 1Department of Spine Surgery, the Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, 050051, China.
- 2Department of Spine Surgery, the Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, 050051, China. [email protected].
Abstract
Background
Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (DLSS) is a common condition associated with pain, functional limitation, and psychological distress. Although lumbar fusion surgery can relieve symptoms, postoperative recovery may be influenced by perioperative nursing care. This study aimed to evaluate the association between a structured perioperative nursing intervention pathway and recovery and psychological outcomes in patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery.Methods
The final complete-case analysis of this non-concurrent single-center study included 140 patients with DLSS who underwent posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) or transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). Patients admitted from May to August 2024 were assigned to the control group (n = 70) and received routine nursing care, whereas those admitted from September 2024 to April 2025 were assigned to the intervention group (n = 70) and received a structured perioperative nursing intervention in addition to routine care. Clinical outcomes, including pain assessed by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), functional disability assessed by the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and psychological status assessed by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), were evaluated preoperatively, on postoperative day 3 (POD3), at discharge, and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. The primary outcome was VAS pain score at discharge, whereas other time-specific comparisons of VAS, ODI, HADS-A, and HADS-D were considered exploratory. No formal adjustment for multiple comparisons was applied to these exploratory time-specific analyses.Results
Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were comparable between groups. The intervention group had a shorter length of hospital stay than the control group (10.26 ± 4.86 vs. 12.31 ± 4.25 days, P = 0.009). At POD3, no between-group differences were observed in VAS, ODI, HADS-A, or HADS-D scores. For the prespecified primary outcome, the intervention group had a lower VAS score at discharge (3.57 ± 2.12 vs. 4.74 ± 2.42, P = 0.003). Exploratory unadjusted analyses showed selected between-group differences in functional and psychological scores during the first 6 postoperative months; these findings should be interpreted cautiously because no multiplicity adjustment was applied.Conclusions
In this single-center, non-randomized, non-concurrent controlled study, the structured perioperative nursing intervention pathway was associated with a lower VAS pain score at the clinically defined discharge time point. Exploratory analyses suggested possible favorable functional and psychological trajectories at selected mid-term follow-up points; however, these findings should be considered hypothesis-generating because of the sequential cohort design and multiple unadjusted comparisons. Further prospective randomized studies are needed to confirm these associations.
Related
- Evidence-Based Nursing Combined With Structured Psychological Intervention for Perioperative Anxiety in Tubal Ectopic Pregnancy: A Randomized Controlled Trial
- Association between Perioperative Blood Glucose Levels and Wound Complications in Diabetic Patients Undergoing Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study
- Association Between Admission Calculated Serum Osmolality and New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation in Patients with Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
- Sequential patient-spouse dyadic psychological intervention for perioperative emotional distress and dyadic coping in patients with spinal metastases.
- Association of a structured nutrition-centred multidisciplinary supportive-care program with treatment tolerance and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing precision radiotherapy for head and neck cancer: a prospective cohort study
BibTeX
@article{song2026association,
title = {{Association of a structured perioperative nursing intervention pathway with recovery and psychological outcomes in patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery: a non-concurrent controlled study : Author.}},
author = {Xinyan Song and Ruiling Wang and Jia Ding},
journal = {Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research},
year = {2026},
month = aug,
doi = {10.1186/s13018-026-07128-0},
url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42958305},
note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Association of a structured perioperative nursing intervention pathway with recovery and psychological outcomes in patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery: a non-concurrent controlled study : Author.
AU - Xinyan Song
AU - Ruiling Wang
AU - Jia Ding
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/08/03
JO - Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research
DO - 10.1186/s13018-026-07128-0
UR - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42958305
AB - Background Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (DLSS) is a common condition associated with pain, functional limitation, and psychological distress. Although lumbar fusion surgery can relieve symptoms, postoperative recovery may be influenced by perioperative nursing care. This study aimed to evaluate the association between a structured perioperative nursing intervention pathway and recovery and psychological outcomes in patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery.Methods The final complete-case analysis of this non-concurrent single-center study included 140 patients with DLSS who underwent posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) or transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). Patients admitted from May to August 2024 were assigned to the control group (n = 70) and received routine nursing care, whereas those admitted from September 2024 to April 2025 were assigned to the intervention group (n = 70) and received a structured perioperative nursing intervention in addition to routine care. Clinical outcomes, including pain assessed by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), functional disability assessed by the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and psychological status assessed by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), were evaluated preoperatively, on postoperative day 3 (POD3), at discharge, and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. The primary outcome was VAS pain score at discharge, whereas other time-specific comparisons of VAS, ODI, HADS-A, and HADS-D were considered exploratory. No formal adjustment for multiple comparisons was applied to these exploratory time-specific analyses.Results Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were comparable between groups. The intervention group had a shorter length of hospital stay than the control group (10.26 ± 4.86 vs. 12.31 ± 4.25 days, P = 0.009). At POD3, no between-group differences were observed in VAS, ODI, HADS-A, or HADS-D scores. For the prespecified primary outcome, the intervention group had a lower VAS score at discharge (3.57 ± 2.12 vs. 4.74 ± 2.42, P = 0.003). Exploratory unadjusted analyses showed selected between-group differences in functional and psychological scores during the first 6 postoperative months; these findings should be interpreted cautiously because no multiplicity adjustment was applied.Conclusions In this single-center, non-randomized, non-concurrent controlled study, the structured perioperative nursing intervention pathway was associated with a lower VAS pain score at the clinically defined discharge time point. Exploratory analyses suggested possible favorable functional and psychological trajectories at selected mid-term follow-up points; however, these findings should be considered hypothesis-generating because of the sequential cohort design and multiple unadjusted comparisons. Further prospective randomized studies are needed to confirm these associations.
SN - 1749-799X
ER -