Sequential patient-spouse dyadic psychological intervention for perioperative emotional distress and dyadic coping in patients with spinal metastases.
- 1Weifang People's Hospital, Weifang, China.
- 2The 80th Group Army Hospital of the Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA), Weifang, China.
- 3Weifang Eye Hospital, National Key Clinical Specialty, Zhengda Guangming Eye Group, Weifang, China.
Abstract
Purpose
To evaluate the effects of a sequential patient-spouse dyadic psychological intervention on perioperative emotional distress, dyadic coping, and spouse caregiving burden in patients undergoing surgery for spinal metastases.Methods
Patients with spinal metastases undergoing surgical treatment and their spouses were recruited in this single-center, prospective randomized controlled trial. A total of 88 patient-spouse dyads were randomly assigned to the intervention group or the control group at a 1:1 ratio. Patient emotional distress measured using the Distress Thermometer (DT) was the primary outcome. Spouse DT, patient and spouse Dyadic Coping Inventory (DCI) scores, and spouse Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI) scores were secondary outcomes. T0 was treated as the baseline covariate, and postbaseline outcomes were analyzed using baseline-adjusted linear mixed-effects models. A supplementary dyad-aware mixed model jointly modeled patient and spouse outcomes to account for within-dyad dependence.Results
A total of 88 dyads (44 per group) were included in the analysis. For the primary outcome, patient DT scores were lower in the intervention group across the postoperative assessment period (adjusted average difference, -0.46; 95% CI, -0.79 to -0.12; Wald χ² = 7.05; p = 0.008), although the patient-specific group-by-time interaction was not significant (p = 0.125). At 2 weeks after discharge, the adjusted patient DT difference was -0.71 (95% CI, -1.17 to -0.24; Holm-adjusted p = 0.009; Hedges' g = -0.67, 95% CI, -1.10 to -0.24). Spouse DT scores were also lower overall (adjusted average difference, -0.62; 95% CI, -0.92 to -0.32; p < 0.001), with a standardized difference at 2 weeks of g = -0.79 (95% CI, -1.23 to -0.36). In the joint dyad-aware DT model, the group-by-time interaction was significant (Wald χ² = 7.49, df = 2, p = 0.024), whereas the group-by-role-by-time interaction was not (p = 0.988). Patient and spouse DCI scores were higher overall in the intervention group (adjusted average differences, 5.50 and 3.33 points, respectively), but their role-specific group-by-time interactions were not significant. Spouse ZBI scores were lower overall in the intervention group (adjusted average difference, -3.24; 95% CI, -5.28 to -1.20; p = 0.002), without a significant group-by-time interaction.Conclusion
The sequential patient-spouse dyadic psychological intervention was associated with modestly lower emotional distress and higher dyadic coping during the later perioperative period. The findings were strongest for distress at the post-discharge assessment, but mean DT scores remained above the clinical screening threshold in both groups. These results support further evaluation of structured dyadic psychosocial care with longer follow-up and dyad-focused analyses rather than immediate broad implementation.
Related
- Evidence-Based Nursing Combined With Structured Psychological Intervention for Perioperative Anxiety in Tubal Ectopic Pregnancy: A Randomized Controlled Trial
- A school-based trauma-informed care and social-emotional learning intervention for adolescents with adverse childhood experiences in India: Protocol for a sequential mixed-methods study with a single-arm quasi-experimental evaluation
- From caregiver burden to psychological resilience and positive emotional outcomes: the effectiveness of innovative psychiatric nursing intervention among family caregivers of patients with bipolar disorder.
- Association of a structured perioperative nursing intervention pathway with recovery and psychological outcomes in patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery: a non-concurrent controlled study : Author.
- Delayed sequential lung, acral cutaneous and brain metastases after radical nephrectomy for clear cell renal cell carcinoma: a case report
BibTeX
@article{xie2026sequential,
title = {{Sequential patient-spouse dyadic psychological intervention for perioperative emotional distress and dyadic coping in patients with spinal metastases.}},
author = {Liping Xie and Yunli Wang and Zhixiao Wang and Zeping Shao and Xiaoqing Han and Hui Xu and Dengxing Lun and Yating Wen and Yan Chen and Yingshu Yang and Baochang Ding and Xin Pan},
journal = {Frontiers in public health},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.3389/fpubh.2026.1930615},
url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42908817},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Sequential patient-spouse dyadic psychological intervention for perioperative emotional distress and dyadic coping in patients with spinal metastases.
AU - Liping Xie
AU - Yunli Wang
AU - Zhixiao Wang
AU - Zeping Shao
AU - Xiaoqing Han
AU - Hui Xu
AU - Dengxing Lun
AU - Yating Wen
AU - Yan Chen
AU - Yingshu Yang
AU - Baochang Ding
AU - Xin Pan
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/07
JO - Frontiers in public health
DO - 10.3389/fpubh.2026.1930615
UR - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42908817
AB - Purpose To evaluate the effects of a sequential patient-spouse dyadic psychological intervention on perioperative emotional distress, dyadic coping, and spouse caregiving burden in patients undergoing surgery for spinal metastases.Methods Patients with spinal metastases undergoing surgical treatment and their spouses were recruited in this single-center, prospective randomized controlled trial. A total of 88 patient-spouse dyads were randomly assigned to the intervention group or the control group at a 1:1 ratio. Patient emotional distress measured using the Distress Thermometer (DT) was the primary outcome. Spouse DT, patient and spouse Dyadic Coping Inventory (DCI) scores, and spouse Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI) scores were secondary outcomes. T0 was treated as the baseline covariate, and postbaseline outcomes were analyzed using baseline-adjusted linear mixed-effects models. A supplementary dyad-aware mixed model jointly modeled patient and spouse outcomes to account for within-dyad dependence.Results A total of 88 dyads (44 per group) were included in the analysis. For the primary outcome, patient DT scores were lower in the intervention group across the postoperative assessment period (adjusted average difference, -0.46; 95% CI, -0.79 to -0.12; Wald χ² = 7.05; p = 0.008), although the patient-specific group-by-time interaction was not significant (p = 0.125). At 2 weeks after discharge, the adjusted patient DT difference was -0.71 (95% CI, -1.17 to -0.24; Holm-adjusted p = 0.009; Hedges' g = -0.67, 95% CI, -1.10 to -0.24). Spouse DT scores were also lower overall (adjusted average difference, -0.62; 95% CI, -0.92 to -0.32; p < 0.001), with a standardized difference at 2 weeks of g = -0.79 (95% CI, -1.23 to -0.36). In the joint dyad-aware DT model, the group-by-time interaction was significant (Wald χ² = 7.49, df = 2, p = 0.024), whereas the group-by-role-by-time interaction was not (p = 0.988). Patient and spouse DCI scores were higher overall in the intervention group (adjusted average differences, 5.50 and 3.33 points, respectively), but their role-specific group-by-time interactions were not significant. Spouse ZBI scores were lower overall in the intervention group (adjusted average difference, -3.24; 95% CI, -5.28 to -1.20; p = 0.002), without a significant group-by-time interaction.Conclusion The sequential patient-spouse dyadic psychological intervention was associated with modestly lower emotional distress and higher dyadic coping during the later perioperative period. The findings were strongest for distress at the post-discharge assessment, but mean DT scores remained above the clinical screening threshold in both groups. These results support further evaluation of structured dyadic psychosocial care with longer follow-up and dyad-focused analyses rather than immediate broad implementation.
SN - 2296-2565
ER -