Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,787 studies31 sourcesUpdated 2 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYPolymers

Moisture Preparation and Bending Performance of Metal Plate Connected C24 Spruce Members in an Exploratory Comparison of Two Connector Systems

  1. 1Department of Mechanical Wood Technology, Poznań University of Life Sciences, 60-637 Poznań, Poland
  2. 2SODRA POLSKA sp. z o.o., Gdyńska 15A, 62-028 Koziegłowy, Poland
  3. 3Department of Materials Strength and Structural Diagnostics, Kielce University of Technology, 25-314 Kielce, Poland

Abstract

Moisture preparation, moisture at testing, and timber variability can jointly influence the response of metal-plate-connected (MPC) members. This exploratory re-analysis concerns 18 C24 Norway spruce assemblies (45 × 170 mm) with Mitek T150 or Ristek LL13 plates. The principal comparison includes 14 directly conditioned specimens in nominal 15%, 20%, and 40% preparation groups, with only two or three beams per connector–group cell; four moisture-transition specimens are described separately. Pooled mean ultimate loads were 14.15, 11.41, and 10.22 kN, respectively. An additive model summarized a nominal-group association (F(2,10) ≈ 12.29, p ≈ 0.002; bias-reduced, nonpartial ω2 ≈ 0.587), but this estimate remains uncertain in such a small sample. The connector comparison was inconclusive (p ≈ 0.122), rather than evidence of equivalent performance. In the nominal 40% group, reported mean moisture differed substantially between Mitek and Ristek (40.45% and 26.35%), and resistance-meter readings in the wet range lack documented validation. Separate verified moisture records at pressing and testing, and the timber-allocation procedure, are not documented. Consequently, preparation history, test-state moisture, connector system, and possible timber-batch differences cannot be separated causally. Laboratory coupons were summarized at the parent-beam level, without treating subsamples as independent treatment replicates. The findings identify associations requiring a balanced, replicated experiment; they do not establish an assembly-moisture effect, a connector ranking, or a design reduction factor.

Related

  1. [2+4]型手性多孔有机笼Pim高效液相色谱固定相的制备及其手性拆分性能评价 Preparation and chiral separation performance evaluation of a high performance liquid chromatography stationary phase based on a [2+4]-type chiral porous organic cage Pim
    Se pu = Chinese journal of chromatographyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral chemistryEurope PMC
  2. Preparation of Membrane Evaporators and Solar Interfacial Water Evaporation Performance Study
    Haonan Fang, Lianqing Yu
    ACS OmegaPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textGeneral chemistryCrossrefEurope PMCEurope PMCPMC
  3. Influence of positional isomerism and connector nature on the optical properties of benzothiadiazole-based push-pull chromophores
    Jean-Elie Zheng, Margot Boujut, Rayan Hachem +2
    Dyes and PigmentsPeer-reviewedCC BYPhysical chemistryHAL
  4. Cross-Platform Evaluation Reveals Sample Preparation-Driven Biological Biases despite Advances in Mass Spectrometry Performance in Serum Proteomics.
    Drosos Katsavelis, Marieke G C van der Hart, Justina C Wolters +3
    Journal of proteome researchPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textPhysical chemistryEurope PMC
  5. Preliminary Synthesis and Basic Performance Characterization of Bio-Based Composite Materials Using Starch and Gelatin as Representative Matrix Phases: Exploratory Conceptual Design for Sustainable Toy Scenarios
    Lijuan Mao, Yuxin Gong, Chenyang Liu +1
    PolymersPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textMaterials & polymersEurope PMCCrossref
BibTeX
@article{wieruszewski2026moisture,
  title = {{Moisture Preparation and Bending Performance of Metal Plate Connected C24 Spruce Members in an Exploratory Comparison of Two Connector Systems}},
  author = {Marek Wieruszewski and Weronika Magdziak and Arkadiusz Gronowski and Agnieszka Katarzyna Wdowiak-Postulak},
  journal = {Polymers},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.3390/polym18192393},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/PMC13666639},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Moisture Preparation and Bending Performance of Metal Plate Connected C24 Spruce Members in an Exploratory Comparison of Two Connector Systems
AU  - Marek Wieruszewski
AU  - Weronika Magdziak
AU  - Arkadiusz Gronowski
AU  - Agnieszka Katarzyna Wdowiak-Postulak
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/30
JO  - Polymers
DO  - 10.3390/polym18192393
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/PMC13666639
AB  - Moisture preparation, moisture at testing, and timber variability can jointly influence the response of metal-plate-connected (MPC) members. This exploratory re-analysis concerns 18 C24 Norway spruce assemblies (45 × 170 mm) with Mitek T150 or Ristek LL13 plates. The principal comparison includes 14 directly conditioned specimens in nominal 15%, 20%, and 40% preparation groups, with only two or three beams per connector–group cell; four moisture-transition specimens are described separately. Pooled mean ultimate loads were 14.15, 11.41, and 10.22 kN, respectively. An additive model summarized a nominal-group association (F(2,10) ≈ 12.29, p ≈ 0.002; bias-reduced, nonpartial ω2 ≈ 0.587), but this estimate remains uncertain in such a small sample. The connector comparison was inconclusive (p ≈ 0.122), rather than evidence of equivalent performance. In the nominal 40% group, reported mean moisture differed substantially between Mitek and Ristek (40.45% and 26.35%), and resistance-meter readings in the wet range lack documented validation. Separate verified moisture records at pressing and testing, and the timber-allocation procedure, are not documented. Consequently, preparation history, test-state moisture, connector system, and possible timber-batch differences cannot be separated causally. Laboratory coupons were summarized at the parent-beam level, without treating subsamples as independent treatment replicates. The findings identify associations requiring a balanced, replicated experiment; they do not establish an assembly-moisture effect, a connector ranking, or a design reduction factor.
SN  - 2073-4360
ER  -