Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,203 studies31 sourcesUpdated 18 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

Supervising the Chain Ladder

Abstract

The chain ladder's volume-weighted pattern minimises an explicit loss function, yet is rarely booked as such. Practitioners adjust the pattern and record the final adjusted ratios. This paper treats the chain ladder's pattern selection as a supervised-learning problem. Judgement on pattern adjustments becomes a framework of defined penalties and hyperparameters on the chain ladder's loss function, treated here as an objective function in machine learning. Data weights are generalised with a decay and a power parameter for recency and volume weighting. Benchmark shaping and smoothness enter through a reference penalty and Whittaker-Henderson smoothing. The assembled objective is strictly convex and minimised by a single linear system. Each hyperparameter becomes an interpretable adjustment in its own right, declarable by judgement and categorised as an experience or a prospective adjustment. Experience adjustments can be set more objectively by a proposed training loop and a reserve validation score on held-out calendar diagonals. Further hyperparameter-based adjustments are written as almost-everywhere differentiable penalties that re-time or reshape the pattern. A worked example carries one real Schedule P triangle through an incurred and then a paid training stage, demonstrating the workflow.

Related

  1. Exponential Seniority Weighting Chain-Ladder Reserving
    Mario V. Wüthrich
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsarXiv
  2. A Multiplicative Loss Function for Chain Ladder
    James Grove, Stephan Marais
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsarXiv
  3. A stable multipersistence invariant for ladder modules
    Marco Delgado-Garrido, Lars Moberg Salbu, Alvaro Torras-Casas +1
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textGeometry & topologyarXiv
  4. Eigenstates on O∗-algebras with an application to ladder operators
    Fabio Bagarello, Hiroshi Inoue, Salvatore Triolo
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textMathematical physicsarXiv
  5. Romanovski polynomials, Gegenbauer connections, and su(1,1) ladder structures
    José A. Vallejo, Mariana Kirchbach
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textAnalysis & PDEsMathematical physicsarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{marais2026supervising,
  title = {{Supervising the Chain Ladder}},
  author = {Stephan Marais and James Grove},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.16552},
  eprint = {2609.16552},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.16552},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Supervising the Chain Ladder
AU  - Stephan Marais
AU  - James Grove
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/05
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.16552
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.16552
AB  - The chain ladder's volume-weighted pattern minimises an explicit loss function, yet is rarely booked as such. Practitioners adjust the pattern and record the final adjusted ratios. This paper treats the chain ladder's pattern selection as a supervised-learning problem. Judgement on pattern adjustments becomes a framework of defined penalties and hyperparameters on the chain ladder's loss function, treated here as an objective function in machine learning. Data weights are generalised with a decay and a power parameter for recency and volume weighting. Benchmark shaping and smoothness enter through a reference penalty and Whittaker-Henderson smoothing. The assembled objective is strictly convex and minimised by a single linear system. Each hyperparameter becomes an interpretable adjustment in its own right, declarable by judgement and categorised as an experience or a prospective adjustment. Experience adjustments can be set more objectively by a proposed training loop and a reserve validation score on held-out calendar diagonals. Further hyperparameter-based adjustments are written as almost-everywhere differentiable penalties that re-time or reshape the pattern. A worked example carries one real Schedule P triangle through an incurred and then a paid training stage, demonstrating the workflow.
ER  -