Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 21 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

A Multiplicative Loss Function for Chain Ladder

Abstract

Reserving models increasingly rely on loss-based estimation, where the loss function encodes the assumed error structure. Mack demonstrated this for the chain ladder, showing that the volume-weighted average estimator minimises a volume-weighted squared-error loss function that is additive in successive claim developments. This paper instead considers a multiplicative error structure and proposes the corresponding volume-weighted squared log-error loss function. Adapting Mack's distribution-free framework, we show that this loss function is minimised by the volume-weighted geometric average of the individual development ratios. This provides practitioners with an alternative estimator of development ratios for chain-ladder-based models, and a candidate loss function for machine-learning-based reserving models. We further show that the same estimator arises from two independent arguments: a stability requirement on successive ultimate loss projections, and maximum-likelihood estimation under a log-normal model. The estimator thus admits three complementary justifications: loss minimisation, reserve stability, and parametric likelihood. An out-of-sample study of 362 Schedule P company-line datasets supports the use of the proposed estimator in place of the volume-weighted average for the chain ladder, by showing that it improves predictive accuracy and reduces a slight over-prediction bias.

Related

  1. Exponential Seniority Weighting Chain-Ladder Reserving
    Mario V. Wüthrich
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsarXiv
  2. Supervising the Chain Ladder
    Stephan Marais, James Grove
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsarXiv
  3. Low moments of automorphic random multiplicative function sums
    Sun-Kai Leung
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textAlgebra & number theoryProbabilityarXiv
  4. Counting zero-sum subspaces for the multiplicative inverse function
    Kaimin Cheng
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textAlgebra & number theoryCombinatorics & discrete mathematicsarXiv
  5. Long runs and rare patterns of a random completely multiplicative function
    Brice Pouly
    PreprintCC BYFull text5 citedAlgebra & number theoryOpenAlex
BibTeX
@misc{grove2026multiplicative,
  title = {{A Multiplicative Loss Function for Chain Ladder}},
  author = {James Grove and Stephan Marais},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.16561},
  eprint = {2609.16561},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.16561},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - A Multiplicative Loss Function for Chain Ladder
AU  - James Grove
AU  - Stephan Marais
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/15
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.16561
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.16561
AB  - Reserving models increasingly rely on loss-based estimation, where the loss function encodes the assumed error structure. Mack demonstrated this for the chain ladder, showing that the volume-weighted average estimator minimises a volume-weighted squared-error loss function that is additive in successive claim developments. This paper instead considers a multiplicative error structure and proposes the corresponding volume-weighted squared log-error loss function. Adapting Mack's distribution-free framework, we show that this loss function is minimised by the volume-weighted geometric average of the individual development ratios. This provides practitioners with an alternative estimator of development ratios for chain-ladder-based models, and a candidate loss function for machine-learning-based reserving models. We further show that the same estimator arises from two independent arguments: a stability requirement on successive ultimate loss projections, and maximum-likelihood estimation under a log-normal model. The estimator thus admits three complementary justifications: loss minimisation, reserve stability, and parametric likelihood. An out-of-sample study of 362 Schedule P company-line datasets supports the use of the proposed estimator in place of the volume-weighted average for the chain ladder, by showing that it improves predictive accuracy and reduces a slight over-prediction bias.
ER  -