Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,578 studies31 sourcesUpdated 6 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Frontiers in Microbiology

Enhanced detection of polymicrobial bloodstream infections with 16S rDNA PCR library amplicons and clinical relevance

6 affiliations
  1. 1Medical Laboratory Center, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan
  2. 2Ningxia Key Laboratory of Clinical Pathogenic Microorganisms, Yinchuan
  3. 3Medical Laboratory Center, Xiamen Humanity Women and Children’s Hospital, Xiamen
  4. 4Biomedical Science, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University
  5. 5Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan
  6. 6Central Laboratory, Peking University First Hospital Ningxia Women and Children’s Hospital (Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region Maternal and Child Health Hospital), Yinchuan

Abstract

Introduction: Polymicrobial bloodstream infections (BSIs) are clinically challenging because conventional blood culture may fail to recover all causative microorganisms, particularly in patients with low microbial burden, prior antimicrobial exposure, or infections caused by fastidious organisms. This study evaluated a 16S rDNA PCR library construction strategy based on cloning and Sanger sequencing as a complementary approach to conventional blood culture and compared its microbial detection profile with that of direct 16S rDNA amplicon high-throughput sequencing.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 16,970 blood culture specimens collected at a hospital in northwestern China to characterize the clinical distribution and epidemiological features of BSIs. In a retrospective cohort of 295 patients with culture-confirmed BSI, clinical predictors associated with blood culture-defined polymicrobial BSI were evaluated using multivariable logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses, with particular emphasis on white blood cell (WBC) count and procalcitonin (PCT) levels. In a separate molecular comparison cohort of 20 patients, cell-free DNA (cfDNA) was analyzed using two 16S rDNA-based workflows: a clone-based approach involving PCR amplification, gel purification, cloning, amplified ribosomal DNA restriction analysis (ARDRA), and Sanger sequencing, and a direct 16S rDNA amplicon high-throughput sequencing approach.

Results: Among the 16,970 blood culture specimens, 1,321 were positive, including 45 polymicrobial BSI cases. Escherichia coli was the most frequently identified pathogen, followed by coagulase-negative staphylococci and Brucella spp. Compared with monomicrobial BSI, polymicrobial BSI was associated with higher WBC counts and PCT levels. In multivariable analysis, both WBC count and PCT were independently associated with polymicrobial BSI, and their combination showed good discriminatory performance (AUC = 0.927). In the separate molecular comparison cohort of 20 patients, the three methods showed distinct detection ranges. Blood culture detected 0–1 microbial taxon per patient, with one pathogen identified in 17 patients and negative results in 3 patients. The clone-based method detected a broader microbial spectrum, identifying 0–5 taxa per patient, whereas direct 16S rDNA amplicon sequencing showed the broadest detection range, with more than five taxa detected in 9 patients. In contrast, 16S rDNA high-throughput sequencing generated broader taxonomic profiles but showed lower agreement with blood culture. Compared with conventional blood culture, the 16S rDNA PCR library method showed an overall percent agreement of 80.0%.

Conclusion: WBC and PCT may help identify patients at increased risk of polymicrobial BSI and may support the selection of patients for additional molecular testing. The cloning-based 16S rDNA PCR library strategy provides a complementary approach to conventional blood culture and may offer a balance between broader microbial detection and more focused sequence-level interpretation compared with direct amplicon high-throughput sequencing. Its potential utility may be particularly relevant in selected patients with culture-negative or clinically suspected polymicrobial BSI.

Related

  1. Application and evaluation of nanopore targeted sequencing in the detection of bacterial and fungal pathogens in leukemia bloodstream infections.
    Qian Yao, Ling Tang, Daozi Jiang +1
    Frontiers in microbiologyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textMicrobiologyEurope PMC
  2. Enterococcus faecalis-derived lactic acid suppresses macrophage activation to facilitate persistent and polymicrobial wound infections
    Ronni A.G. da Silva, Brenda Yin Qi Tien, Patrick Hsien Neng Kao +9
    Cell Host and MicrobePeer-reviewedCC BY12 citedCell biologyHAL
  3. Real-life evaluation of BioFire® BCID2 and Vitek® REVEALTM for Gram-negative bloodstream infections in critical care
    Massinissa Benyahia, Claire Roger, Adeline Boutet-Dubois +7
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textMicrobiologyPhysiologyPLOS
  4. Bacterial profile and antibiotic susceptibility of bloodstream infections among infants, children, and adolescents undergoing treatment for acute leukemia
    Razan Zatarah, Tala Albdour, Alaa Assad +2
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textMicrobiologyInfectious diseasePLOS
  5. Seven versus fourteen days for resistant bloodstream infections: what do we actually know? A scoping review
    Valentina Zuccaro, Erika Asperges, Lea Nadia Marvulli +4
    InfectionPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textMicrobiologyPMC
BibTeX
@article{li2026enhanced,
  title = {{Enhanced detection of polymicrobial bloodstream infections with 16S rDNA PCR library amplicons and clinical relevance}},
  author = {Guangqi Li and Geng Wu and He Yin and Kendall A. McGraw and Jia Hou and Zhijun Zhao},
  journal = {Frontiers in Microbiology},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3389/fmicb.2026.1916658},
  url = {https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2026.1916658/full},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Enhanced detection of polymicrobial bloodstream infections with 16S rDNA PCR library amplicons and clinical relevance
AU  - Guangqi Li
AU  - Geng Wu
AU  - He Yin
AU  - Kendall A. McGraw
AU  - Jia Hou
AU  - Zhijun Zhao
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/15
JO  - Frontiers in Microbiology
DO  - 10.3389/fmicb.2026.1916658
UR  - https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2026.1916658/full
AB  - Introduction: Polymicrobial bloodstream infections (BSIs) are clinically challenging because conventional blood culture may fail to recover all causative microorganisms, particularly in patients with low microbial burden, prior antimicrobial exposure, or infections caused by fastidious organisms. This study evaluated a 16S rDNA PCR library construction strategy based on cloning and Sanger sequencing as a complementary approach to conventional blood culture and compared its microbial detection profile with that of direct 16S rDNA amplicon high-throughput sequencing.  Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 16,970 blood culture specimens collected at a hospital in northwestern China to characterize the clinical distribution and epidemiological features of BSIs. In a retrospective cohort of 295 patients with culture-confirmed BSI, clinical predictors associated with blood culture-defined polymicrobial BSI were evaluated using multivariable logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses, with particular emphasis on white blood cell (WBC) count and procalcitonin (PCT) levels. In a separate molecular comparison cohort of 20 patients, cell-free DNA (cfDNA) was analyzed using two 16S rDNA-based workflows: a clone-based approach involving PCR amplification, gel purification, cloning, amplified ribosomal DNA restriction analysis (ARDRA), and Sanger sequencing, and a direct 16S rDNA amplicon high-throughput sequencing approach.  Results: Among the 16,970 blood culture specimens, 1,321 were positive, including 45 polymicrobial BSI cases. Escherichia coli was the most frequently identified pathogen, followed by coagulase-negative staphylococci and Brucella spp. Compared with monomicrobial BSI, polymicrobial BSI was associated with higher WBC counts and PCT levels. In multivariable analysis, both WBC count and PCT were independently associated with polymicrobial BSI, and their combination showed good discriminatory performance (AUC = 0.927). In the separate molecular comparison cohort of 20 patients, the three methods showed distinct detection ranges. Blood culture detected 0–1 microbial taxon per patient, with one pathogen identified in 17 patients and negative results in 3 patients. The clone-based method detected a broader microbial spectrum, identifying 0–5 taxa per patient, whereas direct 16S rDNA amplicon sequencing showed the broadest detection range, with more than five taxa detected in 9 patients. In contrast, 16S rDNA high-throughput sequencing generated broader taxonomic profiles but showed lower agreement with blood culture. Compared with conventional blood culture, the 16S rDNA PCR library method showed an overall percent agreement of 80.0%.  Conclusion: WBC and PCT may help identify patients at increased risk of polymicrobial BSI and may support the selection of patients for additional molecular testing. The cloning-based 16S rDNA PCR library strategy provides a complementary approach to conventional blood culture and may offer a balance between broader microbial detection and more focused sequence-level interpretation compared with direct amplicon high-throughput sequencing. Its potential utility may be particularly relevant in selected patients with culture-negative or clinically suspected polymicrobial BSI.
SN  - 1664-302X
ER  -