Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 39 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Scientific Reports

Metabolic and hormonal responses to nutritional ketosis across metabolic phenotypes and sex in adults

Abstract

Ketogenic diets are increasingly used for weight management and metabolic improvement, but it remains unclear whether nutritional ketosis induces uniform adaptation across metabolic phenotypes and sex. This exploratory study examined phenotype- and sex-dependent responses to a 60-day ketogenic diet in adults with normal weight, overweight or obesity. Participants were stratified into six metabolic phenotype–sex groups and assessed at baseline, day 14, day 30 and day 60. Plasma biochemical and hormonal markers, appetite and perceived stress scores, and body composition were analyzed using repeated-measures models. During the ketogenic diet intervention, β-hydroxybutyrate increased in all groups, confirming nutritional ketosis, but the response differed between groups and was most progressive in men with obesity. Free fatty acids manifested in a heterogeneous manner, exhibiting distinct time-, phenotype-, and sex-dependent profiles. Glucose decreased after diet initiation, whereas insulin and HOMA-IR improved mainly in participants with overweight and obesity. Lipid profile changes were variable, while liver enzymes showed a sex-dependent temporal pattern. Appetite score differed by metabolic phenotype, leptin changed according to phenotype and sex, and ghrelin remained unchanged. Self-reported perceived stress scores showed group-specific changes, whereas cortisol changed over time and body mass, fat mass, visceral adipose tissue and subcutaneous adipose tissue decreased. These findings indicate that responses observed during the ketogenic diet intervention showed variable patterns across metabolic phenotypes and sex; however, given the limited sample size, these apparent between-group differences should be interpreted cautiously. Because of the single-arm design, these changes cannot be attributed to nutritional ketosis independently of weight loss or changes in energy intake.

Related

  1. Associations Between Serum Osteocalcin and Metabolic, Nutritional, and Hormonal Status in Male Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease: A Cross-Sectional Study
    BiomedicinesPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  2. Metabolic Phenotyping Identifies Distinct Urinary Anti-Adhesion Phenotypes and Differential Responses to Cranberry Juice Intake in Healthy Women
    Shuhan Li, Manasi Kamat, Diana H. Taft +2
    NutrientsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEpidemiology & public healthEurope PMCCrossref
  3. The role of sitagliptin in modifying metabolic, hormonal and clinical parameters in polycystic ovarian syndrome patients: a randomized controlled trial
    Ahmed E. Altyar, Dina Y. Dessouky, Sara Abdallah Mohamed Salem +2
    Frontiers in pharmacologyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textPharmacology & toxicologyEurope PMC
  4. Metabolic drivers of MASLD and MASH: from hormonal imbalance to fibrosis
    Amalia Gastaldelli, Egeria Scoditti, Maria Paula Macedo
    DiabetologiaPeer-reviewedCC BYFull text11 citedEpidemiology & public healthOpenAlex
  5. Late-onset and functional hypogonadism in aging men: an integrated perspective on hormonal, sleep, and metabolic dimensions
    Monica Levy Andersen, J. M. Sanches, T. A. Alvarenga +3
    Journal of Endocrinological InvestigationPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textEndocrinology & metabolismPMC
BibTeX
@article{grabowski2026metabolic,
  title = {{Metabolic and hormonal responses to nutritional ketosis across metabolic phenotypes and sex in adults}},
  author = {Mateusz Grabowski and Konstancja Grabowska and Grzegorz Klonek and Małgorzata Michalczyk and Grzegorz Zydek and Mariusz Panek and Andrzej Małecki and Marta Nowacka-Chmielewska},
  journal = {Scientific Reports},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1038/s41598-026-77834-6},
  url = {https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-026-77834-6},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Metabolic and hormonal responses to nutritional ketosis across metabolic phenotypes and sex in adults
AU  - Mateusz Grabowski
AU  - Konstancja Grabowska
AU  - Grzegorz Klonek
AU  - Małgorzata Michalczyk
AU  - Grzegorz Zydek
AU  - Mariusz Panek
AU  - Andrzej Małecki
AU  - Marta Nowacka-Chmielewska
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/28
JO  - Scientific Reports
DO  - 10.1038/s41598-026-77834-6
UR  - https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-026-77834-6
AB  - Ketogenic diets are increasingly used for weight management and metabolic improvement, but it remains unclear whether nutritional ketosis induces uniform adaptation across metabolic phenotypes and sex. This exploratory study examined phenotype- and sex-dependent responses to a 60-day ketogenic diet in adults with normal weight, overweight or obesity. Participants were stratified into six metabolic phenotype–sex groups and assessed at baseline, day 14, day 30 and day 60. Plasma biochemical and hormonal markers, appetite and perceived stress scores, and body composition were analyzed using repeated-measures models. During the ketogenic diet intervention, β-hydroxybutyrate increased in all groups, confirming nutritional ketosis, but the response differed between groups and was most progressive in men with obesity. Free fatty acids manifested in a heterogeneous manner, exhibiting distinct time-, phenotype-, and sex-dependent profiles. Glucose decreased after diet initiation, whereas insulin and HOMA-IR improved mainly in participants with overweight and obesity. Lipid profile changes were variable, while liver enzymes showed a sex-dependent temporal pattern. Appetite score differed by metabolic phenotype, leptin changed according to phenotype and sex, and ghrelin remained unchanged. Self-reported perceived stress scores showed group-specific changes, whereas cortisol changed over time and body mass, fat mass, visceral adipose tissue and subcutaneous adipose tissue decreased. These findings indicate that responses observed during the ketogenic diet intervention showed variable patterns across metabolic phenotypes and sex; however, given the limited sample size, these apparent between-group differences should be interpreted cautiously. Because of the single-arm design, these changes cannot be attributed to nutritional ketosis independently of weight loss or changes in energy intake.
SN  - 2045-2322
ER  -