Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,948 studies31 sourcesUpdated 44 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Polymers

The Development and Evolution of Substrate Materials for Brain–Computer Interfaces

5 affiliations
  1. 1The Key Laboratory of Bioorganic Phosphorus Chemistry & Chemical Biology, Department of Chemistry, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
  2. 2State Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, School of Life Sciences, Human Phenome Institute, Zhangjiang Fudan International Innovation Center, Fudan University, Shanghai 201203, China
  3. 3School of Future Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing 100102, China
  4. 4School of Materials Science and Engineering, North Minzu University, Yinchuan 750021, China
  5. 5Department of Chemistry and Center for Nanotechnology, Chung Yuan Christian University, Chung Li District, Taoyuan 32023, Taiwan

Abstract

Brain–Computer Interfaces (BCIs) hold tremendous potential for neurological therapeutics and neuroprosthetics; however, their long-term clinical viability is fundamentally limited by chronic interfacial failure. This failure originates from the profound biomechanical mismatch between synthetic microelectrodes and ultra-soft brain tissue, which inevitably triggers persistent mechanical trauma, severe foreign body response (FBR), and insulating glial scarring. In this review, we systematically trace the material and structural evolution of implantable neural interfaces designed to bridge this critical gap. We detail the chronological paradigm shift from rigid inorganic substrates (e.g., silicon) to flexible yet inextensible polymers (e.g., Polyimide, SU-8) for conformal mapping, and subsequently to intrinsically stretchable elastomers (e.g., polydimethylsiloxane polyurethane) that effectively absorb dynamic physiological micro-shear forces. Most importantly, we highlight the emerging frontier of electrospun nanofibrous microelectrodes. By uniquely combining macroscopic tissue-level stretchability with an interconnected, highly permeable 3D topography that mimics the native extracellular matrix (ECM), these biomimetic scaffolds successfully overcome the metabolic limitations of dense elastomeric films. Finally, we discuss current challenges and future perspectives, ranging from scalable high-density manufacturing and active biochemical modulation to fully untethered integration, charting a comprehensive roadmap for next-generation, chronically stable neural interfaces.

Related

  1. Regulating Next-Generation Implantable Brain-Computer Interfaces: Recommendations for Ethical Development and Implementation
    Renée A. Sirbu, Jessica Morley, T. Schröder +5
    NeuroethicsPeer-reviewedLicence not stated10 citedNeuroscienceOpenAlex
  2. Engineering Neural Interface Materials for Brain–Computer Interfaces: Toward Reliable Neural Information and Functional Recovery
    Kaixin Xu, Qinglei Li, Yangmei Dong +6
    Biomaterials researchPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textNeuroscienceEurope PMCPMC
  3. Human learning of noninvasive brain–computer interfaces via manifold geometry
    Erica L. Busch, E. Chandra Fincke, Guillaume Lajoie +2
    Nature NeurosciencePeer-reviewedLicence not stated7 citedNeuroscienceOpenAlex
  4. Real-time noise cancellation for EEG monitoring and brain-computer interfaces
    M. Makkonen, O.-P. Kahilakoski, J. Metsomaa +3
    bioRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textNeurosciencebioRxiv
  5. Large language models integrated into brain–computer interfaces for communication and control: a systematic review
    Alon Gorenshtein, Mahmud Omar, Yiftach Barash +2
    Biomedical Physics & Engineering ExpressPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull text5 citedNeuroscienceOpenAlex
BibTeX
@article{ji2026development,
  title = {{The Development and Evolution of Substrate Materials for Brain–Computer Interfaces}},
  author = {Jiujiang Ji and Yidan Gao and Juan Liu and Mei Tian and Yen Wei},
  journal = {Polymers},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3390/polym18202569},
  url = {https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4360/18/20/2569},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - The Development and Evolution of Substrate Materials for Brain–Computer Interfaces
AU  - Jiujiang Ji
AU  - Yidan Gao
AU  - Juan Liu
AU  - Mei Tian
AU  - Yen Wei
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/01
JO  - Polymers
DO  - 10.3390/polym18202569
UR  - https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4360/18/20/2569
AB  - Brain–Computer Interfaces (BCIs) hold tremendous potential for neurological therapeutics and neuroprosthetics; however, their long-term clinical viability is fundamentally limited by chronic interfacial failure. This failure originates from the profound biomechanical mismatch between synthetic microelectrodes and ultra-soft brain tissue, which inevitably triggers persistent mechanical trauma, severe foreign body response (FBR), and insulating glial scarring. In this review, we systematically trace the material and structural evolution of implantable neural interfaces designed to bridge this critical gap. We detail the chronological paradigm shift from rigid inorganic substrates (e.g., silicon) to flexible yet inextensible polymers (e.g., Polyimide, SU-8) for conformal mapping, and subsequently to intrinsically stretchable elastomers (e.g., polydimethylsiloxane polyurethane) that effectively absorb dynamic physiological micro-shear forces. Most importantly, we highlight the emerging frontier of electrospun nanofibrous microelectrodes. By uniquely combining macroscopic tissue-level stretchability with an interconnected, highly permeable 3D topography that mimics the native extracellular matrix (ECM), these biomimetic scaffolds successfully overcome the metabolic limitations of dense elastomeric films. Finally, we discuss current challenges and future perspectives, ranging from scalable high-density manufacturing and active biochemical modulation to fully untethered integration, charting a comprehensive roadmap for next-generation, chronically stable neural interfaces.
SN  - 2073-4360
ER  -