Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 2 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Thrombosis Journal

Decision dilemmas and insights in secondary prevention of ischemic stroke: a case report of an elderly patient with hereditary thrombophilia and high-risk patent foramen ovale

4 affiliations
  1. 1Institute of Basic Experiments, Zhejiang Academy of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Hangzhou, China
  2. 2Department of Cardiology, Tongde Hospital of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, China
  3. 3Department of Neurology, Tongde Hospital of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, China
  4. 4Department of Critical Care Units, Tongde Hospital of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, China

Abstract

This study reports the case of a 74-year-old female patient (aged 70 at the initial 2021 event) with hereditary thrombophilia and a patent foramen ovale (PFO) possessing high-risk anatomical features. The patient presented in December 2021 with pulmonary embolism and acute multiple cerebral infarctions due to PFO-associated paradoxical embolism. Genetic testing confirmed hereditary thrombophilia (plasminogen activator inhibitor-1, 4G/4G genotype). Despite standard anticoagulation, she developed recurrent thrombosis. Subsequent transesophageal echocardiography (May 2025) delineated the high-risk PFO anatomy. The Risk of Paradoxical Embolism (RoPE) score was 3, corresponding to a PFO‑attributable fraction of approximately 23%. This case illustrates a dual-risk mechanism for stroke: a persistent prothrombotic state coexisting with a definitive structural embolic pathway. The patient subsequently underwent percutaneous PFO closure. This case highlights the conflict between the need for individualized intervention based on dual high-risk mechanisms and the age-based recommendations of current guidelines (ESC 2023, AHA/ASA 2021). Anatomical assessment of the PFO enables a more precise estimation of stroke recurrence risk and the potential value of closure. As a causative therapy aimed at eliminating the structural embolic pathway, PFO closure may represent a reasonable interventional strategy in such carefully selected high-risk patients; however, its definitive net clinical benefit requires validation through prospective, large-scale trials.

Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1186/s12959-026-00905-1.

Related

  1. CO090 | DIRECT ORAL ANTICOAGULANTS IN THE SECONDARY PREVENTION OF VENOUS THROMBOEMBOLISM IN PATIENTS WITH SEVERE INHERITED THROMBOPHILIA: A REAL-WORLD MULTICENTER STUDY
    Antonella Tufano
    Bleeding, Thrombosis and Vascular BiologyPeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textCardiovascular medicineDOAJ
  2. Integration of hereditary thrombophilia data and polygenic risk scores into prognostic models improves differential diagnosis of CTEPH.
    Yaroslav Kubkin, Dmitry Nikulin, Galina Okhrimenko +10
    Frontiers in cardiovascular medicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textCardiovascular medicineEurope PMCCrossref
  3. PO008 | HISTORY OF CANCER IN VTE PATIENTS WITH AND WITHOUT HEREDITARY THROMBOPHILIA: A SINGLE CENTER COHORT STUDY
    Angela Napolitano
    Bleeding, Thrombosis and Vascular BiologyPeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textCardiovascular medicineDOAJ
  4. Low-threshold secondary and tertiary suicide prevention measures for individuals with suicid-related thoughts and behaviors: a scoping review
    Cora Spahn, Lena Spangenberg, Clara Sturbeck +2
    Frontiers in public healthPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEpidemiology & public healthEurope PMC
  5. Evaluating the quality and safety of a nurse practitioner-led virtual clinic for secondary prevention in stable coronary artery disease: a pilot feasibility study.
    Anwar Abdi, Holly Rector, Vivian Hung +1
    BMJ open qualityPeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textEpidemiology & public healthEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{xue2026decision,
  title = {{Decision dilemmas and insights in secondary prevention of ischemic stroke: a case report of an elderly patient with hereditary thrombophilia and high-risk patent foramen ovale}},
  author = {Xiaomin Xue and Tianjie Zhang and Ziqiang Yu and Muhua Dai},
  journal = {Thrombosis Journal},
  year = {2026},
  month = jul,
  doi = {10.1186/s12959-026-00905-1},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s12959-026-00905-1},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Decision dilemmas and insights in secondary prevention of ischemic stroke: a case report of an elderly patient with hereditary thrombophilia and high-risk patent foramen ovale
AU  - Xiaomin Xue
AU  - Tianjie Zhang
AU  - Ziqiang Yu
AU  - Muhua Dai
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/07/29
JO  - Thrombosis Journal
DO  - 10.1186/s12959-026-00905-1
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1186/s12959-026-00905-1
AB  - This study reports the case of a 74-year-old female patient (aged 70 at the initial 2021 event) with hereditary thrombophilia and a patent foramen ovale (PFO) possessing high-risk anatomical features. The patient presented in December 2021 with pulmonary embolism and acute multiple cerebral infarctions due to PFO-associated paradoxical embolism. Genetic testing confirmed hereditary thrombophilia (plasminogen activator inhibitor-1, 4G/4G genotype). Despite standard anticoagulation, she developed recurrent thrombosis. Subsequent transesophageal echocardiography (May 2025) delineated the high-risk PFO anatomy. The Risk of Paradoxical Embolism (RoPE) score was 3, corresponding to a PFO‑attributable fraction of approximately 23%. This case illustrates a dual-risk mechanism for stroke: a persistent prothrombotic state coexisting with a definitive structural embolic pathway. The patient subsequently underwent percutaneous PFO closure. This case highlights the conflict between the need for individualized intervention based on dual high-risk mechanisms and the age-based recommendations of current guidelines (ESC 2023, AHA/ASA 2021). Anatomical assessment of the PFO enables a more precise estimation of stroke recurrence risk and the potential value of closure. As a causative therapy aimed at eliminating the structural embolic pathway, PFO closure may represent a reasonable interventional strategy in such carefully selected high-risk patients; however, its definitive net clinical benefit requires validation through prospective, large-scale trials.  Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1186/s12959-026-00905-1.
SN  - 1477-9560
ER  -