Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,357 studies31 sourcesUpdated 10 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NCBleeding, Thrombosis and Vascular Biology

PO008 | HISTORY OF CANCER IN VTE PATIENTS WITH AND WITHOUT HEREDITARY THROMBOPHILIA: A SINGLE CENTER COHORT STUDY

Abstract

Background and Aims. Hypercoagulability is a well-recognized feature of cancer and may play a role in tumor development and progression. Hereditary thrombophilia confers a lifelong predisposition to thrombosis, yet its relationship with cancer risk remains uncertain. This study aims to compare the prevalence of cancer among patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE) with and without hereditary thrombophilia. Methods. Consecutive patients with a history of venous thromboembolism (VTE) who underwent hereditary thrombophilia testing were enrolled. Patients were classified into three groups: no thrombophilia, mild thrombophilia, and severe thrombophilia (n = 200 each). The primary outcome was a history of cancer, defined as any solid or hematological malignancy diagnosed at any time. Age at first VTE was used as age at inclusion. Prevalence ratios (PRs) for cancer were estimated using Poisson regression with a log link and robust standard errors, adjusted for age and sex. Incident post-VTE cancer was analyzed after excluding pre-VTE cancer cases, using Cox regression adjusted for age and sex. Results. Cancer prevalence was 12.5% (25/200) in patients without thrombophilia, 14.0% (28/200) in those with mild thrombophilia, and 11.0% (22/200) in those with severe thrombophilia. Adjusted Poisson regression showed no association between thrombophilia status and overall cancer prevalence (mild vs no thrombophilia: PR 1.31, 95% CI 0.74–2.32, p = 0.362; severe vs no thrombophilia: PR 1.06, 95% CI 0.59–1.91, p = 0.839), while increasing age was independently associated with cancer (p = 0.001). Pre-VTE cancer prevalence was 9.0% (18/200) in patients without thrombophilia, 2.5% (5/200) in mild thrombophilia, and 6.5% (13/200) in severe thrombophilia. However, thrombophilia was not independently associated with pre-VTE cancer after adjustment for age and sex (overall p = 0.212). In sensitivity analyses based on thrombophilia subtypes, an overall association between subtype and pre-VTE cancer was observed (p = 0.041), mainly driven by protein C deficiency (PR 2.19 vs no thrombophilia; p = 0.032). Median age at cancer diagnosis was 64.5 [54.0–73.0] years in patients without thrombophilia, 61.5 [53.5–69.0] in mild thrombophilia, and 58.0 [47.0–66.8] in severe thrombophilia. Incident cancer occurred in 6.9% (39/564) over 5,722 person-years (0.68 per 100 person-years, 95% CI 0.47–0.90), with no association with thrombophilia in adjusted Cox regression, while age remained an independent risk factor. Conclusions. In VTE patients, hereditary thrombophilia was not independently associated with overall cancer prevalence. Cancer risk was mainly driven by age. Subtype analyses suggested a possible signal for protein C deficiency and pre-VTE cancer, but this finding requires confirmation.

Related

  1. Correlation between the Prevalence of Colorectal Polyps in Patients with and without a Family History of Colorectal Cancer
    Maura Tarciany Coutinho Cajazeiras de Oliveira, Raissa Scarlet Queiroz Fernandes, Rosilma Gorete Lima Barreto +5
    Journal of ColoproctologyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textOncologyDOAJ
  2. Finerenone benefits in patients with cardio-kidney-metabolic syndrome with or without history of cancer: the FINE-HEART pooled analysis
    Mihály Ruppert, Muthiah Vaduganathan, Brian L Claggett +20
    European Heart JournalPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0Full text1 citedEndocrinology & metabolismHAL
  3. Decision dilemmas and insights in secondary prevention of ischemic stroke: a case report of an elderly patient with hereditary thrombophilia and high-risk patent foramen ovale
    Xiaomin Xue, Tianjie Zhang, Ziqiang Yu +1
    Thrombosis JournalPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textGeneral medicinePMC
  4. Integration of hereditary thrombophilia data and polygenic risk scores into prognostic models improves differential diagnosis of CTEPH.
    Yaroslav Kubkin, Dmitry Nikulin, Galina Okhrimenko +10
    Frontiers in cardiovascular medicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textCardiovascular medicineEurope PMCCrossref
  5. Comparison Between Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Patients with and Without Family History of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus—A Single-Center Retrospective Study
    Joanna Kosałka-Węgiel
    Journal of clinical medicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{napolitano2026po008,
  title = {{PO008 | HISTORY OF CANCER IN VTE PATIENTS WITH AND WITHOUT HEREDITARY THROMBOPHILIA: A SINGLE CENTER COHORT STUDY}},
  author = {Angela Napolitano},
  journal = {Bleeding, Thrombosis and Vascular Biology},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  url = {https://www.btvb.org/btvb/article/view/824},
  note = {CC BY-NC},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - PO008 | HISTORY OF CANCER IN VTE PATIENTS WITH AND WITHOUT HEREDITARY THROMBOPHILIA: A SINGLE CENTER COHORT STUDY
AU  - Angela Napolitano
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/26
JO  - Bleeding, Thrombosis and Vascular Biology
UR  - https://www.btvb.org/btvb/article/view/824
AB  - Background and Aims. Hypercoagulability is a well-recognized feature of cancer and may play a role in tumor development and progression. Hereditary thrombophilia confers a lifelong predisposition to thrombosis, yet its relationship with cancer risk remains uncertain. This study aims to compare the prevalence of cancer among patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE) with and without hereditary thrombophilia. Methods. Consecutive patients with a history of venous thromboembolism (VTE) who underwent hereditary thrombophilia testing were enrolled. Patients were classified into three groups: no thrombophilia, mild thrombophilia, and severe thrombophilia (n = 200 each). The primary outcome was a history of cancer, defined as any solid or hematological malignancy diagnosed at any time. Age at first VTE was used as age at inclusion. Prevalence ratios (PRs) for cancer were estimated using Poisson regression with a log link and robust standard errors, adjusted for age and sex. Incident post-VTE cancer was analyzed after excluding pre-VTE cancer cases, using Cox regression adjusted for age and sex. Results. Cancer prevalence was 12.5% (25/200) in patients without thrombophilia, 14.0% (28/200) in those with mild thrombophilia, and 11.0% (22/200) in those with severe thrombophilia. Adjusted Poisson regression showed no association between thrombophilia status and overall cancer prevalence (mild vs no thrombophilia: PR 1.31, 95% CI 0.74–2.32, p = 0.362; severe vs no thrombophilia: PR 1.06, 95% CI 0.59–1.91, p = 0.839), while increasing age was independently associated with cancer (p = 0.001). Pre-VTE cancer prevalence was 9.0% (18/200) in patients without thrombophilia, 2.5% (5/200) in mild thrombophilia, and 6.5% (13/200) in severe thrombophilia. However, thrombophilia was not independently associated with pre-VTE cancer after adjustment for age and sex (overall p = 0.212). In sensitivity analyses based on thrombophilia subtypes, an overall association between subtype and pre-VTE cancer was observed (p = 0.041), mainly driven by protein C deficiency (PR 2.19 vs no thrombophilia; p = 0.032). Median age at cancer diagnosis was 64.5 [54.0–73.0] years in patients without thrombophilia, 61.5 [53.5–69.0] in mild thrombophilia, and 58.0 [47.0–66.8] in severe thrombophilia. Incident cancer occurred in 6.9% (39/564) over 5,722 person-years (0.68 per 100 person-years, 95% CI 0.47–0.90), with no association with thrombophilia in adjusted Cox regression, while age remained an independent risk factor. Conclusions. In VTE patients, hereditary thrombophilia was not independently associated with overall cancer prevalence. Cancer risk was mainly driven by age. Subtype analyses suggested a possible signal for protein C deficiency and pre-VTE cancer, but this finding requires confirmation.
SN  - 2785-5309
ER  -