A novel method of determining bone mineral density of the knee from a pre-surgical CT scan to aid in surgical planning
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Patients with reduced bone mineral density (BMD) may have poorer outcomes after cementless joint replacement surgery. BMD phantoms may be used to calibrate Hounsfield units (HU) to BMD values, but BMD assessment with phantoms is not routine prior to surgery. We describe automated BMD calibration using air, fat and an aluminum motion-detection rod in Mako robotic-assisted knee arthroplasty 3D CT image volumes. METHODS: Using 6111 CT knee arthroplasty planning image volumes, including 133 with a BMD phantom (Mindways, TX), mean BMD values were determined for air, fat, and bone equivalent rods as calibration standards. Image voxels containing air were identified using histogram analysis. The rod surface was identified using an Active Appearance Model (AAM) search. At each point on the AAM-segmented femoral bone surface, lines perpendicular to the surface ("normal rays) were sampled and gaussian mixture model histogram analysis was used to identify fat. Ten iterations of 10-fold cross-validation were performed to compare calibration using either the phantom or the air, fat, and rod standards in tibial and femoral trabecular bone. RESULTS: Trabecular bone BMD from phantom calibrations were highly correlated with BMD values calculated using the air, fat, and rod standards for femur and tibia (r ≈ 0.98). Bland-Altman analysis showed negligible bias of ∼0.3 mg/cm3. The standard deviation of differences was 9.9. mg/cm3, suggesting an upper bound of precision of 9 mg/cm3 (precision error for Mindways phantom is 3.6 mg/cm3), which produces a coefficient of variation of 7.7% at mean BMD=117 mg/cm3. CONCLUSION: Accurate volumetric BMD values may be derived at the knee from CT image volumes routinely acquired before robotic-assisted arthroplasty. This information may be useful in informing surgical decisions regarding the use of cementless implants, particularly in patients at risk of osteoporosis.
Related
- The relationship between genetic bone mineral density and spinal stenosis: a Mendelian randomization and cohort study
- A method for determining the content of coumarins in sweet clover seeds
- Targeted proteomics informed by long-read RNA-sequencing reveals protein isoform expression associated with bone mineral density
- Determining Reliable Neural Targets for enhancing Motor Sequence Learning: A preparatory study for focal tDCS
- Treatment of epistaxis in Osler-Weber-Rendu disease by bevacizumab nasal spray. The EROSB study: Determining the effective dose
BibTeX
@article{maguire2026novel,
title = {{A novel method of determining bone mineral density of the knee from a pre-surgical CT scan to aid in surgical planning}},
author = {Niall Maguire and Jared Weir and Sebastien Lustig and Alan Brett},
journal = {Osteoarthritis Imaging},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.1016/j.ostima.2026.100391},
url = {https://hal.science/hal-05735318v1},
note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - A novel method of determining bone mineral density of the knee from a pre-surgical CT scan to aid in surgical planning
AU - Niall Maguire
AU - Jared Weir
AU - Sebastien Lustig
AU - Alan Brett
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/02
JO - Osteoarthritis Imaging
DO - 10.1016/j.ostima.2026.100391
UR - https://hal.science/hal-05735318v1
AB - INTRODUCTION: Patients with reduced bone mineral density (BMD) may have poorer outcomes after cementless joint replacement surgery. BMD phantoms may be used to calibrate Hounsfield units (HU) to BMD values, but BMD assessment with phantoms is not routine prior to surgery. We describe automated BMD calibration using air, fat and an aluminum motion-detection rod in Mako robotic-assisted knee arthroplasty 3D CT image volumes. METHODS: Using 6111 CT knee arthroplasty planning image volumes, including 133 with a BMD phantom (Mindways, TX), mean BMD values were determined for air, fat, and bone equivalent rods as calibration standards. Image voxels containing air were identified using histogram analysis. The rod surface was identified using an Active Appearance Model (AAM) search. At each point on the AAM-segmented femoral bone surface, lines perpendicular to the surface ("normal rays) were sampled and gaussian mixture model histogram analysis was used to identify fat. Ten iterations of 10-fold cross-validation were performed to compare calibration using either the phantom or the air, fat, and rod standards in tibial and femoral trabecular bone. RESULTS: Trabecular bone BMD from phantom calibrations were highly correlated with BMD values calculated using the air, fat, and rod standards for femur and tibia (r ≈ 0.98). Bland-Altman analysis showed negligible bias of ∼0.3 mg/cm3. The standard deviation of differences was 9.9. mg/cm3, suggesting an upper bound of precision of 9 mg/cm3 (precision error for Mindways phantom is 3.6 mg/cm3), which produces a coefficient of variation of 7.7% at mean BMD=117 mg/cm3. CONCLUSION: Accurate volumetric BMD values may be derived at the knee from CT image volumes routinely acquired before robotic-assisted arthroplasty. This information may be useful in informing surgical decisions regarding the use of cementless implants, particularly in patients at risk of osteoporosis.
SN - 2772-6541
SN - 2772-6541
ER -