Pain Management Across Cultures: A Qualitative Study of Chinese and British Perspectives
Abstract
Background: Pain is a prevalent health concern, but perceptions of pain and approaches to its management may be shaped by cultural and sociocultural factors. This study explored differences in attitudes towards pain and pain management between Chinese and British participants and examined factors that may influence these perceptions. Methods: A qualitative study was conducted with 14 participants, comprising eight Chinese and six British participants. Participants completed a questionnaire concerning pain-related health perceptions and subsequently participated in semi-structured online interviews exploring their attitudes towards pain and the factors influencing their views. Interviews were conducted with participants' consent, recorded and transcribed, and analysed using thematic analysis. Ethical approval was provided by the University of Glasgow Ethics Committee. Results: No clear difference in pain-related knowledge was identified between Chinese and British participants. However, cultural and sociocultural factors appeared to influence attitudes towards pain management. Traditional cultural beliefs were associated with greater resistance to the use of analgesic medication among Chinese participants. Differences were also observed in preferred approaches to pain relief, with Chinese participants more frequently referring to physiotherapy or naturopathy, while British participants more commonly favoured pharmacological approaches. Women generally described more positive approaches to pain management than men. Family, tradition, interpersonal relationships and healthcare infrastructure were identified as important influences on pain-related perceptions and management strategies. Conclusions: The findings suggest that pain-related perceptions and management preferences are influenced by a combination of cultural and wider sociocultural factors. Understanding these influences may help inform culturally responsive approaches to pain management. Given the small sample and qualitative design, the findings provide an exploratory account rather than evidence of population-level differences between Chinese and British populations.
Related
- Cancer-related loneliness management strategies: qualitative interviews of British adults
- A qualitative study of care management challenges in patients with multiple sclerosis from patient, family caregiver and healthcare provider perspectives
- Experiences and perspectives of Ayurvedic practitioners on non-communicable disease management in the UK: A qualitative study
- Chinese women's perceptions and needs regarding the AI-assisted tools for self-management of chronic perineal pain: a qualitative study.
- Healthcare Professionals' Perspectives on Adherence Management in Home-Based Pulmonary Rehabilitation: A Qualitative Study.
BibTeX
@misc{li2026pain,
title = {{Pain Management Across Cultures: A Qualitative Study of Chinese and British Perspectives}},
author = {Xiang Li and Samuel Bennett},
howpublished = {PsyArXiv},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.31234/osf.io/v8mxf_v1},
url = {https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/v8mxf_v1/},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Pain Management Across Cultures: A Qualitative Study of Chinese and British Perspectives
AU - Xiang Li
AU - Samuel Bennett
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/21
PB - PsyArXiv
DO - 10.31234/osf.io/v8mxf_v1
UR - https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/v8mxf_v1/
AB - Background: Pain is a prevalent health concern, but perceptions of pain and approaches to its management may be shaped by cultural and sociocultural factors. This study explored differences in attitudes towards pain and pain management between Chinese and British participants and examined factors that may influence these perceptions. Methods: A qualitative study was conducted with 14 participants, comprising eight Chinese and six British participants. Participants completed a questionnaire concerning pain-related health perceptions and subsequently participated in semi-structured online interviews exploring their attitudes towards pain and the factors influencing their views. Interviews were conducted with participants' consent, recorded and transcribed, and analysed using thematic analysis. Ethical approval was provided by the University of Glasgow Ethics Committee. Results: No clear difference in pain-related knowledge was identified between Chinese and British participants. However, cultural and sociocultural factors appeared to influence attitudes towards pain management. Traditional cultural beliefs were associated with greater resistance to the use of analgesic medication among Chinese participants. Differences were also observed in preferred approaches to pain relief, with Chinese participants more frequently referring to physiotherapy or naturopathy, while British participants more commonly favoured pharmacological approaches. Women generally described more positive approaches to pain management than men. Family, tradition, interpersonal relationships and healthcare infrastructure were identified as important influences on pain-related perceptions and management strategies. Conclusions: The findings suggest that pain-related perceptions and management preferences are influenced by a combination of cultural and wider sociocultural factors. Understanding these influences may help inform culturally responsive approaches to pain management. Given the small sample and qualitative design, the findings provide an exploratory account rather than evidence of population-level differences between Chinese and British populations.
ER -