Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 54 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0BMC Emergency Medicine

Emergency department providers’ perspectives on patients’ use of cannabis: therapeutic potential, risks, and prescribing experience

  • Lisa Moore1
  • Justin Gawaziuk1
  • Shaan Sareen1
  • Brenda Comaskey1
  • Rae Spiwak1,2
  • Sarvesh Logsetty1,3,4
4 affiliations
  1. 1Department of Surgery, Max Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
  2. 2Manitoba Centre for Health Policy, Max Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB Canada
  3. 3Department of Psychiatry, Max Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB Canada
  4. 4Department of Pediatrics and Child Health, Max Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB Canada
Read full textDOICite

Abstract

Background: Cannabis legalization in Canada has increased both therapeutic and recreational use. Emergency department (ED) providers encounter patients using cannabis recreationally, to self-manage symptoms, or under medical authorization, often without a clear distinction between these contexts at the point of care. However, provider attitudes toward cannabis in the emergency setting remain poorly understood, and no Canadian studies have specifically explored this group. This knowledge gap limits the development of clinical guidance and education for ED staff.

Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional survey of physicians and nurses working in the Adult Emergency Department at the Health Sciences Centre (HSC), Winnipeg, Manitoba, from October 2024 to February 2025. The survey evaluated attitudes toward legalization and medical use, perceived legal, social, and health risks, and prescribing experience. Descriptive statistics were used. Survey reporting followed best practice guidelines.

Results: Forty-five providers completed the survey. Most (71.1%) supported legalization, and 86.7% believed cannabis has therapeutic value. Nearly all (95.6%) agreed that eligible patients should have access to cannabis. Legal (91.1%) and social (77.3%) risks were perceived as low, while views on health risks varied; 38.6% perceived moderate or high health risks. No participants had prescribed cannabis, although 42.2% were in prescribing roles.

Conclusion: This is the first study to examine Canadian ED provider attitudes toward cannabis. While most respondents supported legalization (71.1%) and endorsed the therapeutic potential of cannabis (86.7%), with nearly all (95.6%) agreeing that eligible patients should have access, prescribing experience was limited, and many of those surveyed held uncertain or mixed views on cannabis safety, particularly relative to prescription pain medications. These findings highlight the need for targeted education, clinical tools, and evidence-based guidance to support cannabis-related care in emergency settings.

Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-026-01710-9.

Related

  1. The experience of cross-setting care transitions of long-term care residents to the emergency department: a qualitative study.
    Pin-Chieh Hsu, Lu-Yen Anny Chen, Yu-Chi Chen +2
    BMC geriatricsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMCPMC
  2. Patient Perspectives on Offers of Buprenorphine in the Emergency Department
    Lindsey K. Jennings, Kelly Barth, Suzanne Lane +10
    JAMA Network OpenPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Epidemiology & public healthCrossref
  3. Efficiency and Humanism: The Impact of the Humanistic Charting Tool on Patient Experience in the Emergency Department.
    Namrata Garg, Omid Boozarpour, Jose Alaras +3
    The western journal of emergency medicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  4. Automated Calculation of the Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN) Intra-Abdominal Injury Rule from Unstructured Emergency Department Notes Using a Large Language Model
    Leisha Devisetti, Belinda Chen, Newton Addo +5
    Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians openPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  5. Emergency Department Management of Ankle Fractures: A Narrative Review
    Micah Ngatuvai, Francis Villarreal, Victor M Vasquez +3
    CureusPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC

Cite

BibTeXRIS
BibTeX
@article{moore2026emergency,
  title = {{Emergency department providers’ perspectives on patients’ use of cannabis: therapeutic potential, risks, and prescribing experience}},
  author = {Lisa Moore and Justin Gawaziuk and Shaan Sareen and Brenda Comaskey and Rae Spiwak and Sarvesh Logsetty},
  journal = {BMC Emergency Medicine},
  year = {2026},
  month = aug,
  doi = {10.1186/s12873-026-01710-9},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-026-01710-9},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Emergency department providers’ perspectives on patients’ use of cannabis: therapeutic potential, risks, and prescribing experience
AU  - Lisa Moore
AU  - Justin Gawaziuk
AU  - Shaan Sareen
AU  - Brenda Comaskey
AU  - Rae Spiwak
AU  - Sarvesh Logsetty
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/08/07
JO  - BMC Emergency Medicine
DO  - 10.1186/s12873-026-01710-9
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-026-01710-9
AB  - Background: Cannabis legalization in Canada has increased both therapeutic and recreational use. Emergency department (ED) providers encounter patients using cannabis recreationally, to self-manage symptoms, or under medical authorization, often without a clear distinction between these contexts at the point of care. However, provider attitudes toward cannabis in the emergency setting remain poorly understood, and no Canadian studies have specifically explored this group. This knowledge gap limits the development of clinical guidance and education for ED staff.  Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional survey of physicians and nurses working in the Adult Emergency Department at the Health Sciences Centre (HSC), Winnipeg, Manitoba, from October 2024 to February 2025. The survey evaluated attitudes toward legalization and medical use, perceived legal, social, and health risks, and prescribing experience. Descriptive statistics were used. Survey reporting followed best practice guidelines.  Results: Forty-five providers completed the survey. Most (71.1%) supported legalization, and 86.7% believed cannabis has therapeutic value. Nearly all (95.6%) agreed that eligible patients should have access to cannabis. Legal (91.1%) and social (77.3%) risks were perceived as low, while views on health risks varied; 38.6% perceived moderate or high health risks. No participants had prescribed cannabis, although 42.2% were in prescribing roles.  Conclusion: This is the first study to examine Canadian ED provider attitudes toward cannabis. While most respondents supported legalization (71.1%) and endorsed the therapeutic potential of cannabis (86.7%), with nearly all (95.6%) agreeing that eligible patients should have access, prescribing experience was limited, and many of those surveyed held uncertain or mixed views on cannabis safety, particularly relative to prescription pain medications. These findings highlight the need for targeted education, clinical tools, and evidence-based guidance to support cannabis-related care in emergency settings.  Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-026-01710-9.
SN  - 1471-227X
ER  -