Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 43 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0The European Journal of Public Health

Systematic review of the effectiveness of heat-health protection interventions

Abstract

Background: Due to increases in the frequency and intensity of extreme heat, interventions are needed to reduce heat-related mortality, morbidity, and demand for emergency services. However, evidence on the effectiveness of heat-protection measures is missing.

Methods: Following a protocol, which was co-produced with an international expert panel (CRD420251020849), we conducted a systematic review. We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Google Scholar from inception to February 2026, and grey literature. Experimental and observational studies assessing the effect of heat-protection interventions on mortality, morbidity and emergency demand in the general population or in heat-vulnerable groups were included. Risk of bias was assessed with the JBI checklist. Where studies were sufficiently comparable, we conducted random-effects meta-analysis; otherwise, findings were synthesised narratively.

Results: Of 32,149 records screened, 49 studies were included. Most studies evaluated complex interventions, particularly heat-health action plans (HHAP; n = 18) and heat warning systems (HWS=12). Fewer studies assessed urban and building planning measures, education and awareness campaigns, community interventions, occupational interventions, and emergency preparedness measures. Mortality was the outcome reported most. In meta-analysis of pre–post studies, HHAP implementation was associated with reduced mortality risk (RR = 0·93 [95% CI 0·89; 0·99], p < 0·05). Evidence for HWS was inconsistent. Three studies suggested that air conditioning in public institutions was associated with lower mortality risk than no air conditioning. Evidence for other interventions was limited or inconsistent.

Conclusions: Comprehensive HHAP appear to reduce heat-related mortality, but evidence for HWS alone and other intervention types remains limited. More rigorous evaluations are needed, particularly for morbidity, emergency service demand, and in low-resource settings.

Key messages: • Heat–health action plans are associated with reductions in mortality, with some evidence indicating that these effects may be stronger among older populations.

• These findings support current policy recommendations, emphasising comprehensive, multi-component approaches to heat adaptation.

Related

  1. Effectiveness of green health prescribing and nature-based interventions in primary care and community settings for older adults: a systematic review of health, wellbeing and social outcomes
    Furqan Butt, Jeremiah Donoghue, Cameron Ley +10
    BMC MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textPharmacology & toxicologyCrossref
  2. Effectiveness of mobile health interventions for promoting moderate-to-vigorous physical activity in children and adolescents: systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Binping Gong, Da Wang, Xinyu Chen +2
    BMC public healthPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textEpidemiology & public healthEurope PMCPMCDOAJ
  3. Effectiveness of health literacy interventions using digital communications in the European Union: a systematic review
    Emīlija Anna Šakare, Samanta Terēze Spirģe, Ágnes Lublóy
    BMC Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEpidemiology & public healthDOAJ
  4. Effectiveness of dynamic neuromuscular stabilization-based interventions for nonspecific low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yuanyuan Ma, Yonghuan Chen, Jae Chul Seo +3
    Frontiers in medicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  5. Effectiveness of multicomponent interventions for children and adolescents with overweight or obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Xinyue Wang, Ju Yang, Jiai Yan +5
    BMC Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Epidemiology & public healthCrossref
BibTeX
@article{frevert2026systematic,
  title = {{Systematic review of the effectiveness of heat-health protection interventions}},
  author = {A Frevert and M Andreas and M Mahani and F Brune and S Busalt and V Araújo-Soares and N Mezger and F Matthies-Wiesler and FF Sniehotta},
  journal = {The European Journal of Public Health},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.183},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.183},
  note = {CC BY-NC 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Systematic review of the effectiveness of heat-health protection interventions
AU  - A Frevert
AU  - M Andreas
AU  - M Mahani
AU  - F Brune
AU  - S Busalt
AU  - V Araújo-Soares
AU  - N Mezger
AU  - F Matthies-Wiesler
AU  - FF Sniehotta
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/01
JO  - The European Journal of Public Health
DO  - 10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.183
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.183
AB  - Background: Due to increases in the frequency and intensity of extreme heat, interventions are needed to reduce heat-related mortality, morbidity, and demand for emergency services. However, evidence on the effectiveness of heat-protection measures is missing.  Methods: Following a protocol, which was co-produced with an international expert panel (CRD420251020849), we conducted a systematic review. We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Google Scholar from inception to February 2026, and grey literature. Experimental and observational studies assessing the effect of heat-protection interventions on mortality, morbidity and emergency demand in the general population or in heat-vulnerable groups were included. Risk of bias was assessed with the JBI checklist. Where studies were sufficiently comparable, we conducted random-effects meta-analysis; otherwise, findings were synthesised narratively.  Results: Of 32,149 records screened, 49 studies were included. Most studies evaluated complex interventions, particularly heat-health action plans (HHAP; n = 18) and heat warning systems (HWS=12). Fewer studies assessed urban and building planning measures, education and awareness campaigns, community interventions, occupational interventions, and emergency preparedness measures. Mortality was the outcome reported most. In meta-analysis of pre–post studies, HHAP implementation was associated with reduced mortality risk (RR = 0·93 [95% CI 0·89; 0·99], p < 0·05). Evidence for HWS was inconsistent. Three studies suggested that air conditioning in public institutions was associated with lower mortality risk than no air conditioning. Evidence for other interventions was limited or inconsistent.  Conclusions: Comprehensive HHAP appear to reduce heat-related mortality, but evidence for HWS alone and other intervention types remains limited. More rigorous evaluations are needed, particularly for morbidity, emergency service demand, and in low-resource settings.  Key messages: • Heat–health action plans are associated with reductions in mortality, with some evidence indicating that these effects may be stronger among older populations.  • These findings support current policy recommendations, emphasising comprehensive, multi-component approaches to heat adaptation.
SN  - 1101-1262
SN  - 1464-360X
ER  -