Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 58 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYHolistic Integrative Oncology

Synergistic strategies of tumor ablation and immunotherapy in hepatocellular carcinoma: mechanisms, clinical translation, and perspectives

  1. 1Mini-invasive Interventional Therapy Center, Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University

Abstract

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains the third leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide, accounting for over 85% of primary liver cancers. Locoregional ablation techniques—encompassing thermal modalities such as radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and microwave ablation (MWA), and non-thermal approaches including cryoablation (CA) and irreversible electroporation (IRE)—have been established as standard-of-care options for early-stage HCC. Ablation induces immunogenic cell death (ICD), releasing tumor-associated antigens (TAAs) and damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) that prime antitumor immunity; however, this response is transient and insufficient to overcome the immunosuppressive tumor immune microenvironment (TIME), necessitating combination with immunotherapy. While preclinical evidence supports ablation-immunotherapy synergy across multiple platforms, robust phase III clinical data demonstrating survival benefit remain limited. This review systematically summarizes the immunological mechanisms underlying tumor ablation, and primarily discusses: (1) Modality-specific immune profiles—thermal ablation induces broad DAMP release but is limited by antigen denaturation and by incomplete ablation (iRFA), which associates with SUMO2-mediated IFN-I suppression, whereas non-thermal modalities (CA, IRE) preserve antigen conformation and engage multiple regulated cell death pathways; (2) Comprehensive combination strategies addressing three immunological barriers: innate APC licensing (PRR agonists, STING, GM-CSF, nanobiomaterials), T cell priming and trafficking (immune checkpoint inhibitors and adoptive cell therapy), and systemic memory durability (oncolytic viruses); (3) Critical mechanistic barriers to clinical translation: iRFA paradoxically couples residual tumor substrate with immunosuppression; the post-ablation immune activation window (3–14 days) remains clinically unexploited; and mechanistic understanding substantially outpaces clinical validation. Collectively, these advances support the continued development of personalized and precision-guided ablation–immunotherapy strategies for HCC.

Related

  1. Correlation between circulating tumor cell levels and tumor response in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing immunotherapy and molecular targeted therapy
    Jiangmin Zhou, Huifang Xiong, Honghao Zhou +2
    Frontiers in oncologyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textOncologyEurope PMC
  2. Targeting the Tumor Microenvironment Network to Overcome Immunotherapy Resistance in Non‐Small Cell Lung Cancer: Mechanisms to Clinical Translation
    Zengrui Wang, Zhuang Luo, Le Wang +3
    Cancer medicinePeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  3. Fe-doped polydopamine pickering emulsion as a nanoplatform for synergistic photothermal-ferroptosis immunotherapy in breast cancer
    Ling-Yu Xu, Peng Zhang, Min-Jing Yu +3
    Frontiers in PharmacologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textPharmacology & toxicologyCrossrefEurope PMC
  4. Cellular immunotherapy for lung cancer: current clinical evidence, translational challenges, and future perspectives: a narrative review
    Nannan Ma, Chunxiang Shang
    Translational cancer researchPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  5. Prediction of Response to Immunotherapy in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Where Do We Stand?
    Mariana Verdelho Machado
    CancersPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textOncologyEurope PMCCrossref
BibTeX
@article{liu2026synergistic,
  title = {{Synergistic strategies of tumor ablation and immunotherapy in hepatocellular carcinoma: mechanisms, clinical translation, and perspectives}},
  author = {Ying Liu and Linke Bian and Hongye Wang and Dan Cui and Zhaorong Wu and Bo Zhai},
  journal = {Holistic Integrative Oncology},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1007/s44178-026-00303-7},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s44178-026-00303-7},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Synergistic strategies of tumor ablation and immunotherapy in hepatocellular carcinoma: mechanisms, clinical translation, and perspectives
AU  - Ying Liu
AU  - Linke Bian
AU  - Hongye Wang
AU  - Dan Cui
AU  - Zhaorong Wu
AU  - Bo Zhai
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/25
JO  - Holistic Integrative Oncology
DO  - 10.1007/s44178-026-00303-7
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1007/s44178-026-00303-7
AB  - Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains the third leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide, accounting for over 85% of primary liver cancers. Locoregional ablation techniques—encompassing thermal modalities such as radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and microwave ablation (MWA), and non-thermal approaches including cryoablation (CA) and irreversible electroporation (IRE)—have been established as standard-of-care options for early-stage HCC. Ablation induces immunogenic cell death (ICD), releasing tumor-associated antigens (TAAs) and damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) that prime antitumor immunity; however, this response is transient and insufficient to overcome the immunosuppressive tumor immune microenvironment (TIME), necessitating combination with immunotherapy. While preclinical evidence supports ablation-immunotherapy synergy across multiple platforms, robust phase III clinical data demonstrating survival benefit remain limited. This review systematically summarizes the immunological mechanisms underlying tumor ablation, and primarily discusses: (1) Modality-specific immune profiles—thermal ablation induces broad DAMP release but is limited by antigen denaturation and by incomplete ablation (iRFA), which associates with SUMO2-mediated IFN-I suppression, whereas non-thermal modalities (CA, IRE) preserve antigen conformation and engage multiple regulated cell death pathways; (2) Comprehensive combination strategies addressing three immunological barriers: innate APC licensing (PRR agonists, STING, GM-CSF, nanobiomaterials), T cell priming and trafficking (immune checkpoint inhibitors and adoptive cell therapy), and systemic memory durability (oncolytic viruses); (3) Critical mechanistic barriers to clinical translation: iRFA paradoxically couples residual tumor substrate with immunosuppression; the post-ablation immune activation window (3–14 days) remains clinically unexploited; and mechanistic understanding substantially outpaces clinical validation. Collectively, these advances support the continued development of personalized and precision-guided ablation–immunotherapy strategies for HCC.
SN  - 2731-4529
ER  -