Acculturation as a Situated Transactional Process
Abstract
Acculturation research commonly links broad preferences for heritage-culture maintenance and participation in the receiving society to psychological and sociocultural adjustment. Yet meta-analytic and longitudinal evidence shows that these associations are often weak, heterogeneous, and limited over time, suggesting that broad preferences alone cannot explain why cultural engagement leads to different outcomes across situations. This conceptual article develops a situated transactional framework within a broader complex dynamic systems account. Building on established work showing that acculturation is contextual, domain-specific, and interactional, the framework specifies how these influences come together within concrete encounters. It proposes a process in which locally relevant conditions shape appraisal, the mobilization of culturally patterned resources, response, relational and institutional reception, multidimensional outcomes, and feedback into later encounters. The article also distinguishes the adaptation process, understood as the continuing person-environment transaction, from adaptation outcomes, including psychological, sociocultural, relational, and externally observed consequences. By organizing these elements into an explicit recursive architecture, the framework generates testable predictions about context-specific responses, reception, multidimensional outcomes, learned response patterns, and structural change. It thereby provides a concrete empirical agenda for testing whether these mechanisms improve explanation and prediction beyond broad-orientation and contextual-moderation accounts.
Related
- The Acculturation-Deculturation Dialectic at the Heart of ICT Teacher Training Programs
- Enhancing credit risk scorecards with transactional-based behavioural features
- Reproducibility is not construct validity: LLM measurement of institutionally situated communication
- The Renormalization Group as a Stochastic Exploration Process
- Interacting Quantum Symmetric Exclusion Process
BibTeX
@misc{abacioglu2026acculturation,
title = {{Acculturation as a Situated Transactional Process}},
author = {Ceren Su Abacioglu},
howpublished = {PsyArXiv},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.31234/osf.io/azbfe_v2},
url = {https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/azbfe_v2/},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Acculturation as a Situated Transactional Process
AU - Ceren Su Abacioglu
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/17
PB - PsyArXiv
DO - 10.31234/osf.io/azbfe_v2
UR - https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/azbfe_v2/
AB - Acculturation research commonly links broad preferences for heritage-culture maintenance and participation in the receiving society to psychological and sociocultural adjustment. Yet meta-analytic and longitudinal evidence shows that these associations are often weak, heterogeneous, and limited over time, suggesting that broad preferences alone cannot explain why cultural engagement leads to different outcomes across situations. This conceptual article develops a situated transactional framework within a broader complex dynamic systems account. Building on established work showing that acculturation is contextual, domain-specific, and interactional, the framework specifies how these influences come together within concrete encounters. It proposes a process in which locally relevant conditions shape appraisal, the mobilization of culturally patterned resources, response, relational and institutional reception, multidimensional outcomes, and feedback into later encounters. The article also distinguishes the adaptation process, understood as the continuing person-environment transaction, from adaptation outcomes, including psychological, sociocultural, relational, and externally observed consequences. By organizing these elements into an explicit recursive architecture, the framework generates testable predictions about context-specific responses, reception, multidimensional outcomes, learned response patterns, and structural change. It thereby provides a concrete empirical agenda for testing whether these mechanisms improve explanation and prediction beyond broad-orientation and contextual-moderation accounts.
ER -