Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 14 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0World Journal of Pediatric Surgery

Efficacy and safety of internal traction in long-gap esophageal atresia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

5 more authors
8 affiliations
  1. 1Rawalpindi Medical University, Rawalpindi, Pakistan
  2. 2Foundation University Medical College, Islamabad, Pakistan
  3. 3Services Institute of Medical Sciences, Lahore, Pakistan
  4. 4Islamic International Medical College, Riphah International University, Rawalpindi, Pakistan
  5. 5Tbilisi State Medical University, Tbilisi, Georgia
  6. 6Federal Medical and Dental College, Islamabad, Pakistan
  7. 7Khyber Medical University, Peshawar, Pakistan
  8. 8Fatima Jinnah Medical University, Lahore, Pakistan

Abstract

Background: Long-gap esophageal atresia (LGEA) presents a significant surgical challenge due to the extensive gap precluding tension-free primary repair. Internal traction offers a potentially safer, esophagus-preserving alternative to external traction (Foker) techniques by avoiding prolonged sedation and ventilation. However, evidence is limited to small case series.

Methods: We searched several databases, such as PubMed, Embase, and Scopus, through October 4, 2025. Eight single-arm studies (122 patients) met inclusion criteria. Pooled proportions were calculated using random-effects models with Freeman-Tukey double arcsine transformation; heterogeneity was assessed via I² statistics.

Results: Internal traction achieved delayed primary anastomosis in 92% of patients (95% confidence interval (CI=80%–99%; I²=21.1%), with 90% achieving full oral feeding (95% CI=58%–100%). Esophageal replacement was rare (5%) and mortality low (5%). However, morbidity was substantial: gastroesophageal reflux occurred in 73% of patients, stricture requiring dilation in 46%, postoperative stenosis in 52%, and anastomotic leak in 28%. Complication rates directly attributable to internal traction were 28%, with fundoplication required in 22% of patients. Heterogeneity was moderate to substantial for several secondary outcomes.

Conclusion: Internal traction is a promising organ-preserving approach for LGEA, with high anastomotic success but substantial reflux- and stricture-related morbidity. Prospective, multicenter studies with standardized outcome definitions and comparator groups are needed to define its optimal role in LGEA management.

PROSPERO registration number: CRD420251161975.

Related

  1. Innervation, Motility Peptide, and Extracellular Matrix Remodeling Markers in Proximal and Distal Esophageal Tissue from Children with Esophageal Atresia
    Veronika Kulineca, Māra Pilmane, Aigars Petersons
    Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  2. Functional characterization of a non-coding RUNX1T1 variant in a kindred with esophageal atresia
    Nadav Agam, Sarit Aharoni, Baruch Yerushalmi +15
    OrganogenesisPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textSurgery & anaesthesiaPMC
  3. High-resolution 3D micro-CT reveals an additional muscle layer in esophageal atresia
    Daniel Docter, Anastasia Ioannidou, Bernadette de Bakker +9
    EsophagusPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textSurgery & anaesthesiaPMC
  4. Learning Curve and Early Outcomes of Thoracoscopic Esophageal Atresia Repair in an Emerging Pediatric Minimally Invasive Surgery (MIS) Program: A Cumulative Sum Analysis
    Andreea Moga, Patricia Cîmpeanu, Laura Bălănescu +1
    Children (Basel, Switzerland)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textSurgery & anaesthesiaEurope PMCDOAJ
  5. Comparative efficacy of esophageal protection strategies during radiofrequency atrial fibrillation ablation: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized trials.
    Akam Ramezani, Naghmeh Kian, Amirmohammad Sharafi +5
    BMC cardiovascular disordersPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textCardiovascular medicineEurope PMCPMC
BibTeX
@article{bibi2026efficacy,
  title = {{Efficacy and safety of internal traction in long-gap esophageal atresia: a systematic review and meta-analysis}},
  author = {Arooj Bibi and Muhammad Aatir Aslam and Ali Amjad and Jannat Yusuf and Hareema Tabassum and Isra Laeeq and Laiba Saleem and Rayyan Mohammad Makki Bakhsh and Faiza Hayat Qadri and Afnan Javed and Ayesha Khuram and Samar Tariq and Ayesha Akbar and Aiman Farheen and Haider Imran and Haseeb Sadaqat and Tuba Shakoor},
  journal = {World Journal of Pediatric Surgery},
  year = {2026},
  month = nov,
  doi = {10.1136/wjps-2026-001219},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1136/wjps-2026-001219},
  note = {CC BY-NC 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Efficacy and safety of internal traction in long-gap esophageal atresia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
AU  - Arooj Bibi
AU  - Muhammad Aatir Aslam
AU  - Ali Amjad
AU  - Jannat Yusuf
AU  - Hareema Tabassum
AU  - Isra Laeeq
AU  - Laiba Saleem
AU  - Rayyan Mohammad Makki Bakhsh
AU  - Faiza Hayat Qadri
AU  - Afnan Javed
AU  - Ayesha Khuram
AU  - Samar Tariq
AU  - Ayesha Akbar
AU  - Aiman Farheen
AU  - Haider Imran
AU  - Haseeb Sadaqat
AU  - Tuba Shakoor
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/11/04
JO  - World Journal of Pediatric Surgery
DO  - 10.1136/wjps-2026-001219
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1136/wjps-2026-001219
AB  - Background: Long-gap esophageal atresia (LGEA) presents a significant surgical challenge due to the extensive gap precluding tension-free primary repair. Internal traction offers a potentially safer, esophagus-preserving alternative to external traction (Foker) techniques by avoiding prolonged sedation and ventilation. However, evidence is limited to small case series.  Methods: We searched several databases, such as PubMed, Embase, and Scopus, through October 4, 2025. Eight single-arm studies (122 patients) met inclusion criteria. Pooled proportions were calculated using random-effects models with Freeman-Tukey double arcsine transformation; heterogeneity was assessed via I² statistics.  Results: Internal traction achieved delayed primary anastomosis in 92% of patients (95% confidence interval (CI=80%–99%; I²=21.1%), with 90% achieving full oral feeding (95% CI=58%–100%). Esophageal replacement was rare (5%) and mortality low (5%). However, morbidity was substantial: gastroesophageal reflux occurred in 73% of patients, stricture requiring dilation in 46%, postoperative stenosis in 52%, and anastomotic leak in 28%. Complication rates directly attributable to internal traction were 28%, with fundoplication required in 22% of patients. Heterogeneity was moderate to substantial for several secondary outcomes.  Conclusion: Internal traction is a promising organ-preserving approach for LGEA, with high anastomotic success but substantial reflux- and stricture-related morbidity. Prospective, multicenter studies with standardized outcome definitions and comparator groups are needed to define its optimal role in LGEA management.  PROSPERO registration number: CRD420251161975.
SN  - 2096-6938
SN  - 2516-5410
ER  -