Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,203 studies31 sourcesUpdated 32 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Scientific Reports

In-race continuous glucose monitoring in highly trained male distance runners: a context-dependent reversal of the glucose–performance association between training and competition

Abstract

To characterize in-race interstitial glucose dynamics in highly trained male distance runners using continuous glucose monitoring (CGM), and to test whether the direction of the glucose–performance association differs between actual competition and race-pace training. Fifty-nine highly trained (McKay Tier 3) male distance runners from three collegiate squads wore flash CGM during 203 race-pace training sessions and 116 officially sanctioned races. Glucose was modelled with linear mixed-effects models including the athlete as a random intercept. Performance was defined in both conditions as attainment of a pre-established coach–athlete goal time, and additionally on a continuous rating scale within each condition. Because the two conditions were contributed by largely different athletes, the analysis was repeated in the 14 athletes observed in both. Glucose ran far higher in competition than in training (during-exercise average 193.1 ± 39.1 vs. 127.8 ± 27.3 mg/dL), and the separation was already present 2 h before the event began. The association with performance ran in opposite directions in the two contexts: athletes who met their goal time had lower glucose than those who did not during training (− 20.3 mg/dL, 95% CI − 29.9 to − 10.8), but higher glucose during competition (+ 33.3 mg/dL, 95% CI 19.2 to 47.4), an interaction of + 52.4 mg/dL (95% CI 36.1 to 68.8). About half of that difference was established before the start, and the interaction remained after adjustment for pre-exercise glucose (+ 28.5 mg/dL, 95% CI 16.4 to 40.6). It also held in the 14 athletes observed in both conditions (+ 41.9 mg/dL, 95% CI 13.8 to 70.0), although their competition-side association alone was not significant. In-race carbohydrate intake was not measured; excluding the races in which it was permitted did not materially alter the association, and neither did adjustment for event duration. Competition is accompanied by a large interstitial glucose elevation, and glucose relates to goal attainment in opposite directions in competition and in training. These data are consistent with a stress-related increase in hepatic glucose mobilization but cannot separate it from differences in exercise intensity, pre-event nutrition or other competition-specific factors, and the two conditions were contributed by largely different athletes. CGM nonetheless makes in-competition metabolic physiology directly observable in the field.

Related

  1. Performance and Safety of a Continuous Glucose Monitoring System in Pregnant Women With Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Multicenter, Open-Label Trial
    Jie Shen, Huiling Shang, Weiwei Zhu +1
    Journal of Diabetes Science and TechnologyPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull textObstetrics, gynaecology & paediatricsPMC
  2. Real-world accuracy, extended-wear performance, and user satisfaction with a novel 21-day continuous glucose monitoring system in pediatric type 1 diabetes.
    Erdal Eren, Yasemin Denkboy Ongen, Burcu Eryilmaz +2
    BMJ open diabetes research & carePeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textEndocrinology & metabolismEurope PMC
  3. Performance of a 15-Day Continuous Glucose Monitoring System in Children and Adolescents With Diabetes.
    Manuela Link, Christian Denzer, Torben Biester +9
    Journal of diabetes science and technologyPeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textEndocrinology & metabolismEurope PMC
  4. Association Between Continuous Glucose Monitoring - Derived Time in Range and Diabetic Kidney Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of current evidence
    S. M. Lodha, S. Kumar, S. Acharya +2
    medRxivPreprintCC BY-NC-NDFull textEndocrinology & metabolismmedRxiv
  5. Association of an almond-based low-carbohydrate diet with continuous glucose monitoring metrics in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized controlled trial.
    Xianming Li, Yanqin Xu, Xulin Wang +3
    Nutrition & diabetesPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textPhysiologyEurope PMCDOAJ
BibTeX
@article{kajisa2026inrace,
  title = {{In-race continuous glucose monitoring in highly trained male distance runners: a context-dependent reversal of the glucose–performance association between training and competition}},
  author = {Taira Kajisa and Toshiyuki Sakai},
  journal = {Scientific Reports},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1038/s41598-026-74914-5},
  url = {https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-026-74914-5},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - In-race continuous glucose monitoring in highly trained male distance runners: a context-dependent reversal of the glucose–performance association between training and competition
AU  - Taira Kajisa
AU  - Toshiyuki Sakai
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/08
JO  - Scientific Reports
DO  - 10.1038/s41598-026-74914-5
UR  - https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-026-74914-5
AB  - To characterize in-race interstitial glucose dynamics in highly trained male distance runners using continuous glucose monitoring (CGM), and to test whether the direction of the glucose–performance association differs between actual competition and race-pace training. Fifty-nine highly trained (McKay Tier 3) male distance runners from three collegiate squads wore flash CGM during 203 race-pace training sessions and 116 officially sanctioned races. Glucose was modelled with linear mixed-effects models including the athlete as a random intercept. Performance was defined in both conditions as attainment of a pre-established coach–athlete goal time, and additionally on a continuous rating scale within each condition. Because the two conditions were contributed by largely different athletes, the analysis was repeated in the 14 athletes observed in both. Glucose ran far higher in competition than in training (during-exercise average 193.1 ± 39.1 vs. 127.8 ± 27.3 mg/dL), and the separation was already present 2 h before the event began. The association with performance ran in opposite directions in the two contexts: athletes who met their goal time had lower glucose than those who did not during training (− 20.3 mg/dL, 95% CI − 29.9 to − 10.8), but higher glucose during competition (+ 33.3 mg/dL, 95% CI 19.2 to 47.4), an interaction of + 52.4 mg/dL (95% CI 36.1 to 68.8). About half of that difference was established before the start, and the interaction remained after adjustment for pre-exercise glucose (+ 28.5 mg/dL, 95% CI 16.4 to 40.6). It also held in the 14 athletes observed in both conditions (+ 41.9 mg/dL, 95% CI 13.8 to 70.0), although their competition-side association alone was not significant. In-race carbohydrate intake was not measured; excluding the races in which it was permitted did not materially alter the association, and neither did adjustment for event duration. Competition is accompanied by a large interstitial glucose elevation, and glucose relates to goal attainment in opposite directions in competition and in training. These data are consistent with a stress-related increase in hepatic glucose mobilization but cannot separate it from differences in exercise intensity, pre-event nutrition or other competition-specific factors, and the two conditions were contributed by largely different athletes. CGM nonetheless makes in-competition metabolic physiology directly observable in the field.
SN  - 2045-2322
ER  -