Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,203 studies31 sourcesUpdated 37 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention : APJCP

Comparing the Recurrence Patterns of Reduced-Margins vs. RTOG-Protocol in Adjuvant Chemoradiation of High-Grade Gliomas: A Multicenter, Open-Label, Randomized Controlled Trial

6 affiliations
  1. 1Cancer Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
  2. 2Non-Communicable Diseases Research Center, Sabzevar University of Medical Sciences, Sabzevar, Iran.
  3. 3Cancer Research Center, Health Research Institute, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran.
  4. 4Department of Public Health & Epidemiology, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
  5. 5Department of Neurological Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
  6. 6Reza Radiotherapy and Oncology Center, Mashhad, Iran.

Abstract

Background:: Radiotherapy following maximal-safe resection is a cornerstone of treatment for high-grade gliomas (HGGs). However, the optimal clinical target volume (CTV) margin remains controversial. This study aimed to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and recurrence patterns associated with a reduced CTV margin in patients with HGGs, compared to standard RTOG-based planning.

Methods:: In this multicenter, phase III randomized clinical trial, patients aged 18–75 years with newly diagnosed WHO-grade 3 or 4 gliomas were randomly assigned to receive adjuvant radiotherapy with either a standard 2-cm clinical target volume (CTV) margin (control group) or a reduced 1-cm margin (intervention group). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), while the secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS) and patterns of recurrence.

Results:: A total of 258 patients were enrolled, of whom 75.6% had grade 4 gliomas. After a median follow-up of 14.5 months, median PFS was 15 ± 1.25 months in the intervention group but it was 19 ± 2.71 months in the control group (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.32; 95% CI, 0.93–1.87; p = 0.121). Median OS was 22.0 ± 2.98 months in the intervention group, while it was not reached in the control group (HR = 1.52; 95% CI, 0.99–2.33; p = 0.057). Imaging progression occurred in 35% of patients in the intervention group and 32.2% in the control group (p = 0.637). In-field recurrence was the predominant pattern in both groups (84% vs. 83.8%; p = 0.829), with no significant increase in marginal or out-of-field failures associated with margin reduction.

Conclusion:: Reducing the clinical target volume (CTV) margin from 2 cm to 1 cm in the adjuvant radiotherapy of high-grade gliomas did not significantly affect progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), or recurrence patterns. These findings support the feasibility and safety of margin reduction, even in settings where three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) is the primary technique.

Related

  1. Prophylactic antibiotics for pancreaticoduodenectomy: study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing tazobactam/piperacillin versus ampicillin/sulbactam.
    Takuya Mizumoto, Yoshihide Nanno, Jun Ishida +9
    BMC surgeryPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textSurgery & anaesthesiaEurope PMCPMC
  2. A double-blind randomized controlled trial comparing intranasal dexmedetomidine with and without fentanyl for pediatric premedication
    Saowaphak Lapmahapaisan, Piyawan Koopredechat, Issada Jindawatthana +1
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textSurgery & anaesthesiaCrossref
  3. Study Protocol for the TIGHTEN Study Comparing the Effects of Tofogliflozin and Glimepiride on Skeletal Muscle Mass in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes without Obesity: A Prospective, Multicenter, Open-Label, Randomized, Parallel Group Trial in Japan
    Yasutaka Takeda, Tsubasa Ozawa, Maki Ikoma +5
    Diabetes TherapyPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0Full textEndocrinology & metabolismPMC
  4. Efficacy and safety of Anas barbariae 200K in influenza-like illness: a randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study
    M. GUPTA, A. TAJNE, P. CHAVAN +4
    medRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textPharmacology & toxicologymedRxiv
  5. DIalysis Symptom COntrol-Pruritus Outcome Trial (DISCO-POT): A Multicenter Randomized Blinded Placebo Controlled Crossover Trial
    David Collister, Rocio Ayala Romero, Kathy Cherepak +7
    Kidney medicinePeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{anvari2026comparing,
  title = {{Comparing the Recurrence Patterns of Reduced-Margins vs. RTOG-Protocol in Adjuvant Chemoradiation of High-Grade Gliomas: A Multicenter, Open-Label, Randomized Controlled Trial}},
  author = {Kazem Anvari and Seyed Alireza Javadinia and Danial Fazilat-Panah and Habibollah Esmaily and Seyed Amir Aledavood and Sudabeh Shahidsales and Babak Ganjeifar and Mahdieh Dayyani and Parisa Rabiei},
  journal = {Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention : APJCP},
  year = {2026},
  month = jun,
  doi = {10.31557/apjcp.2026.27.6.2005},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.31557/apjcp.2026.27.6.2005},
  note = {CC BY-NC 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Comparing the Recurrence Patterns of Reduced-Margins vs. RTOG-Protocol in Adjuvant Chemoradiation of High-Grade Gliomas: A Multicenter, Open-Label, Randomized Controlled Trial
AU  - Kazem Anvari
AU  - Seyed Alireza Javadinia
AU  - Danial Fazilat-Panah
AU  - Habibollah Esmaily
AU  - Seyed Amir Aledavood
AU  - Sudabeh Shahidsales
AU  - Babak Ganjeifar
AU  - Mahdieh Dayyani
AU  - Parisa Rabiei
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/06/18
JO  - Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention : APJCP
DO  - 10.31557/apjcp.2026.27.6.2005
UR  - https://doi.org/10.31557/apjcp.2026.27.6.2005
AB  - Background:: Radiotherapy following maximal-safe resection is a cornerstone of treatment for high-grade gliomas (HGGs). However, the optimal clinical target volume (CTV) margin remains controversial. This study aimed to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and recurrence patterns associated with a reduced CTV margin in patients with HGGs, compared to standard RTOG-based planning.  Methods:: In this multicenter, phase III randomized clinical trial, patients aged 18–75 years with newly diagnosed WHO-grade 3 or 4 gliomas were randomly assigned to receive adjuvant radiotherapy with either a standard 2-cm clinical target volume (CTV) margin (control group) or a reduced 1-cm margin (intervention group). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), while the secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS) and patterns of recurrence.  Results:: A total of 258 patients were enrolled, of whom 75.6% had grade 4 gliomas. After a median follow-up of 14.5 months, median PFS was 15 ± 1.25 months in the intervention group but it was 19 ± 2.71 months in the control group (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.32; 95% CI, 0.93–1.87; p = 0.121). Median OS was 22.0 ± 2.98 months in the intervention group, while it was not reached in the control group (HR = 1.52; 95% CI, 0.99–2.33; p = 0.057). Imaging progression occurred in 35% of patients in the intervention group and 32.2% in the control group (p = 0.637). In-field recurrence was the predominant pattern in both groups (84% vs. 83.8%; p = 0.829), with no significant increase in marginal or out-of-field failures associated with margin reduction.  Conclusion:: Reducing the clinical target volume (CTV) margin from 2 cm to 1 cm in the adjuvant radiotherapy of high-grade gliomas did not significantly affect progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), or recurrence patterns. These findings support the feasibility and safety of margin reduction, even in settings where three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) is the primary technique.
SN  - 1513-7368
SN  - 2476-762X
ER  -