Comparing the Recurrence Patterns of Reduced-Margins vs. RTOG-Protocol in Adjuvant Chemoradiation of High-Grade Gliomas: A Multicenter, Open-Label, Randomized Controlled Trial
6 affiliations
- 1Cancer Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
- 2Non-Communicable Diseases Research Center, Sabzevar University of Medical Sciences, Sabzevar, Iran.
- 3Cancer Research Center, Health Research Institute, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran.
- 4Department of Public Health & Epidemiology, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
- 5Department of Neurological Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
- 6Reza Radiotherapy and Oncology Center, Mashhad, Iran.
Abstract
Background:: Radiotherapy following maximal-safe resection is a cornerstone of treatment for high-grade gliomas (HGGs). However, the optimal clinical target volume (CTV) margin remains controversial. This study aimed to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and recurrence patterns associated with a reduced CTV margin in patients with HGGs, compared to standard RTOG-based planning.
Methods:: In this multicenter, phase III randomized clinical trial, patients aged 18–75 years with newly diagnosed WHO-grade 3 or 4 gliomas were randomly assigned to receive adjuvant radiotherapy with either a standard 2-cm clinical target volume (CTV) margin (control group) or a reduced 1-cm margin (intervention group). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), while the secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS) and patterns of recurrence.
Results:: A total of 258 patients were enrolled, of whom 75.6% had grade 4 gliomas. After a median follow-up of 14.5 months, median PFS was 15 ± 1.25 months in the intervention group but it was 19 ± 2.71 months in the control group (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.32; 95% CI, 0.93–1.87; p = 0.121). Median OS was 22.0 ± 2.98 months in the intervention group, while it was not reached in the control group (HR = 1.52; 95% CI, 0.99–2.33; p = 0.057). Imaging progression occurred in 35% of patients in the intervention group and 32.2% in the control group (p = 0.637). In-field recurrence was the predominant pattern in both groups (84% vs. 83.8%; p = 0.829), with no significant increase in marginal or out-of-field failures associated with margin reduction.
Conclusion:: Reducing the clinical target volume (CTV) margin from 2 cm to 1 cm in the adjuvant radiotherapy of high-grade gliomas did not significantly affect progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), or recurrence patterns. These findings support the feasibility and safety of margin reduction, even in settings where three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) is the primary technique.
Related
- Prophylactic antibiotics for pancreaticoduodenectomy: study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing tazobactam/piperacillin versus ampicillin/sulbactam.
- A double-blind randomized controlled trial comparing intranasal dexmedetomidine with and without fentanyl for pediatric premedication
- Study Protocol for the TIGHTEN Study Comparing the Effects of Tofogliflozin and Glimepiride on Skeletal Muscle Mass in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes without Obesity: A Prospective, Multicenter, Open-Label, Randomized, Parallel Group Trial in Japan
- Efficacy and safety of Anas barbariae 200K in influenza-like illness: a randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study
- DIalysis Symptom COntrol-Pruritus Outcome Trial (DISCO-POT): A Multicenter Randomized Blinded Placebo Controlled Crossover Trial
BibTeX
@article{anvari2026comparing,
title = {{Comparing the Recurrence Patterns of Reduced-Margins vs. RTOG-Protocol in Adjuvant Chemoradiation of High-Grade Gliomas: A Multicenter, Open-Label, Randomized Controlled Trial}},
author = {Kazem Anvari and Seyed Alireza Javadinia and Danial Fazilat-Panah and Habibollah Esmaily and Seyed Amir Aledavood and Sudabeh Shahidsales and Babak Ganjeifar and Mahdieh Dayyani and Parisa Rabiei},
journal = {Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention : APJCP},
year = {2026},
month = jun,
doi = {10.31557/apjcp.2026.27.6.2005},
url = {https://doi.org/10.31557/apjcp.2026.27.6.2005},
note = {CC BY-NC 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Comparing the Recurrence Patterns of Reduced-Margins vs. RTOG-Protocol in Adjuvant Chemoradiation of High-Grade Gliomas: A Multicenter, Open-Label, Randomized Controlled Trial
AU - Kazem Anvari
AU - Seyed Alireza Javadinia
AU - Danial Fazilat-Panah
AU - Habibollah Esmaily
AU - Seyed Amir Aledavood
AU - Sudabeh Shahidsales
AU - Babak Ganjeifar
AU - Mahdieh Dayyani
AU - Parisa Rabiei
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/06/18
JO - Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention : APJCP
DO - 10.31557/apjcp.2026.27.6.2005
UR - https://doi.org/10.31557/apjcp.2026.27.6.2005
AB - Background:: Radiotherapy following maximal-safe resection is a cornerstone of treatment for high-grade gliomas (HGGs). However, the optimal clinical target volume (CTV) margin remains controversial. This study aimed to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and recurrence patterns associated with a reduced CTV margin in patients with HGGs, compared to standard RTOG-based planning. Methods:: In this multicenter, phase III randomized clinical trial, patients aged 18–75 years with newly diagnosed WHO-grade 3 or 4 gliomas were randomly assigned to receive adjuvant radiotherapy with either a standard 2-cm clinical target volume (CTV) margin (control group) or a reduced 1-cm margin (intervention group). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), while the secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS) and patterns of recurrence. Results:: A total of 258 patients were enrolled, of whom 75.6% had grade 4 gliomas. After a median follow-up of 14.5 months, median PFS was 15 ± 1.25 months in the intervention group but it was 19 ± 2.71 months in the control group (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.32; 95% CI, 0.93–1.87; p = 0.121). Median OS was 22.0 ± 2.98 months in the intervention group, while it was not reached in the control group (HR = 1.52; 95% CI, 0.99–2.33; p = 0.057). Imaging progression occurred in 35% of patients in the intervention group and 32.2% in the control group (p = 0.637). In-field recurrence was the predominant pattern in both groups (84% vs. 83.8%; p = 0.829), with no significant increase in marginal or out-of-field failures associated with margin reduction. Conclusion:: Reducing the clinical target volume (CTV) margin from 2 cm to 1 cm in the adjuvant radiotherapy of high-grade gliomas did not significantly affect progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), or recurrence patterns. These findings support the feasibility and safety of margin reduction, even in settings where three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) is the primary technique.
SN - 1513-7368
SN - 2476-762X
ER -