Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,203 studies31 sourcesUpdated 33 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Metabolites

Aerobic and Aerobic-Oriented Exercise for Anthropometric, Androgen-Related, and Reproductive Endocrine Outcomes in Polyendocrine Metabolic Ovarian Syndrome (Polycystic Ovary Syndrome): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

4 affiliations
  1. 1Department of Applied Psychology, School of Health Management, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 511436, China
  2. 2School of Physical Education and Training, Xi’an Physical Education University, No. 1 Dongcheng South Road, Huyi District, Xi’an 710399, China
  3. 3Nutrilite Health Institute, Amway R&D Center, 720 Cailun Road, Shanghai 201203, China
  4. 4College of Sports Training, Tianjin University of Sport, Tianjin 301617, China

Abstract

Background: Aerobic exercise is recommended within lifestyle management for polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), but its effects on anthropometric and endocrine outcomes remain inconsistent. Methods: Five databases were searched from inception through July 2026. Controlled trials of structured aerobic or aerobic-oriented exercise lasting at least four weeks were eligible when the comparator did not receive an exercise program expected to improve aerobic fitness. Between-group changes were expressed as Hedges’ g and pooled using random-effects models with cluster-robust small-sample inference. Subgroup, univariable meta-regression, and dose–response analyses were exploratory. Results: Twenty-two reports representing 20 independent trials were included. The pooled standardized estimate marginally favored exercise for body weight (g = −0.09, 95% CI −0.13 to −0.05), although its magnitude was trivial and the 95% prediction interval crossed the null (−0.29 to 0.11). Exercise was associated with lower body mass index (g = −0.20, 95% CI −0.33 to −0.06), waist-to-hip ratio (g = −0.36, 95% CI −0.56 to −0.19), total testosterone (g = −0.43, 95% CI −0.67 to −0.20), and free testosterone (g = −0.60, 95% CI −0.99 to −0.21), and with higher sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG; g = 0.24, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.44). No clear pooled effects were observed for waist circumference, body fat percentage, free androgen index, dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate, or anti-Müllerian hormone. Follicle-stimulating hormone and luteinizing hormone estimates lay at the statistical boundary and were heterogeneous; leave-one-study-out inference was also unstable for free testosterone and SHBG. Certainty was low or very low across outcomes. Conclusions: Aerobic or aerobic-oriented exercise showed favorable pooled differences in selected anthropometric and androgen-related markers, but low certainty and the sensitivity of some estimates preclude an endocrine-targeted dose or reproductive-benefit claim.

Related

  1. Polyendocrine metabolic ovarian syndrome (PMOS)/polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS): current and future trends
    Jessica L. Chan, Irene Masini, Margareta Danuta Pisarska
    Journal of Clinical InvestigationPeer-reviewedCC BY17 citedObstetrics, gynaecology & paediatricsOpenAlex
  2. Polyendocrine metabolic ovarian syndrome, the new name for polycystic ovary syndrome: a multistep global consensus process
    Helena Jane Teede, Mahnaz Bahri Khomami, Rachel Morman
    Reproductive EndocrinologyPeer-reviewedCC BY23 citedObstetrics, gynaecology & paediatricsOpenAlex
  3. The Impact of Incretin-Based Therapies on Anthropometric and Metabolic Parameters in Women with Polyendocrine Metabolic Ovarian Syndrome.
    Andrijana Koceva, Andrej Janež, Mojca Jensterle
    Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapyPeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textObstetrics, gynaecology & paediatricsEurope PMCPMC
  4. Triglyceride-Glucose Index and Systemic Inflammatory Markers in Polyendocrine Metabolic Ovarian Syndrome (Polycystic Ovary Syndrome): A Cross-Sectional Study
    Meryem Kececi Oguzhanoglu, Kursat Oguzhanoglu
    MetabolitesPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Obstetrics, gynaecology & paediatricsCrossref
  5. Polyendocrine metabolic ovarian syndrome, the new name for polycystic ovary syndrome: a multistep global consensus process
    Helena Jane Teede, Mahnaz Bahri Khomami, Rachel Morman +73
    The LancetPeer-reviewedCC BYFull text479 citedObstetrics, gynaecology & paediatricsOpenAlex
BibTeX
@article{qiu2026aerobic,
  title = {{Aerobic and Aerobic-Oriented Exercise for Anthropometric, Androgen-Related, and Reproductive Endocrine Outcomes in Polyendocrine Metabolic Ovarian Syndrome (Polycystic Ovary Syndrome): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis}},
  author = {Lanxin Qiu and Yunzhi Emma Huang and Mingnan Zhuang and Juntao Kan and Zhengqi Qiu},
  journal = {Metabolites},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3390/metabo16100745},
  url = {https://www.mdpi.com/2218-1989/16/10/745},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Aerobic and Aerobic-Oriented Exercise for Anthropometric, Androgen-Related, and Reproductive Endocrine Outcomes in Polyendocrine Metabolic Ovarian Syndrome (Polycystic Ovary Syndrome): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
AU  - Lanxin Qiu
AU  - Yunzhi Emma Huang
AU  - Mingnan Zhuang
AU  - Juntao Kan
AU  - Zhengqi Qiu
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/01
JO  - Metabolites
DO  - 10.3390/metabo16100745
UR  - https://www.mdpi.com/2218-1989/16/10/745
AB  - Background: Aerobic exercise is recommended within lifestyle management for polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), but its effects on anthropometric and endocrine outcomes remain inconsistent. Methods: Five databases were searched from inception through July 2026. Controlled trials of structured aerobic or aerobic-oriented exercise lasting at least four weeks were eligible when the comparator did not receive an exercise program expected to improve aerobic fitness. Between-group changes were expressed as Hedges’ g and pooled using random-effects models with cluster-robust small-sample inference. Subgroup, univariable meta-regression, and dose–response analyses were exploratory. Results: Twenty-two reports representing 20 independent trials were included. The pooled standardized estimate marginally favored exercise for body weight (g = −0.09, 95% CI −0.13 to −0.05), although its magnitude was trivial and the 95% prediction interval crossed the null (−0.29 to 0.11). Exercise was associated with lower body mass index (g = −0.20, 95% CI −0.33 to −0.06), waist-to-hip ratio (g = −0.36, 95% CI −0.56 to −0.19), total testosterone (g = −0.43, 95% CI −0.67 to −0.20), and free testosterone (g = −0.60, 95% CI −0.99 to −0.21), and with higher sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG; g = 0.24, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.44). No clear pooled effects were observed for waist circumference, body fat percentage, free androgen index, dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate, or anti-Müllerian hormone. Follicle-stimulating hormone and luteinizing hormone estimates lay at the statistical boundary and were heterogeneous; leave-one-study-out inference was also unstable for free testosterone and SHBG. Certainty was low or very low across outcomes. Conclusions: Aerobic or aerobic-oriented exercise showed favorable pooled differences in selected anthropometric and androgen-related markers, but low certainty and the sensitivity of some estimates preclude an endocrine-targeted dose or reproductive-benefit claim.
SN  - 2218-1989
ER  -