A systematic review of health literacy interventions in health promotion contexts
Abstract
Background: Health literacy is recognised as a critical determinant of health, and policy frameworks increasingly recommend strengthening it across populations and settings. However, evidence on the effectiveness and characteristics of health literacy interventions remains scarce. Thus, this review s to synthesize interventions designed to improve the ability to deal with health information.
Methods: A systematic literature search identified health literacy intervention studies published between January 2010 and April 2025 across eight databases: Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science, PSYNDEX, ERIC, APA PsycArticles, Teacher Reference Center, and Education Source. Eligibility criteria were predefined and registered in PROSPERO. Following intercoder reliability testing, three reviewers independently screened titles, abstracts, and full texts.
Results: 10,086 records were screened, leading to the inclusion of 111 health literacy interventions. Various outcomes were measured, such as specific literacies (digital, sexual, nutrition, and media literacy, etc.), as well as general health literacy. Considerable heterogeneity was identified in both intervention design and evaluation, including a lack of validated measurement tools. Delivery modalities ranged from classical educational instruction and the teach-back approach to participatory formats such as problem-based learning. A considerable number of interventions adapted content to the needs of populations vulnerable to low HL, including older adults, migrants, and people with low socioeconomic status.
Conclusions: Health literacy interventions have been developed for various contexts and use a broad range of delivery modalities. Both targeted approaches for populations at greater risk of low health literacy and universal interventions may contribute to strengthening population health literacy. However, the heterogeneity in outcome measures limits comparability across studies and constrains conclusions regarding effectiveness.
Key messages: • Refinement and implementation of tailored health literacy interventions for high-risk groups, such as older adults, migrants, and disadvantaged populations, may reduce health inequities.
• There is a need for greater standardisation of outcome measures to improve comparability and establish evidence on effectiveness.
Related
- Digital interventions for parental health literacy in child outcomes: a systematic review
- Interventions to Enhance Organisational Health Literacy Responsiveness in Institutional and Community‐Based Settings for Children: A Systematic Scoping Review
- Effectiveness of health literacy interventions using digital communications in the European Union: a systematic review
- Impact of mobile health interventions for mental health literacy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
- Encouraging healthier choices for children in restaurants: A review of interventions and health promotion strategies
BibTeX
@article{fretian2026systematic,
title = {{A systematic review of health literacy interventions in health promotion contexts}},
author = {AM Fretian and M Alyousefy and K Dadaczynski and C Krudewig and M Meyer and O Okan},
journal = {The European Journal of Public Health},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.1411},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.1411},
note = {CC BY-NC 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - A systematic review of health literacy interventions in health promotion contexts
AU - AM Fretian
AU - M Alyousefy
AU - K Dadaczynski
AU - C Krudewig
AU - M Meyer
AU - O Okan
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/01
JO - The European Journal of Public Health
DO - 10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.1411
UR - https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.1411
AB - Background: Health literacy is recognised as a critical determinant of health, and policy frameworks increasingly recommend strengthening it across populations and settings. However, evidence on the effectiveness and characteristics of health literacy interventions remains scarce. Thus, this review s to synthesize interventions designed to improve the ability to deal with health information. Methods: A systematic literature search identified health literacy intervention studies published between January 2010 and April 2025 across eight databases: Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science, PSYNDEX, ERIC, APA PsycArticles, Teacher Reference Center, and Education Source. Eligibility criteria were predefined and registered in PROSPERO. Following intercoder reliability testing, three reviewers independently screened titles, abstracts, and full texts. Results: 10,086 records were screened, leading to the inclusion of 111 health literacy interventions. Various outcomes were measured, such as specific literacies (digital, sexual, nutrition, and media literacy, etc.), as well as general health literacy. Considerable heterogeneity was identified in both intervention design and evaluation, including a lack of validated measurement tools. Delivery modalities ranged from classical educational instruction and the teach-back approach to participatory formats such as problem-based learning. A considerable number of interventions adapted content to the needs of populations vulnerable to low HL, including older adults, migrants, and people with low socioeconomic status. Conclusions: Health literacy interventions have been developed for various contexts and use a broad range of delivery modalities. Both targeted approaches for populations at greater risk of low health literacy and universal interventions may contribute to strengthening population health literacy. However, the heterogeneity in outcome measures limits comparability across studies and constrains conclusions regarding effectiveness. Key messages: • Refinement and implementation of tailored health literacy interventions for high-risk groups, such as older adults, migrants, and disadvantaged populations, may reduce health inequities. • There is a need for greater standardisation of outcome measures to improve comparability and establish evidence on effectiveness.
SN - 1101-1262
SN - 1464-360X
ER -