Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 54 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYNature Communications

Gaps and drivers of global marine animal biodiversity from the surface to abyss

  1. 1Goethe University Frankfurt. Department 15 - Life Sciences, Institute for Ecology, Evolution and Diversity, 60438, Frankfurt am Main, Germany. [email protected]
  2. 2Senckenberg Research Institute and Natural History Museum, Senckenberg Data and Modelling Centre and Department of Marine Zoology, Geobiodiversity Informatics, Senckenberganlage 25, 60325, Frankfurt am Main, Germany. [email protected]

Abstract

With advances in global biodiversity data sharing, particularly following the Census of Marine Life, understanding of marine biodiversity has improved but remains incomplete. The Ocean Biodiversity Information System and Global Biodiversity Information Facility host over 150 million marine occurrence records, enabling reassessment of global biodiversity and data gaps. Here, we compile a quality-controlled dataset of ca. 48 million records covering 184,141 marine animal species, representing ~87% of accepted World Register of Marine Species and 91% of Ocean Biodiversity Information System taxa. Generalised Linear and Additive Models assess how geoecological drivers and human impact influence species richness while accounting for sampling effort and spatial autocorrelation across depth and taxa. Approximately 50% of the global ocean remains insufficiently sampled, with more than 160 million km² below 200 m lacking data. Sampling is biased toward developed regions, especially the North Atlantic, with major gaps in equatorial and Global South regions. Central tropical areas ( - 5° to 5°) contribute only <2.5% of global records, helping explain non-significant bimodal latitudinal patterns. Shallow-water richness is mainly associated with temperature, while deep-sea patterns relate to human impact (sampling intensity) and nitrate-driven remineralisation. These results highlight major global data gaps and the need for depth-explicit, bias-aware biodiversity assessment and monitoring to support conservation and the UN Ocean Decade.

Related

  1. Animal Biodiversity during the Late Pleistocene and Early Holocene in the Zagros Mountains: Evidence from the Wezmeh Cave
    Hossein Davoudi, Marjan Mashkour, Fereidoun Biglari
    Journal of Iran National MuseumPeer-reviewedPublisher termsFull textEcologyEvolutionary biologyHAL
  2. The Marine Isotopic Stage 7: a relic of the “41 ka world”? Perspectives from a global-scale sea-surface temperature synthesis
    Etienne Legrain, Nathan Stevenard, Emilie Capron +2
    Climate of the PastPeer-reviewedCC BYFull text1 citedAtmospheric science & meteorologyHAL
  3. From plankton to fish: 21st-century redistribution of marine biodiversity and the changing role of rare species
    Elena Couce, Lily Greig, Georg H. Engelhard +7
    Science AdvancesPeer-reviewedCC BYClimate scienceCrossref
  4. Separating Faces in ARMS Metabarcoding Improves Marine Biodiversity Monitoring: A Comparison Across Protocols, Experimental Designs and Photographic Surveys
    Anne Chenuil, Elyna Bouchereau, Térence Legrand +20
    Molecular Ecology ResourcesPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full text1 citedEcologyEnvironmental science & pollutionHAL
  5. Linking marine benthic biodiversity and ecosystem functions related to carbon cycling in a continental mud depocenter
    Chueh-Chen Tung, Moritz Holtappels, Alexa Wrede +5
    BiogeosciencesPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textOceanography & cryosphereCrossref
BibTeX
@article{saeedi2026gaps,
  title = {{Gaps and drivers of global marine animal biodiversity from the surface to abyss}},
  author = {Hanieh Saeedi},
  journal = {Nature Communications},
  year = {2026},
  month = may,
  doi = {10.1038/s41467-026-73613-z},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-73613-z},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Gaps and drivers of global marine animal biodiversity from the surface to abyss
AU  - Hanieh Saeedi
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/05/27
JO  - Nature Communications
DO  - 10.1038/s41467-026-73613-z
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-73613-z
AB  - With advances in global biodiversity data sharing, particularly following the Census of Marine Life, understanding of marine biodiversity has improved but remains incomplete. The Ocean Biodiversity Information System and Global Biodiversity Information Facility host over 150 million marine occurrence records, enabling reassessment of global biodiversity and data gaps. Here, we compile a quality-controlled dataset of ca. 48 million records covering 184,141 marine animal species, representing ~87% of accepted World Register of Marine Species and 91% of Ocean Biodiversity Information System taxa. Generalised Linear and Additive Models assess how geoecological drivers and human impact influence species richness while accounting for sampling effort and spatial autocorrelation across depth and taxa. Approximately 50% of the global ocean remains insufficiently sampled, with more than 160 million km² below 200 m lacking data. Sampling is biased toward developed regions, especially the North Atlantic, with major gaps in equatorial and Global South regions. Central tropical areas ( - 5° to 5°) contribute only <2.5% of global records, helping explain non-significant bimodal latitudinal patterns. Shallow-water richness is mainly associated with temperature, while deep-sea patterns relate to human impact (sampling intensity) and nitrate-driven remineralisation. These results highlight major global data gaps and the need for depth-explicit, bias-aware biodiversity assessment and monitoring to support conservation and the UN Ocean Decade.
SN  - 2041-1723
ER  -