Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
189,280 studies31 sourcesUpdated 37 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

Stochastic Optimization Under Power-Law Spectra: Tight Bounds and Shuffling Analysis

Abstract

Recent work has established that power-law spectral conditions on data enable tight convergence bounds for deterministic gradient descent, resolving the conflict between classical exponential bounds and observed power-law learning curves. In this work, we extend this result to the stochastic regime of high-dimensional machine learning. We provide two main contributions: (1) We generalize the power-law spectral theory to Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD), showing that the same spectral exponents govern stochastic dynamics; (2) For the fundamental case of isotropic Gaussian data, we provide a precise analysis of data shuffling, deriving exact constants that prove Single Shuffle is strictly superior to Flip-Flop and IID sampling. Our results bridge the gap between abstract spectral theory and practical stochastic training choices, offering a unified picture of how data geometry drives optimization speed.

Related

  1. How Many Directions Must a Truncated Diffusion Sampler Retain? Matching Bounds Under Power-Law Spectra
    Radmehr Karimian, Ali Mohades, Johannes Lederer
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsarXiv
  2. Revisiting AdaGrad in Stochastic Convex Optimization: Last Iterates, High Probability, and Lower Bounds
    Weiming Ou, Xiao Wang
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textOptimisation & controlarXiv
  3. Tight Lower Bounds for Stochastic Nonconvex-Strongly-Concave Minimax Optimization
    Siqi Zhang, Qilong Wu, Junchi Yang
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textOptimisation & controlarXiv
  4. Near-Optimal Regret Bounds for Monotone Stochastic Optimization under Semi-Bandit Feedback
    Tao Hu, Rohan Ghuge
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textStatisticsarXiv
  5. Lower Bounds for Stochastic First-Order Algorithms with Variance Reduction in Nonconvex--Concave Minimax Optimization
    Jiayi Song, Zi Xu
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textOptimisation & controlStatisticsarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{sa2026stochastic,
  title = {{Stochastic Optimization Under Power-Law Spectra: Tight Bounds and Shuffling Analysis}},
  author = {Christopher De Sa and Thomas Dybdahl Ahle and Yaroslav Bulatov and Christopher Ré},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.36271},
  eprint = {2609.36271},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.36271},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Stochastic Optimization Under Power-Law Spectra: Tight Bounds and Shuffling Analysis
AU  - Christopher De Sa
AU  - Thomas Dybdahl Ahle
AU  - Yaroslav Bulatov
AU  - Christopher Ré
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/17
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.36271
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.36271
AB  - Recent work has established that power-law spectral conditions on data enable tight convergence bounds for deterministic gradient descent, resolving the conflict between classical exponential bounds and observed power-law learning curves. In this work, we extend this result to the stochastic regime of high-dimensional machine learning. We provide two main contributions: (1) We generalize the power-law spectral theory to Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD), showing that the same spectral exponents govern stochastic dynamics; (2) For the fundamental case of isotropic Gaussian data, we provide a precise analysis of data shuffling, deriving exact constants that prove Single Shuffle is strictly superior to Flip-Flop and IID sampling. Our results bridge the gap between abstract spectral theory and practical stochastic training choices, offering a unified picture of how data geometry drives optimization speed.
ER  -