Scope-Restricted Backtracking Counterfactuals

@misc{aguas2026scoperestricted,
  title = {{Scope-Restricted Backtracking Counterfactuals}},
  author = {Johan de Aguas and Martin Jullum},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.08017},
  eprint = {2610.08017},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.08017},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}

TY  - UNPB
TI  - Scope-Restricted Backtracking Counterfactuals
AU  - Johan de Aguas
AU  - Martin Jullum
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/06
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.08017
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.08017
AB  - Interventional counterfactuals evaluate statements such as "had A been a" by replacing the assignment for A while keeping the unit's exogenous background fixed. Backtracking counterfactuals reverse this logic: they preserve the structural assignments and instead vary background conditions across worlds. This semantics is natural for diagnostic explanation, but full backtracking may be too permissive because every exogenous coordinate can vary. We introduce scope-restricted backtracking counterfactuals, in which the modeler specifies which coordinates may vary while the remainder are shared across worlds. The scope determines the admissible carriers of the contrast, while a cross-world kernel governs the plausibility of their alternative values. We present model-based inference for general scope-restricted backtracking counterfactuals, derive sharp marginal bounds for a specified explanatory query, and establish frontier and compatibility conditions under which this explanatory query admits a modified-value policy representation. A linear-Gaussian example distinguishes local-noise, ancestor, irrelevant-noise, and infeasible explanations across scopes, while an application to the UCI Adult benchmark illustrates kernel specification, sensitivity, and how much of the explanation is carried by the cross-world coupling itself.
ER  -