Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
194,164 studies31 sourcesUpdated 1 h ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Frontiers in Public Health

The Relational Cascade Model: a Measurement for Change framework for testing caregiver coaching as upstream mental health promotion

4 affiliations
  1. 1Caribbean Center for Child Neurodevelopment
  2. 2East African Center for Child Neurodevelopment
  3. 3Global Center for Child Neurodevelopment
  4. 4Windward Islands Research & Education Foundation

Abstract

Early childhood development remains chronically underfunded and marginalized in global health policy, often treated as a downstream education concern because no single sector owns it. We propose that the relational environment of early childhood, mediated through caregiver regulation, attunement, and responsiveness, is a proximal pathway through which adversity may be transmitted across generations and therefore interrupted. The Relational Cascade Model (RCM) is an architecture linking trainer, coach, caregiver, and child in a cascade of regulatory capacity in which each level requires the same relational resources it transmits. The RCM draws on developmental cascade theory, attachment and co-regulation, salutogenesis, differential susceptibility, and neurobiological evidence on hippocampal plasticity, and is operationalized through the Conscious Discipline curriculum, which is distinct from the cascade itself. We describe its implementation in two low- and middle-income country contexts, via the Roving Caregiver Programme in Grenada and Community Health Promoter coaching in Kenya, reaching 5,692 children through 2,828 trained parents and 279 community workers as of June 2026. The model is assessed through a Measurement for Change (M4C) framework capturing caregiver wellbeing, intervention fidelity, child neurodevelopment, and attitudes toward corporal punishment. These are captured within one cross-sectoral architecture, making the caregiving relationship visible across health, education, and child-rights accountability streams. We argue that this measurement framework, rather than additional intervention content, supplies the multilevel data needed to test the cascade rather than assume it, and propose it as a template for moving early childhood, and public health broadly, from siloed accountability to systems-level learning.

Related

  1. Unpacking caregiver stigma in health conditions: a systematic review of conceptualisations, measurement tools and health outcomes
    Nele Loecher, Lara Counts, Luke Zabotka +4
    BMJ OpenPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0Full textEpidemiology & public healthCrossrefPMC
  2. Toward Caregiver Flourishing: A Framework for Sustainable Capacity in Dementia Care
    Cameron Beckett
    Journal of health and social behaviorPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull textPsychiatry & mental healthPMC
  3. Rethinking success in public health education and promotion: a narrative ownership framework for sustainable health behavior change
    Tsuyoshi Okuhara, Hiroko Okada, Emi Furukawa
    Frontiers in public healthPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEpidemiology & public healthEurope PMC
  4. Synergistic promotion of white-to-beige adipocyte transition by manganese-nucleic acid framework and allicin for alleviating obesity.
    Teng Wang, Bingxin Huangfu, Shurong He +6
    Journal of nanobiotechnologyPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textPhysiologyEurope PMCPMC
  5. The socioecological framework for health literacy promotion in adult non-formal education: empirical findings and socioecological conceptual framework.
    Aleksandra Bazileva, Svetlana Ušča
    Frontiers in public healthPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEpidemiology & public healthEurope PMCCrossref
BibTeX
@article{landon2026relational,
  title = {{The Relational Cascade Model: a Measurement for Change framework for testing caregiver coaching as upstream mental health promotion}},
  author = {Barbara Landon and Roberta Evans and Lauren Mohammed and Randall Waechter},
  journal = {Frontiers in Public Health},
  year = {2026},
  month = nov,
  doi = {10.3389/fpubh.2026.1943530},
  url = {https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2026.1943530/full},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - The Relational Cascade Model: a Measurement for Change framework for testing caregiver coaching as upstream mental health promotion
AU  - Barbara Landon
AU  - Roberta Evans
AU  - Lauren Mohammed
AU  - Randall Waechter
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/11/04
JO  - Frontiers in Public Health
DO  - 10.3389/fpubh.2026.1943530
UR  - https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2026.1943530/full
AB  - Early childhood development remains chronically underfunded and marginalized in global health policy, often treated as a downstream education concern because no single sector owns it. We propose that the relational environment of early childhood, mediated through caregiver regulation, attunement, and responsiveness, is a proximal pathway through which adversity may be transmitted across generations and therefore interrupted. The Relational Cascade Model (RCM) is an architecture linking trainer, coach, caregiver, and child in a cascade of regulatory capacity in which each level requires the same relational resources it transmits. The RCM draws on developmental cascade theory, attachment and co-regulation, salutogenesis, differential susceptibility, and neurobiological evidence on hippocampal plasticity, and is operationalized through the Conscious Discipline curriculum, which is distinct from the cascade itself. We describe its implementation in two low- and middle-income country contexts, via the Roving Caregiver Programme in Grenada and Community Health Promoter coaching in Kenya, reaching 5,692 children through 2,828 trained parents and 279 community workers as of June 2026. The model is assessed through a Measurement for Change (M4C) framework capturing caregiver wellbeing, intervention fidelity, child neurodevelopment, and attitudes toward corporal punishment. These are captured within one cross-sectoral architecture, making the caregiving relationship visible across health, education, and child-rights accountability streams. We argue that this measurement framework, rather than additional intervention content, supplies the multilevel data needed to test the cascade rather than assume it, and propose it as a template for moving early childhood, and public health broadly, from siloed accountability to systems-level learning.
SN  - 2296-2565
ER  -