Evaluating the introduction module of Mentalization-Based Treatment: a naturalistic pre-post clinical cohort study.
4 affiliations
- 1Department of Trauma and Personality Disorders, GGZ Oost Brabant, Boekel, The Netherlands. [email protected].
- 2Medical and Clinical Psychology, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands. [email protected].
- 3Department of Postgraduate Training Program in Healthcare Psychology, RINO Zuid, Eindhoven, The Netherlands. [email protected].
- 4Department of Trauma and Personality Disorders, GGZ Oost Brabant, Boekel, The Netherlands.
Abstract
Background
Mentalization-Based Treatment Introduction (MBT-I) is a psychoeducational group module preceding long-term Mentalization-Based Treatment (MBT) for patients with borderline personality disorder (BPD). MBT-I aims to increase knowledge of mentalizing and BPD, prepare patients for treatment, clarify diagnosis, and assess mentalizing capacities. However, empirical evidence remains limited. This study examined whether MBT-I was associated with improved mentalizing capacity and attainment of its clinical goals.Methods
A naturalistic, non-randomized one-group pre-post study was conducted in a Dutch mental health care institute. Patients attended ten weekly MBT-I group sessions. Of 60 patients included, 51 were analyzed. Most had a primary BPD diagnosis; others had personality disorders with comparable difficulties in relational functioning, self-image, and mentalizing. Mentalizing capacity was assessed using the Reflective Functioning Questionnaire, Interpersonal Reactivity Index, and Toronto Alexithymia Scale. MBT-I goals were measured using visual analogue scales.Results
A trend was found for the TAS-20 subscale 'Difficulty Identifying Feelings'. No significant differences were found between pre- and posttest on the RFQ, IRI, and the remaining subscales of the TAS-20. Significant differences were found comparing pre- and post-VAS scores with regard to the goals of MBT-I.Conclusion
MBT-I was not associated with statistically significant improvements across the outcome scales on mentalizing, but a promising trend emerged toward improved emotional awareness. The brief module appears to strengthen early prerequisites for mentalizing and offers clear psychoeducational value by increasing patient knowledge, rather than inducing changes in mentalizing. Future controlled studies are needed to clarify its incremental clinical benefit.
Related
- Clinical outcomes following five-day accelerated intermittent theta burst stimulation for treatment-resistant depression in routine clinical practice: A prospective naturalistic cohort study
- Clinical Outcomes and Treatment Characteristics of Seizure Threshold-Titrated Electroconvulsive Therapy in Schizophrenia: A 3.5-Year Retrospective Naturalistic Course-Level Study
- Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for treatment-resistant depression in Singapore: a retrospective, naturalistic study
- Effect of HPV Vaccine Introduction at 9-10 years: A Randomized Clinical Trial
- Optimal Control Approach for Modeling the Introduction of Sterilizing Treatment for Tuberculosis in Low- and Middle-Income Countries
BibTeX
@article{bachrach2026evaluating,
title = {{Evaluating the introduction module of Mentalization-Based Treatment: a naturalistic pre-post clinical cohort study.}},
author = {Nathan Bachrach and Suzanne Brugman and Ruud Berkers and Robin van der Linde},
journal = {Borderline personality disorder and emotion dysregulation},
year = {2026},
month = aug,
doi = {10.1186/s40479-026-00368-w},
url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42958589},
note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Evaluating the introduction module of Mentalization-Based Treatment: a naturalistic pre-post clinical cohort study.
AU - Nathan Bachrach
AU - Suzanne Brugman
AU - Ruud Berkers
AU - Robin van der Linde
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/08/03
JO - Borderline personality disorder and emotion dysregulation
DO - 10.1186/s40479-026-00368-w
UR - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42958589
AB - Background Mentalization-Based Treatment Introduction (MBT-I) is a psychoeducational group module preceding long-term Mentalization-Based Treatment (MBT) for patients with borderline personality disorder (BPD). MBT-I aims to increase knowledge of mentalizing and BPD, prepare patients for treatment, clarify diagnosis, and assess mentalizing capacities. However, empirical evidence remains limited. This study examined whether MBT-I was associated with improved mentalizing capacity and attainment of its clinical goals.Methods A naturalistic, non-randomized one-group pre-post study was conducted in a Dutch mental health care institute. Patients attended ten weekly MBT-I group sessions. Of 60 patients included, 51 were analyzed. Most had a primary BPD diagnosis; others had personality disorders with comparable difficulties in relational functioning, self-image, and mentalizing. Mentalizing capacity was assessed using the Reflective Functioning Questionnaire, Interpersonal Reactivity Index, and Toronto Alexithymia Scale. MBT-I goals were measured using visual analogue scales.Results A trend was found for the TAS-20 subscale 'Difficulty Identifying Feelings'. No significant differences were found between pre- and posttest on the RFQ, IRI, and the remaining subscales of the TAS-20. Significant differences were found comparing pre- and post-VAS scores with regard to the goals of MBT-I.Conclusion MBT-I was not associated with statistically significant improvements across the outcome scales on mentalizing, but a promising trend emerged toward improved emotional awareness. The brief module appears to strengthen early prerequisites for mentalizing and offers clear psychoeducational value by increasing patient knowledge, rather than inducing changes in mentalizing. Future controlled studies are needed to clarify its incremental clinical benefit.
SN - 2051-6673
ER -