Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
189,280 studies31 sourcesUpdated 49 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDBMC infectious diseases

Bayesian hierarchical analysis of gender and socioeconomic inequalities in HIV testing uptake in Ghana.

  1. 1Independent Researcher and Data Consultant, Kumasi, Ghana. [email protected].
  2. 2Upper West Regional Health Directorate, Wa, Ghana.

Abstract

Background

Despite global efforts to reduce HIV/AIDS, sub‑Saharan Africa continues to bear the highest proportion of new infections and HIV‑related morbidity, making HIV testing a critical component of prevention and treatment. Traditional regression analyses have identified gender and socioeconomic inequalities in testing; however, they may be limited by sparse subgroups within hierarchical survey data. This study examines how these inequalities vary across communities in Ghana, providing evidence to guide interventions and policies that promote equitable HIV testing coverage.Method

Data were obtained from the Ghana Demographic and Health Survey, including 22,058 participants. A Bayesian multilevel logistic regression model was used to examine factors associated with HIV testing uptake. Socioeconomic inequalities were assessed using the Erreygers Concentration Index, which was further decomposed to identify key contributors to inequality across wealth groups. Bayesian estimates reported an adjusted Odds Ratio (aOR) and a 95% credible interval, while bivariate analysis used a 5% significance level.Results

Overall, less than 50% of the participants had ever tested for HIV, with testing among men 26.9%(95%CI:25.3,28.6) and women 57.4% (95%CI: 55.9,58.7). The likelihood of HIV testing uptake among men was significantly 83% less (aOR = 0.17; 95% CrI: 0.14, 0.19) compared with women. The findings revealed that men aged 25-29 years had higher odds of HIV testing compared with those aged 15-19 years (aOR = 22.74; 95% CrI: 5.30, 54.32). Similarly, women in the same age group also had higher odds of HIV testing (aOR = 11.01; 95% CrI: 6.82, 18.60). HIV testing uptake showed pro-rich inequality in the study population, with higher inequality among men compared to women. Men contribution reduced overall socioeconomic inequality by 39.7% in HIV testing uptake.Conclusion

HIV testing uptake among Ghanaians remain low, particularly among men. Gender, age, education, residence, and socioeconomic status were factors associated with testing uptake. Moreover, HIV testing was disproportionately concentrated among wealthier populations. These findings suggest the need for equity-focused HIV testing strategies that address both individual and structural barriers, targeting men, rural populations, and socioeconomically disadvantaged groups.

Related

  1. Environmental heavy metal exposure, socioeconomic inequalities, and childhood anaemia in Bangladesh: a nationally representative, survey-weighted Bayesian hierarchical analysis
    M. F. Al Fidah, M. R. Islam, A. K. Roy +3
    medRxivPreprintCC BYFull textEpidemiology & public healthmedRxiv
  2. Whose Diet Suffers When Social Ties Change? Inter-Related Socioeconomic and Gender Inequalities in the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging Cohort
    Sanaz Mehranfar, Heather Keller, Rachel A. Murphy +4
    NutrientsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textNutritionCrossrefEurope PMC
  3. Recommendations & Caveats for Recruiting Stratified Samples Across Race/Ethnicity, Gender, and Socioeconomic Status Using the Prolific Online Platform
    Julia Machina, Kimberly Muellers, Xiqiao Chen +1
    PsyArXivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textPsychiatry & mental healthOSF
  4. Socioeconomic inequalities in biological age: multidimensional gradients and cross-national heterogeneity in SHARE
    H. Guo
    medRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textEpidemiology & public healthmedRxiv
  5. Digital participation and socioeconomic inequalities in later-life health: a cross-national analysis of six harmonized aging cohorts
    Linwei Liu, Qiu Zhang
    BMC Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Epidemiology & public healthCrossref
BibTeX
@article{ngmenbelle2026bayesian,
  title = {{Bayesian hierarchical analysis of gender and socioeconomic inequalities in HIV testing uptake in Ghana.}},
  author = {David Ngmenbelle and Stephen Nimirkpen},
  journal = {BMC infectious diseases},
  year = {2026},
  month = jul,
  doi = {10.1186/s12879-026-14085-w},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42919232},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Bayesian hierarchical analysis of gender and socioeconomic inequalities in HIV testing uptake in Ghana.
AU  - David Ngmenbelle
AU  - Stephen Nimirkpen
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/07/01
JO  - BMC infectious diseases
DO  - 10.1186/s12879-026-14085-w
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42919232
AB  - Background  Despite global efforts to reduce HIV/AIDS, sub‑Saharan Africa continues to bear the highest proportion of new infections and HIV‑related morbidity, making HIV testing a critical component of prevention and treatment. Traditional regression analyses have identified gender and socioeconomic inequalities in testing; however, they may be limited by sparse subgroups within hierarchical survey data. This study examines how these inequalities vary across communities in Ghana, providing evidence to guide interventions and policies that promote equitable HIV testing coverage.Method  Data were obtained from the Ghana Demographic and Health Survey, including 22,058 participants. A Bayesian multilevel logistic regression model was used to examine factors associated with HIV testing uptake. Socioeconomic inequalities were assessed using the Erreygers Concentration Index, which was further decomposed to identify key contributors to inequality across wealth groups. Bayesian estimates reported an adjusted Odds Ratio (aOR) and a 95% credible interval, while bivariate analysis used a 5% significance level.Results  Overall, less than 50% of the participants had ever tested for HIV, with testing among men 26.9%(95%CI:25.3,28.6) and women 57.4% (95%CI: 55.9,58.7). The likelihood of HIV testing uptake among men was significantly 83% less (aOR = 0.17; 95% CrI: 0.14, 0.19) compared with women. The findings revealed that men aged 25-29 years had higher odds of HIV testing compared with those aged 15-19 years (aOR = 22.74; 95% CrI: 5.30, 54.32). Similarly, women in the same age group also had higher odds of HIV testing (aOR = 11.01; 95% CrI: 6.82, 18.60). HIV testing uptake showed pro-rich inequality in the study population, with higher inequality among men compared to women. Men contribution reduced overall socioeconomic inequality by 39.7% in HIV testing uptake.Conclusion  HIV testing uptake among Ghanaians remain low, particularly among men. Gender, age, education, residence, and socioeconomic status were factors associated with testing uptake. Moreover, HIV testing was disproportionately concentrated among wealthier populations. These findings suggest the need for equity-focused HIV testing strategies that address both individual and structural barriers, targeting men, rural populations, and socioeconomically disadvantaged groups.
SN  - 1471-2334
ER  -