Machine learning-assisted chemometric analysis of salivary ATR-FTIR spectra for the diagnosis of oral submucous fibrosis
4 affiliations
- 1Vananchal Dental College and Hospital
- 2Birla Institute of Technology
- 3Rajendra Institute of Medical Sciences
- 4Banaras Hindu University
Abstract
Background: Oral submucous fibrosis (OSMF) is a chronic, potentially malignant disorder strongly linked to areca nut chewing. Clinical diagnosis is challenging, and histopathology, though the gold standard, is invasive and subject to inter-observer variability. Saliva analysis using Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy offers a promising non-invasive alternative. This study evaluated salivary ATR-FTIR spectral analysis integrated with machine learning for classification of OSMF, individuals with adverse oral habits, and healthy controls.
Methodology: Unstimulated saliva samples were collected from 450 participants comprising 150 patients with clinically diagnosed OSMF, 150 individuals with adverse oral habits without clinical evidence of OSMF, and 150 healthy controls. After centrifugation, the saliva supernatant was analyzed by ATR-FTIR spectroscopy over 400–4000 cm ⁻ ¹. Spectra underwent baseline correction and normalization followed by Savitzky–Golay smoothing. For machine-learning analysis, Standard Scaler and PCA were incorporated within the classification pipeline. Decision Tree, Random Forest, support vector machine (SVM), and XGBoost classifiers were evaluated using stratified 10-fold cross-validation. Hyperparameter optimization and performance estimation used the same cross-validation framework. An independent cohort of 90 participants was used for validation.
Results: XGBoost showed the highest cross-validation performance, with accuracies of 90.62% for Normal versus Habit, 97.67% for Normal versus OSMF, and 91.30% for three-class classification. Statistical analysis identified 157 nominally significant wavenumbers (p<0.05) within a continuous region from 1581 to 2142 cm ⁻ ¹ corresponding to protein and collagen bands. Principal component analysis showed that PC1 and PC2 explained 89.26% and 6.95% of the total variance, respectively (96.21% cumulatively). In the independent validation cohort, accuracy was 80.0% for OSMF versus Normal and 71.7% for Habit versus Normal.
Conclusion: Salivary ATR-FTIR combined with machine learning demonstrated promising classification performance and preliminary performance in an independent cohort. The identified spectral region is biologically plausible in the context of altered salivary biochemical composition associated with inflammation and fibrosis, but it should not be regarded as a validated disease-specific biomarker. Salivary ATR-FTIR is best considered a complementary, non-invasive screening and risk-stratification approach rather than a replacement for clinical/oral examination or histopathological assessment when biopsy is indicated. Larger, diverse, multicenter studies with rigorous validation are needed before clinical implementation.
Related
- Early diagnosis and molecular classification of gastric cancer peritoneal metastasis by deep learning-driven single-cell lipidomics
- Early vs late fusion of qMIDS with machine learning based classifiers for oral cancer diagnosis from gene expression data
- Machine learning–assisted directed evolution of plant Rubisco
- DNA Fragment Length Analysis Using Machine Learning Assisted Vibrational Spectroscopy.
- Breath molecular feature profiling with machine learning for noninvasive diagnosis of gout: a single-center case-control study
BibTeX
@article{shree2026machine,
title = {{Machine learning-assisted chemometric analysis of salivary ATR-FTIR spectra for the diagnosis of oral submucous fibrosis}},
author = {Priya Shree and Yogender Aggarwal and Manish Kumar and Priyank Saxena and Narendra Nath Singh and Akhilesh Chandra and Prerna Srivastava and Somili Nag and Arpita Rai},
journal = {Frontiers in Oncology},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.3389/fonc.2026.1927981},
url = {https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2026.1927981/full},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Machine learning-assisted chemometric analysis of salivary ATR-FTIR spectra for the diagnosis of oral submucous fibrosis
AU - Priya Shree
AU - Yogender Aggarwal
AU - Manish Kumar
AU - Priyank Saxena
AU - Narendra Nath Singh
AU - Akhilesh Chandra
AU - Prerna Srivastava
AU - Somili Nag
AU - Arpita Rai
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/19
JO - Frontiers in Oncology
DO - 10.3389/fonc.2026.1927981
UR - https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2026.1927981/full
AB - Background: Oral submucous fibrosis (OSMF) is a chronic, potentially malignant disorder strongly linked to areca nut chewing. Clinical diagnosis is challenging, and histopathology, though the gold standard, is invasive and subject to inter-observer variability. Saliva analysis using Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy offers a promising non-invasive alternative. This study evaluated salivary ATR-FTIR spectral analysis integrated with machine learning for classification of OSMF, individuals with adverse oral habits, and healthy controls. Methodology: Unstimulated saliva samples were collected from 450 participants comprising 150 patients with clinically diagnosed OSMF, 150 individuals with adverse oral habits without clinical evidence of OSMF, and 150 healthy controls. After centrifugation, the saliva supernatant was analyzed by ATR-FTIR spectroscopy over 400–4000 cm ⁻ ¹. Spectra underwent baseline correction and normalization followed by Savitzky–Golay smoothing. For machine-learning analysis, Standard Scaler and PCA were incorporated within the classification pipeline. Decision Tree, Random Forest, support vector machine (SVM), and XGBoost classifiers were evaluated using stratified 10-fold cross-validation. Hyperparameter optimization and performance estimation used the same cross-validation framework. An independent cohort of 90 participants was used for validation. Results: XGBoost showed the highest cross-validation performance, with accuracies of 90.62% for Normal versus Habit, 97.67% for Normal versus OSMF, and 91.30% for three-class classification. Statistical analysis identified 157 nominally significant wavenumbers (p<0.05) within a continuous region from 1581 to 2142 cm ⁻ ¹ corresponding to protein and collagen bands. Principal component analysis showed that PC1 and PC2 explained 89.26% and 6.95% of the total variance, respectively (96.21% cumulatively). In the independent validation cohort, accuracy was 80.0% for OSMF versus Normal and 71.7% for Habit versus Normal. Conclusion: Salivary ATR-FTIR combined with machine learning demonstrated promising classification performance and preliminary performance in an independent cohort. The identified spectral region is biologically plausible in the context of altered salivary biochemical composition associated with inflammation and fibrosis, but it should not be regarded as a validated disease-specific biomarker. Salivary ATR-FTIR is best considered a complementary, non-invasive screening and risk-stratification approach rather than a replacement for clinical/oral examination or histopathological assessment when biopsy is indicated. Larger, diverse, multicenter studies with rigorous validation are needed before clinical implementation.
SN - 2234-943X
ER -