Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
194,067 studies31 sourcesUpdated 24 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYJournal of Nematology

Where next for the discipline of nematology? Trends and implications for workforce sustainability, disease diagnostics, and biosecurity

  • Kantor Camelia1
  • Eisenback Jonathan D.2
  • Zasada Inga3
  • Kantor Mihail4
4 affiliations
  1. 1Huck Institutes of the Life Sciences, Pennsylvania State University, University Park,PA, 16802, United States
  2. 2School of Plant and Environmental Science, Virginia Tech, State College, Blacksburg, VA, United States
  3. 3NemaSolutions LLC, 1110 NW 33rd St., Corvallis, OR, 97330, United States
  4. 4Department of Plant Pathology and Environmental Microbiology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, 16802, United States
Read full textPDFDOICite

Abstract

Nematodes are among the most abundant and functionally important organisms on Earth, strongly influencing soil processes, agricultural productivity, and biosecurity systems. Despite nematodes’ increasingly important role in agricultural resilience and national biosecurity, the discipline has experienced sustained institutional decline across North America. This work examines the historical development, peak, and contraction of nematology as a scientific discipline in the United States, with comparative insights from Canada. Drawing on historical records, professional society membership data, faculty demographics, diagnostic infrastructure, and bibliometric analyses, we demonstrate that current nematology capacity is increasingly fragile, geographically concentrated, and insufficient to meet emerging risks. The findings reveal a paradox: while nematode-driven threats to crops, forests, and ecosystems are intensifying due to global trade and environmental change, workforce pipelines, diagnostic capacity, and institutional support continue to erode. Bibliometric trends further suggest that the field’s future visibility depends on cross-disciplinary integration with molecular biology, ecology, and food security research. We argue that nematology constitutes critical scientific infrastructure and that its decline reflects structural disinvestment rather than diminished relevance. Strategic reinvestment in nematology training, diagnostics, and faculty positions is essential in an increasingly high-risk global environment.

Related

  1. Bacterial competence and genetic diversity: Implications for the design of diagnostics and vaccines.
    Wondimagegn Wolde Eba
    Biochemistry and biophysics reportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textGenetics & genomicsEurope PMC
  2. Vulnerable microbial communities in Atacama–Altiplano wetlands: modern analogs of ancient ecosystems with implications for sustainability and conservation
    Purificación López-García, David Moreira, Ana Gutiérrez-Preciado +8
    FEMS MicrobesPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0Full textGeneral biologyEnvironmental science & pollutionHAL
  3. As invasions slow down, biosecurity must move inward
    Phillip Joschka Haubrock, Ronaldo Sousa, Antonin Kouba +1
    EcoEvoRxivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textEcologyEvolutionary biologyEcoEvoRxiv
  4. Bypassing Current Biosecurity Screens with AI Designed Proteins and Closing the Gap with Edge-AI Functional Screening
    G. Oualline, M. Noon
    bioRxivPreprintCC BY-NCFull textBioinformatics & computational biologybioRxiv
  5. Implementation of African Swine Fever Biosecurity and Post-Outbreak Recovery in Vietnam, Malaysia, and the Philippines.
    Keyi Duan, Ting Lin, Zengyong Zhu +3
    Veterinary sciencesPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textPlant biologyEurope PMC

Cite

BibTeXRIS
BibTeX
@article{camelia2026where,
  title = {{Where next for the discipline of nematology? Trends and implications for workforce sustainability, disease diagnostics, and biosecurity}},
  author = {Kantor Camelia and Eisenback Jonathan D. and Zasada Inga and Kantor Mihail},
  journal = {Journal of Nematology},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.2478/jofnem-2026-0035},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.2478/jofnem-2026-0035},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Where next for the discipline of nematology? Trends and implications for workforce sustainability, disease diagnostics, and biosecurity
AU  - Kantor Camelia
AU  - Eisenback Jonathan D.
AU  - Zasada Inga
AU  - Kantor Mihail
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/26
JO  - Journal of Nematology
DO  - 10.2478/jofnem-2026-0035
UR  - https://doi.org/10.2478/jofnem-2026-0035
AB  - Nematodes are among the most abundant and functionally important organisms on Earth, strongly influencing soil processes, agricultural productivity, and biosecurity systems. Despite nematodes’ increasingly important role in agricultural resilience and national biosecurity, the discipline has experienced sustained institutional decline across North America. This work examines the historical development, peak, and contraction of nematology as a scientific discipline in the United States, with comparative insights from Canada. Drawing on historical records, professional society membership data, faculty demographics, diagnostic infrastructure, and bibliometric analyses, we demonstrate that current nematology capacity is increasingly fragile, geographically concentrated, and insufficient to meet emerging risks. The findings reveal a paradox: while nematode-driven threats to crops, forests, and ecosystems are intensifying due to global trade and environmental change, workforce pipelines, diagnostic capacity, and institutional support continue to erode. Bibliometric trends further suggest that the field’s future visibility depends on cross-disciplinary integration with molecular biology, ecology, and food security research. We argue that nematology constitutes critical scientific infrastructure and that its decline reflects structural disinvestment rather than diminished relevance. Strategic reinvestment in nematology training, diagnostics, and faculty positions is essential in an increasingly high-risk global environment.
SN  - 2640-396X
SN  - 0022-300X
ER  -