CA1 reinstatement and novelty response independently support recognition memory
- 1Fudan University
Abstract
One of the central tensions in memory research is whether consistency or differentiation across events is beneficial for remembering. While theoretical models posit that the hippocampal subfield CA1 subserves both types of computations, it remains unclear how it can simultaneously express both in service of recognition memory. Here, we contrasted the two prominent functions of CA1: reinstatement (consistency) and novelty processing (differentiation) to address this gap. To this end, we analysed the Natural Scenes Dataset featuring eight participants who completed a continuous recognition memory task spanning 41 separate days with 213,000 trials in total. We calculated reinstatement and novelty indices for each image and then examined the degree to which these reflected successful memory encoding. We found that CA1 showed evidence for encoding-related reinstatement as well as for novelty processing even after controlling for each other. Reinstatement was specific to retrieving the initial representation during the first retrieval attempt and did not extend to other forms of reinstatement. Exploratory analyses additionally identified reinstatement in CA3, which exhibited different response profiles compared to CA1. Our work thus highlights that computations of consistency as well as differentiation can be orthogonal signals contributing independently to memory success and can simultaneously co-exist within the same region of the hippocampus.
Related
- Hippocampal subfields support human novelty detection via distinct signals
- Artificial Reactivation of a Cocaine-Associated Ensembles in the Dorsal Dentate Gyrus Attenuates Cocaine Prime-Induced Reinstatement of Drug-Seeking
- Chronic semaglutide treatment attenuates cue-induced reinstatement of cocaine-seeking and cocaine-induced stereotypy in male and female rats
- Cortical reinstatement of causally related events sparks narrative insights by updating neural representation patterns
- Stress-response regulators tune enterobacterial common antigen synthesis to support acid and reactive nitrogen species stress resistance
BibTeX
@misc{quent2026reinstatement,
title = {{CA1 reinstatement and novelty response independently support recognition memory}},
author = {J. A. Quent and M. Zhang and D. Vatansever},
howpublished = {bioRxiv},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.64898/2026.09.14.751602},
url = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.14.751602v1},
note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - CA1 reinstatement and novelty response independently support recognition memory
AU - J. A. Quent
AU - M. Zhang
AU - D. Vatansever
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/14
PB - bioRxiv
DO - 10.64898/2026.09.14.751602
UR - https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.14.751602v1
AB - One of the central tensions in memory research is whether consistency or differentiation across events is beneficial for remembering. While theoretical models posit that the hippocampal subfield CA1 subserves both types of computations, it remains unclear how it can simultaneously express both in service of recognition memory. Here, we contrasted the two prominent functions of CA1: reinstatement (consistency) and novelty processing (differentiation) to address this gap. To this end, we analysed the Natural Scenes Dataset featuring eight participants who completed a continuous recognition memory task spanning 41 separate days with 213,000 trials in total. We calculated reinstatement and novelty indices for each image and then examined the degree to which these reflected successful memory encoding. We found that CA1 showed evidence for encoding-related reinstatement as well as for novelty processing even after controlling for each other. Reinstatement was specific to retrieving the initial representation during the first retrieval attempt and did not extend to other forms of reinstatement. Exploratory analyses additionally identified reinstatement in CA3, which exhibited different response profiles compared to CA1. Our work thus highlights that computations of consistency as well as differentiation can be orthogonal signals contributing independently to memory success and can simultaneously co-exist within the same region of the hippocampus.
ER -