Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
189,280 studies31 sourcesUpdated 8 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYJournal of Medical Radiation Sciences

Dosimetric Outcomes of Definitive Radiation Therapy to Anal Squamous Cell Carcinoma in a Single Institution Using Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy Evaluated Against Australian and International Treatment Planning Guidelines

  1. 1Department of Radiation Oncology, Mid North Coast Cancer Institute, Coffs Harbour Health Campus, Coffs Harbour, New South Wales, Australia.
  2. 2RCS Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Coffs Harbour, New South Wales, Australia.

Abstract

Introduction

Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) is the technique of choice for anal Squamous Cell Carcinoma (SCC), offering highly conformal dosimetry while improving dose sparing to Organs at Risk (OARs). Achieving the dose constraints listed in national and international guidelines can be challenging. This report validates the achievability of these constraints and brings a clinical context to these guidelines.Methods

A retrospective analysis of 43 clinician approved plans was conducted. These plans were evaluated against the Radiation Therapy Oncology Workgroup (RTOG) 0529, eviQ, the Assessment of New Radiation Oncology Treatments and Technologies (ANROTAT) and departmental protocol. A constraint was considered 'pass' if it met an ideal objective or minor violation. A constraint was considered 'failed' if a major violation occurred.Results

RTOG 0529 Planning Target Volumes (PTV) constraints D98 ≥ 80% and D95 ≥ 90% of the Total Dose (TD) were achieved in 100% of our patient cohort, with a median of 93.8% and 96% TD for the high-risk PTV (54Gy) and 92.6% and 95.2% TD for the low-risk PTV (45Gy). The stricter ANROTAT D98 ≥ 90% TD was achieved in 93% of our patient cohort for the high-risk PTV (54Gy) and 77% for the low-risk PTV (45Gy). Major violations of the gastrointestinal (GI) OAR constraints were observed in up to 40% of the plans. While there were no strict major violation specifications for skeletal and genitourinary (GU) OARs, dose constraint non-compliance occurred in up to 19% and 56% of the plans respectively.Conclusions

Although VMAT is the gold standard for anal SCC, achieving the recommended dose constraints was challenging. Further refinement of dose constraints is essential to ensure the clinical achievability of planning objectives.

Related

  1. Fictive Field-based Feathering for Extended-SSD Total Body Irradiation: A Single-institution Planning and Dosimetric Analysis
    Vijay Kumar Mogulagani, Mohan Raj Uthiran, Ben Johnson Varghese +3
    Journal of Medical PhysicsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-SAFull textApplied physics & instrumentationDOAJ
  2. Comparative Dosimetric Evaluation of Tomotherapy with a 1-cm Field Width versus Volumetric-modulated Arc Therapy for Whole-brain Radiotherapy with Hippocampal Avoidance
    Sankar Sekar, R. Leel Malar, Dinesh Babu A +4
    Journal of Medical PhysicsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-SAFull textApplied physics & instrumentationDOAJ
  3. Deep Learning-based Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy Dose Prediction with Uncertainty Quantification for Left- and Right-sided Breast Cancer: A Single-institution Feasibility Study
    Thanakorn Sukha, Chanon Puttanawarut, Nat Sirirutbunkajorn +3
    Journal of Medical PhysicsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-SAFull textApplied physics & instrumentationDOAJ
  4. Dosimetric Comparison of One-, Two-, Three-, and Four-Arc Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy Plans in Cervical Carcinoma: Evaluation of Plan Quality, Organ-at-Risk Sparing, and Treatment Efficiency.
    Priyadharshini G, Himanshi Khattar, Piyush Kumar
    CureusPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textApplied physics & instrumentationEurope PMC
  5. Dosimetric and Treatment Delivery Efficiency Comparison of Two Ring-gantry Linear Accelerator Platforms for Liver Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy
    Srikanth Guduru, Rohith Singareddy, N. V. N. Madhusudhana Sresty +2
    Journal of Medical PhysicsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-SAFull textApplied physics & instrumentationDOAJ
BibTeX
@article{alshamrani2026dosimetric,
  title = {{Dosimetric Outcomes of Definitive Radiation Therapy to Anal Squamous Cell Carcinoma in a Single Institution Using Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy Evaluated Against Australian and International Treatment Planning Guidelines}},
  author = {Faisal Alshamrani and Michael Hsieh and Anthony Karl and Lauren Chamberlain and Stuart Greenham and Josie Goodworth and Maree Wood and Thomas Shakespeare and Tue Le and Abdul Mohd Tahir},
  journal = {Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1002/jmrs.70124},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/PMC13717669},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Dosimetric Outcomes of Definitive Radiation Therapy to Anal Squamous Cell Carcinoma in a Single Institution Using Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy Evaluated Against Australian and International Treatment Planning Guidelines
AU  - Faisal Alshamrani
AU  - Michael Hsieh
AU  - Anthony Karl
AU  - Lauren Chamberlain
AU  - Stuart Greenham
AU  - Josie Goodworth
AU  - Maree Wood
AU  - Thomas Shakespeare
AU  - Tue Le
AU  - Abdul Mohd Tahir
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/29
JO  - Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences
DO  - 10.1002/jmrs.70124
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/PMC13717669
AB  - Introduction  Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) is the technique of choice for anal Squamous Cell Carcinoma (SCC), offering highly conformal dosimetry while improving dose sparing to Organs at Risk (OARs). Achieving the dose constraints listed in national and international guidelines can be challenging. This report validates the achievability of these constraints and brings a clinical context to these guidelines.Methods  A retrospective analysis of 43 clinician approved plans was conducted. These plans were evaluated against the Radiation Therapy Oncology Workgroup (RTOG) 0529, eviQ, the Assessment of New Radiation Oncology Treatments and Technologies (ANROTAT) and departmental protocol. A constraint was considered 'pass' if it met an ideal objective or minor violation. A constraint was considered 'failed' if a major violation occurred.Results  RTOG 0529 Planning Target Volumes (PTV) constraints D98 ≥ 80% and D95 ≥ 90% of the Total Dose (TD) were achieved in 100% of our patient cohort, with a median of 93.8% and 96% TD for the high-risk PTV (54Gy) and 92.6% and 95.2% TD for the low-risk PTV (45Gy). The stricter ANROTAT D98 ≥ 90% TD was achieved in 93% of our patient cohort for the high-risk PTV (54Gy) and 77% for the low-risk PTV (45Gy). Major violations of the gastrointestinal (GI) OAR constraints were observed in up to 40% of the plans. While there were no strict major violation specifications for skeletal and genitourinary (GU) OARs, dose constraint non-compliance occurred in up to 19% and 56% of the plans respectively.Conclusions  Although VMAT is the gold standard for anal SCC, achieving the recommended dose constraints was challenging. Further refinement of dose constraints is essential to ensure the clinical achievability of planning objectives.
SN  - 2051-3895
SN  - 2051-3909
ER  -