Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
190,839 studies31 sourcesUpdated 8 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC-SAJournal of Medical Physics

Fictive Field-based Feathering for Extended-SSD Total Body Irradiation: A Single-institution Planning and Dosimetric Analysis

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to describe the planning, dosimetric evaluation, quality assurance (QA), and clinical implementation of a feathered junction technique for low-dose total body irradiation (TBI) using a common coordinate system and fictive field approach with an extended source-to-skin distance (SSD) anteroposterior/posteroanterior (AP/PA) couch-based linear accelerator technique. Materials and Methods: Six patients treated with low-dose TBI for hematopoietic stem cell transplant conditioning were included. Two patients had aplastic anemia (2 Gy/1 fraction), two had myelodysplastic syndrome (4 Gy/2 fractions), and two had leukemia (2 Gy/1 fraction). Computed tomography (CT) simulation was performed in head-first supine and feet-first supine positions using a full-body Vac-Lok system, with a pelvic fiducial marker defining a common coordinate origin. Treatment planning was performed in the Monaco treatment planning system for an Elekta Synergy linear accelerator (6 MV, MLCi2). An extended-SSD AP/PA technique with jaw-based feathered junctions was used. Dosimetric evaluation included target coverage, junction dose characteristics, and organ-at-risk doses. QA included ionization chamber measurements and cone-beam CT verification. Results: Adequate target coverage was achieved. The mean planning target volume D95% and V95% were 92.9% ±2.05% and 94.03% ±1.47%, respectively. The mean maximum dose was 115.51% ±0.32%, mainly in peripheral regions. The mean lung doses were 103% ±1.2% and 104% ±0.8%, and kidney doses were 102% ±0.96% and 101.5% ±1.35%. Junction doses ranged from 102.5% ±0.5% to 105.5% ±0.6%. Conclusion: The technique achieved acceptable dose homogeneity and controlled junction doses. It provides a reproducible and feasible approach for low-dose TBI using standard linear accelerator infrastructure without organ shielding.

Related

  1. Dosimetric Outcomes of Definitive Radiation Therapy to Anal Squamous Cell Carcinoma in a Single Institution Using Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy Evaluated Against Australian and International Treatment Planning Guidelines
    Faisal Alshamrani, Michael Hsieh, Anthony Karl +7
    Journal of Medical Radiation SciencesPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textApplied physics & instrumentationEurope PMCEurope PMCPMC
  2. In Silico Dosimetric Comparison of Intensity-Modulated Photon Versus Proton Therapy for Pelvic and Para-Aortic Nodal Recurrence of Prostate Cancer Following Prior Irradiation
    James A. Knight, Hao Chen, Anh Tran +9
    CancersPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Applied physics & instrumentationCrossref
  3. Dosimetric Impact of Simultaneous and Separate Planning with Fixed/Iris Collimators on Brain Doses in Multiple Brain Metastases
    Hatice Tataroglu, Ela Delikgöz Soykut, Mustafa Özer +1
    Journal of Medical PhysicsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-SAFull textApplied physics & instrumentationDOAJ
  4. Dosimetric and Treatment Delivery Efficiency Comparison of Two Ring-gantry Linear Accelerator Platforms for Liver Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy
    Srikanth Guduru, Rohith Singareddy, N. V. N. Madhusudhana Sresty +2
    Journal of Medical PhysicsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-SAFull textApplied physics & instrumentationDOAJ
  5. Dosimetric Comparison of Functional Radiosurgery Treatments for Trigeminal Neuralgia, Essential Tremor, and Obsessive-compulsive Disorder Using Gamma Knife, CyberKnife, and Linear Accelerators
    Carlos Daniel Venencia, Crystian Wilian Chagas Saraiva, Gabriela Reis dos Santos de Jesus
    Journal of Medical PhysicsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-SAFull textApplied physics & instrumentationDOAJ
BibTeX
@article{mogulagani2026fictive,
  title = {{Fictive Field-based Feathering for Extended-SSD Total Body Irradiation: A Single-institution Planning and Dosimetric Analysis}},
  author = {Vijay Kumar Mogulagani and Mohan Raj Uthiran and Ben Johnson Varghese and Siva Kumar Radhakrishnan and Lakshmana Perumal and Madhuri Dumpala},
  journal = {Journal of Medical Physics},
  year = {2026},
  month = jul,
  doi = {10.4103/jmp.jmp_87_26},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.4103/jmp.jmp_87_26},
  note = {CC BY-NC-SA},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Fictive Field-based Feathering for Extended-SSD Total Body Irradiation: A Single-institution Planning and Dosimetric Analysis
AU  - Vijay Kumar Mogulagani
AU  - Mohan Raj Uthiran
AU  - Ben Johnson Varghese
AU  - Siva Kumar Radhakrishnan
AU  - Lakshmana Perumal
AU  - Madhuri Dumpala
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/07/01
JO  - Journal of Medical Physics
DO  - 10.4103/jmp.jmp_87_26
UR  - https://doi.org/10.4103/jmp.jmp_87_26
AB  - Purpose: The purpose of this study was to describe the planning, dosimetric evaluation, quality assurance (QA), and clinical implementation of a feathered junction technique for low-dose total body irradiation (TBI) using a common coordinate system and fictive field approach with an extended source-to-skin distance (SSD) anteroposterior/posteroanterior (AP/PA) couch-based linear accelerator technique. Materials and Methods: Six patients treated with low-dose TBI for hematopoietic stem cell transplant conditioning were included. Two patients had aplastic anemia (2 Gy/1 fraction), two had myelodysplastic syndrome (4 Gy/2 fractions), and two had leukemia (2 Gy/1 fraction). Computed tomography (CT) simulation was performed in head-first supine and feet-first supine positions using a full-body Vac-Lok system, with a pelvic fiducial marker defining a common coordinate origin. Treatment planning was performed in the Monaco treatment planning system for an Elekta Synergy linear accelerator (6 MV, MLCi2). An extended-SSD AP/PA technique with jaw-based feathered junctions was used. Dosimetric evaluation included target coverage, junction dose characteristics, and organ-at-risk doses. QA included ionization chamber measurements and cone-beam CT verification. Results: Adequate target coverage was achieved. The mean planning target volume D95% and V95% were 92.9% ±2.05% and 94.03% ±1.47%, respectively. The mean maximum dose was 115.51% ±0.32%, mainly in peripheral regions. The mean lung doses were 103% ±1.2% and 104% ±0.8%, and kidney doses were 102% ±0.96% and 101.5% ±1.35%. Junction doses ranged from 102.5% ±0.5% to 105.5% ±0.6%. Conclusion: The technique achieved acceptable dose homogeneity and controlled junction doses. It provides a reproducible and feasible approach for low-dose TBI using standard linear accelerator infrastructure without organ shielding.
SN  - 0971-6203
SN  - 1998-3913
ER  -