Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 38 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0PLOS Global Public Health

Religious beliefs and practices, political orientation, and distrust in healthcare predict attitudes toward mRNA vaccines in the United States

  1. 1Division of General Medicine & Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, United States of America
  2. 2Rosemead School of Psychology, Biola University, La Mirada, California, United States of America

Abstract

Religion has contributed to societal divides regarding COVID-19 mRNA vaccines. In this study, we conducted a secondary analysis of a survey of U.S. adults (N = 4939) focused on how religious affiliations, beliefs, and practices impact attitudes toward genetic and genomic activities, one of which was mRNA vaccines. The dataset included large samples of participants from six religious groups in the U.S. (Black Protestant, Catholic, Evangelical Protestant, Jewish, Mainline Protestant, and Muslim), as well as individuals who were atheist, agnostic, or spiritual. ANCOVA results indicated that Evangelical Protestant participants showed significantly less support for mRNA vaccines than other groups, while atheist participants were the most supportive. Muslim participants had the highest concerns, whereas atheist participants had the lowest. Regression analyses indicated the strongest predictors of support for mRNA vaccines were more spiritual community support for community health, followed by higher acceptance of evolution, more liberal political orientation, less distrust toward the healthcare system, higher frequency of attending religious activities, higher income, lower fundamentalist religious beliefs, and more spiritual community support for liberal reproductive and end of life views. The strongest predictors of concerns about mRNA vaccines were more distrust toward the healthcare system and more conservative political orientation, followed by less spiritual community support for community health, stronger beliefs about God in the body, more fundamentalist religious beliefs, and lower knowledge of genetics. The large sample size and examination of a broad array of religious variables alongside distrust and political orientation offer new insights. These findings add to the literature on the culture wars surrounding mRNA vaccines, and can perhaps aid in future efforts to build trust and relationships between public health and religious communities.

Related

  1. Healthcare workers’ knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding mpox in two affected districts of Uganda, 2024
    Joyce Owens Kobusingye, Richard Migisha, Emmanuel Mfitundinda +8
    Journal of Interventional Epidemiology and Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textMicrobiologyDOAJ
  2. Knowledge, attitudes, and practices of healthcare professionals on female genital schistosomiasis in the Mabalako health zone, Democratic Republic of the Congo
    Jean-Louis Mumbere Katembo, John Kamwina Kebela, Mathe Senge +8
    BMC Women's HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textMicrobiologyPMC
  3. Knowledge and attitudes toward antimicrobial stewardship and the WHO AWaRe antibiotic classification among healthcare professionals at a tertiary hospital in Ethiopia
    Tamrat Assefa Tadesse, Sumeya Sani, Melaku Tileku Tamiru +1
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textMicrobiologyCrossref
  4. Determinants of rabies knowledge, attitudes, and practices among secondary and vocational school students in Maha Sarakham Province, Thailand.
    Kanokwan Suwannarong, Kannika Thammasutti, Satitpong Promsatit +3
    BMC veterinary researchPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textMicrobiologyEurope PMCPMC
  5. Which changes in adolescents' knowledge, attitudes, and practices following a school-based intervention in France increase HPV vaccination uptake and intentions? A mediation analysis
    Amanda Munoz, Amandine Gagneux-Brunon, Anne-Sophie Le Duc-Banaszuk +9
    VaccinePeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textGeneral biologyEpidemiology & public healthHAL
BibTeX
@article{solomon2026religious,
  title = {{Religious beliefs and practices, political orientation, and distrust in healthcare predict attitudes toward mRNA vaccines in the United States}},
  author = {Erin D. Solomon and Eu Gene Chin and Kari Baldwin and Lauren L. Baker and James M. DuBois},
  journal = {PLOS Global Public Health},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.1371/journal.pgph.0006330},
  url = {https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0006330},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Religious beliefs and practices, political orientation, and distrust in healthcare predict attitudes toward mRNA vaccines in the United States
AU  - Erin D. Solomon
AU  - Eu Gene Chin
AU  - Kari Baldwin
AU  - Lauren L. Baker
AU  - James M. DuBois
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/09
JO  - PLOS Global Public Health
DO  - 10.1371/journal.pgph.0006330
UR  - https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0006330
AB  - Religion has contributed to societal divides regarding COVID-19 mRNA vaccines. In this study, we conducted a secondary analysis of a survey of U.S. adults (N = 4939) focused on how religious affiliations, beliefs, and practices impact attitudes toward genetic and genomic activities, one of which was mRNA vaccines. The dataset included large samples of participants from six religious groups in the U.S. (Black Protestant, Catholic, Evangelical Protestant, Jewish, Mainline Protestant, and Muslim), as well as individuals who were atheist, agnostic, or spiritual. ANCOVA results indicated that Evangelical Protestant participants showed significantly less support for mRNA vaccines than other groups, while atheist participants were the most supportive. Muslim participants had the highest concerns, whereas atheist participants had the lowest. Regression analyses indicated the strongest predictors of support for mRNA vaccines were more spiritual community support for community health, followed by higher acceptance of evolution, more liberal political orientation, less distrust toward the healthcare system, higher frequency of attending religious activities, higher income, lower fundamentalist religious beliefs, and more spiritual community support for liberal reproductive and end of life views. The strongest predictors of concerns about mRNA vaccines were more distrust toward the healthcare system and more conservative political orientation, followed by less spiritual community support for community health, stronger beliefs about God in the body, more fundamentalist religious beliefs, and lower knowledge of genetics. The large sample size and examination of a broad array of religious variables alongside distrust and political orientation offer new insights. These findings add to the literature on the culture wars surrounding mRNA vaccines, and can perhaps aid in future efforts to build trust and relationships between public health and religious communities.
SN  - 2767-3375
ER  -