A unified decision framework combines phenotypic and genomic information for nonlinear selection in plant breeding
Abstract
Plant breeding traditionally relies on linear selection indices that combine phenotypic and genomic data to predict breeding objectives (also called genetic merits). Many breeding objectives are nonlinear because they include target deviations, curvature, or the joint value of trait combinations. In this work, we develop a unified decision framework for phenotypic, genomic, and combined information and introduce the combined quadratic genomic selection index (CQGSI). The framework separates genomic prediction from the subsequent selection decision and treats nonlinearity as a property of the breeding objective and its predictor, the CQGSI. In simulated maize, real maize, and wheat datasets, adding genomic predictions often improved response and the expected genetic gain per trait within the same objective. Also, we showed mathematically, why the mean square prediction error of CQGSI was higher than the mean square prediction error of linear indices. Comparisons between linear and quadratic indices remained objective specific because the linear genetic merit and the quadratic genetic merit differ in definition and scale. The framework therefore clarifies when phenotypic, genomic, or combined information can support a stated nonlinear breeding objective.
Related
- Selection-aware metrics provide complementary decision-level information in plant genomic prediction
- An integrated fuzzy multi-criteria decision making and mixed-integer linear programming optimization framework for project risk assessment and response strategy selection: A case study of a liquefied petroleum gas pipeline construction project
- A multi-granularity narrative cloud selection framework for architectural meaning-making integrating the PIA model and three-way decision theory.
- Multi-Trait Phenotypic and SSR-Based Genetic Diversity Assessment of Individual Plants for Parental Selection in Turf-Type Tall Fescue
- Sexual conflict, directional sexual selection and phenotypic plasticity jointly drive the evolution of extreme phenotypic variation
BibTeX
@article{ceronrojas2026unified,
title = {{A unified decision framework combines phenotypic and genomic information for nonlinear selection in plant breeding}},
author = {J. Jesús Cerón-Rojas and Paulino Pérez Rodríguez and Osval A. Montesinos-López and Paolo Vitale and Abelardo Montesinos-López and Rodomiro Ortiz and José Crossa},
journal = {Scientific Reports},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.1038/s41598-026-74839-z},
url = {https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-026-74839-z},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - A unified decision framework combines phenotypic and genomic information for nonlinear selection in plant breeding
AU - J. Jesús Cerón-Rojas
AU - Paulino Pérez Rodríguez
AU - Osval A. Montesinos-López
AU - Paolo Vitale
AU - Abelardo Montesinos-López
AU - Rodomiro Ortiz
AU - José Crossa
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/06
JO - Scientific Reports
DO - 10.1038/s41598-026-74839-z
UR - https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-026-74839-z
AB - Plant breeding traditionally relies on linear selection indices that combine phenotypic and genomic data to predict breeding objectives (also called genetic merits). Many breeding objectives are nonlinear because they include target deviations, curvature, or the joint value of trait combinations. In this work, we develop a unified decision framework for phenotypic, genomic, and combined information and introduce the combined quadratic genomic selection index (CQGSI). The framework separates genomic prediction from the subsequent selection decision and treats nonlinearity as a property of the breeding objective and its predictor, the CQGSI. In simulated maize, real maize, and wheat datasets, adding genomic predictions often improved response and the expected genetic gain per trait within the same objective. Also, we showed mathematically, why the mean square prediction error of CQGSI was higher than the mean square prediction error of linear indices. Comparisons between linear and quadratic indices remained objective specific because the linear genetic merit and the quadratic genetic merit differ in definition and scale. The framework therefore clarifies when phenotypic, genomic, or combined information can support a stated nonlinear breeding objective.
SN - 2045-2322
ER -