Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 7 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Frontiers in Pharmacology

Targeting neddylation in cancer: molecular mechanisms, translational advances, and therapeutic challenges

  1. 1Department of Stomatology, General Hospital of Northern Theater Command
  2. 2Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University

Abstract

Neddylation is a ubiquitin-like post-translational modification that regulates cullin–RING ligases and selected non-cullin substrates involved in cell-cycle progression, DNA replication licensing, DNA-damage repair, apoptosis, hypoxic signaling, inflammatory responses, epithelial–mesenchymal transition, metabolic adaptation, and immune regulation. Many tumors rely on aberrant neddylation-dependent protein turnover to sustain proliferation, survival, metastatic plasticity, and therapeutic resistance, making this pathway a compelling anticancer target. This review outlines the molecular architecture of the NEDD8 cascade, encompassing NEDD8 activation, E2-mediated conjugation, E3/co-E3-facilitated ligation, deneddylation, and the central role of cullin–RING ligases as oncogenic effectors. It also examines the principal classes of neddylation-pathway inhibitors, including the first-in-class NEDD8-activating enzyme inhibitor MLN4924, newer NAE inhibitors such as TAS4464, emerging UBE2M- and UBE2F-directed approaches, DCN1/DCUN1-targeted inhibitors, and natural product-derived or other experimental compounds. Preclinical evidence across hematologic malignancies, gastrointestinal and genitourinary cancers, thoracic and head-and-neck tumors, brain tumors, and pediatric cancers indicates that neddylation inhibition can suppress tumor growth and enhance responses to chemotherapy, radiotherapy, apoptosis-targeted agents, proteasome inhibition, autophagy modulation, and immunotherapy. Nevertheless, clinical translation remains constrained by inadequate patient selection, context-dependent substrate accumulation, adaptive resistance, complex immune effects, and limited therapeutic windows. Future development should therefore move beyond empirical pan-pathway inhibition toward biomarker-guided, tumor-context-specific precision strategies integrating selective E1, E2, and E3 inhibitors, rational combination regimens, pharmacodynamic monitoring, resistance profiling, immune-state assessment, and tumor-targeted delivery systems.

Related

  1. Targeting the NLRP3 inflammasome in rheumatoid arthritis fibroblast-like synoviocytes: pathogenic mechanisms, therapeutic strategies, and translational perspectives
    Lunmin Bao, Haibing Dai, Daoming Wang +1
    Frontiers in pharmacologyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textPharmacology & toxicologyEurope PMC
  2. Advanced cell-laden hydrogels for diabetic wound healing: Biomaterial design, therapeutic mechanisms, and translational challenges
    Fatemeh Haghdoost, Soroush Shams, Atefeh Shahbazi +2
    Iranian Journal of Burns and Wound ResearchPeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textGeneral medicineDOAJ
  3. Targeting the gut microbiota to promote motor rehabilitation after spinal cord injury: mechanisms, evidence, and translational challenges
    Zhi Chen, Zhenzhen Gao, Zhiwen Zhu
    Frontiers in neurologyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textNeurologyEurope PMCCrossref
  4. Dietary phytochemicals targeting neuroinflammation: mechanisms, bioavailability and translational challenges
    Kumar M. R. Bhat, Raghavendra Upadhya, Aashika Nayak +5
    Frontiers in PharmacologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textNeurologyCrossrefDOAJ
  5. Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPR)-Based Genome Editing in Inherited Cardiovascular Diseases: Therapeutic Advances, Emerging Editing Platforms, and Translational Challenges
    Tosin Fakiyesi, Mmaduabuchi Ozioko, Oluwapelumi D Ogunseye +8
    CureusPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{tian2026targeting,
  title = {{Targeting neddylation in cancer: molecular mechanisms, translational advances, and therapeutic challenges}},
  author = {Xin Tian and Xinghan Li and Dequan Liu and Ying Min and Yang Hu},
  journal = {Frontiers in Pharmacology},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3389/fphar.2026.1936781},
  url = {https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphar.2026.1936781/full},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Targeting neddylation in cancer: molecular mechanisms, translational advances, and therapeutic challenges
AU  - Xin Tian
AU  - Xinghan Li
AU  - Dequan Liu
AU  - Ying Min
AU  - Yang Hu
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/29
JO  - Frontiers in Pharmacology
DO  - 10.3389/fphar.2026.1936781
UR  - https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphar.2026.1936781/full
AB  - Neddylation is a ubiquitin-like post-translational modification that regulates cullin–RING ligases and selected non-cullin substrates involved in cell-cycle progression, DNA replication licensing, DNA-damage repair, apoptosis, hypoxic signaling, inflammatory responses, epithelial–mesenchymal transition, metabolic adaptation, and immune regulation. Many tumors rely on aberrant neddylation-dependent protein turnover to sustain proliferation, survival, metastatic plasticity, and therapeutic resistance, making this pathway a compelling anticancer target. This review outlines the molecular architecture of the NEDD8 cascade, encompassing NEDD8 activation, E2-mediated conjugation, E3/co-E3-facilitated ligation, deneddylation, and the central role of cullin–RING ligases as oncogenic effectors. It also examines the principal classes of neddylation-pathway inhibitors, including the first-in-class NEDD8-activating enzyme inhibitor MLN4924, newer NAE inhibitors such as TAS4464, emerging UBE2M- and UBE2F-directed approaches, DCN1/DCUN1-targeted inhibitors, and natural product-derived or other experimental compounds. Preclinical evidence across hematologic malignancies, gastrointestinal and genitourinary cancers, thoracic and head-and-neck tumors, brain tumors, and pediatric cancers indicates that neddylation inhibition can suppress tumor growth and enhance responses to chemotherapy, radiotherapy, apoptosis-targeted agents, proteasome inhibition, autophagy modulation, and immunotherapy. Nevertheless, clinical translation remains constrained by inadequate patient selection, context-dependent substrate accumulation, adaptive resistance, complex immune effects, and limited therapeutic windows. Future development should therefore move beyond empirical pan-pathway inhibition toward biomarker-guided, tumor-context-specific precision strategies integrating selective E1, E2, and E3 inhibitors, rational combination regimens, pharmacodynamic monitoring, resistance profiling, immune-state assessment, and tumor-targeted delivery systems.
SN  - 1663-9812
ER  -