Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 23 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYBiodesign research

Sugar 1.0 to 4.0: From conventional sugar production to precision biomanufacturing of healthy sugars

  1. 1State Key Laboratory of Tropical Crop Breeding, Institute of Tropical Bioscience and Biotechnology, Sanya Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences, Sanya, Hainan, 572024, China
  2. 2State Key Laboratory of Tropical Crop Breeding, Sanya Institute of Breeding and Multiplication, Hainan University, Sanya, 572025, China

Abstract

Excessive intake of free sugars is a major modifiable risk factor for obesity, type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease, and it is a global public-health priority to reduce dietary sugar while preserving sensory quality. Referred to here as "healthy sugars", the low-calorie monosaccharides D-allulose and D-tagatose combine sucrose-like sensory and bulking behavior with a distinct metabolic fate in humans and, for D-tagatose, with defence-inducing activity in plants. This review traces the evolution of sugar supply through four stages, from agricultural extraction of sucrose (Sugar 1.0) and enzymatic hydrolysis to high-fructose syrup (Sugar 2.0) to chemically synthesized high-intensity sweeteners (Sugar 3.0) and precision biomanufacturing of healthy sugars (Sugar 4.0). We review the molecular basis of healthy-sugar action in mammalian metabolic homeostasis and in plant sweet immunity, then compare manufacturing platforms, equilibrium-limited enzymatic epimerization, immobilized-enzyme and continuous-reactor processes, thermodynamically driven cell-free cascades, and cell-free CO₂-to-hexose synthesis, through a consolidated cross-platform comparison of conversion, titer, yield, scalability and technology readiness. We then set out an amyloplast-targeted compartmentalised design for sugar-crop chassis, a distinct phosphorylated route for D-tagatose, and a climate-adaptive sugarcane, sugar beet, sorghum manufacturing crops. Finally we examine the conditions under which a plant-chassis route could offer cost or carbon advantages, comparing feedstock, energy, separation and carbon-balance considerations across platforms, and comparing the ingredient and biosafety requirements applying in the United States, the European Union and China. The plant-chassis route is presented throughout as a design proposal requiring crop-level validation, and the prerequisites for its projected advantages are stated explicitly.

Related

  1. Enhanced exosome biomanufacturing, precision isolation, and advanced engineering: toward mechanistic regulation and biomaterial integration for osteoarthritis therapy
    Meipei Gao, Qiaotian Yin, Zejian Zhong +7
    Journal of NanobiotechnologyPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full text3 citedMolecular biology & gene regulationPMC
  2. The gut microenvironment in antibody-mediated rejection: from conventional immunosuppression to precision immunomodulation in organ transplantation
    Yoshiko Matsuda
    Frontiers in ImmunologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textMolecular biology & gene regulationCrossrefEurope PMC
  3. RNA thermometers as temperature-dependent tools for enhanced recombinant protein production in precision fermentation.
    Christina Peternell, Philipp Noll, Marius Henkel
    Microbial cell factoriesPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textMolecular biology & gene regulationEurope PMC
  4. Editorial: Green biomanufacturing by industrial microorganisms: precise regulation and system optimization
    Xiang Zhou, Hongzhen Luo, Jun Liu +1
    Frontiers in MicrobiologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textMolecular biology & gene regulationCrossref
  5. Beyond petrochemicals: challenges and opportunities in industrial-scale biomanufacturing
    Ji Yeon Kim, Hye Eun Yu, Min Ho Kim +1
    Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull text9 citedMolecular biology & gene regulationOpenAlex
BibTeX
@article{zhang2026sugar,
  title = {{Sugar 1.0 to 4.0: From conventional sugar production to precision biomanufacturing of healthy sugars}},
  author = {Zihao Zhang and Junlin Li and Jiahao Zhang and Qibin Wu and Fei Chen and Youxiong Que},
  journal = {Biodesign research},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1016/j.bidere.2026.100125},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/PMC13717879},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Sugar 1.0 to 4.0: From conventional sugar production to precision biomanufacturing of healthy sugars
AU  - Zihao Zhang
AU  - Junlin Li
AU  - Jiahao Zhang
AU  - Qibin Wu
AU  - Fei Chen
AU  - Youxiong Que
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/01
JO  - Biodesign research
DO  - 10.1016/j.bidere.2026.100125
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/PMC13717879
AB  - Excessive intake of free sugars is a major modifiable risk factor for obesity, type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease, and it is a global public-health priority to reduce dietary sugar while preserving sensory quality. Referred to here as "healthy sugars", the low-calorie monosaccharides D-allulose and D-tagatose combine sucrose-like sensory and bulking behavior with a distinct metabolic fate in humans and, for D-tagatose, with defence-inducing activity in plants. This review traces the evolution of sugar supply through four stages, from agricultural extraction of sucrose (Sugar 1.0) and enzymatic hydrolysis to high-fructose syrup (Sugar 2.0) to chemically synthesized high-intensity sweeteners (Sugar 3.0) and precision biomanufacturing of healthy sugars (Sugar 4.0). We review the molecular basis of healthy-sugar action in mammalian metabolic homeostasis and in plant sweet immunity, then compare manufacturing platforms, equilibrium-limited enzymatic epimerization, immobilized-enzyme and continuous-reactor processes, thermodynamically driven cell-free cascades, and cell-free CO₂-to-hexose synthesis, through a consolidated cross-platform comparison of conversion, titer, yield, scalability and technology readiness. We then set out an amyloplast-targeted compartmentalised design for sugar-crop chassis, a distinct phosphorylated route for D-tagatose, and a climate-adaptive sugarcane, sugar beet, sorghum manufacturing crops. Finally we examine the conditions under which a plant-chassis route could offer cost or carbon advantages, comparing feedstock, energy, separation and carbon-balance considerations across platforms, and comparing the ingredient and biosafety requirements applying in the United States, the European Union and China. The plant-chassis route is presented throughout as a design proposal requiring crop-level validation, and the prerequisites for its projected advantages are stated explicitly.
SN  - 2693-1257
ER  -