Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
210,043 studies31 sourcesUpdated 40 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Acta Neurochirurgica

Cranio-orbital craniotomy via an eyebrow incision for resection of anterior clinoid and tuberculum sella meningiomas

  1. 1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, Davis
  2. 2Department of Neurological Surgery, Northwestern University

Abstract

Background Anterior clinoid meningiomas (ACM) and tuberculum sella meningiomas (TSM) are anterior skull base tumors that commonly cause visual deterioration. The supraorbital keyhole approach may be used to resect these tumors but is limited by restricted intraoperative maneuverability. Objective To describe and demonstrate the safety and efficacy of our modified minimally invasive cranio-orbital craniotomy compared to traditional approaches. Methods All patients with an ACM or TSM treated with a modified cranio-orbital or traditional fronto-orbital (FO) craniotomy by the senior author were included. A literature review was conducted for ACMs and TSMs treated by transcranial (TC), endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA), and supraorbital keyhole (SoK) approaches. Visual outcomes, extent of resection, and complications were compared. Results Six patients who underwent modified cranio-orbital craniotomy and 4 patients who underwent FO were included. Amongst patients with preoperative visual deficits, 2/4 modified cranio-orbital patients experienced postoperative visual improvement, compared to 3/3 FO patients (p = 0.43). Extent of resection was similar between groups. Complications related to superficial tissue dissection were less common in the modified cranio-orbital group (p = 0.03). In the literature, EEA approaches were associated with higher rates of visual improvement compared to TC or SoK approaches, but EEA was associated with higher rates of postoperative CSF leak. Rate of visual improvement in our modified cranio-orbital patients were similar to those reported in the literature. Conclusion Our modified cranio-orbital craniotomy is a safe and effective approach that should be considered when planning for resection of ACMs and TSMs.

Related

  1. Dual parasagittal craniotomy for single-stage resection of non-contiguous falcine meningiomas: A case report.
    Mehdi Mdarhri, Marouan El Ouahabi, Oualid Mohammed Hmamouche +5
    Surgical neurology internationalPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-SAFull textEpidemiology & public healthEurope PMCPMC
  2. A literature review of anatomical considerations and surgical approaches for planum sphenoidale and tuberculum sellae meningiomas.
    Mariana Agudelo-Arrieta, Sergio Esteban Chacón-Valencia, Maria Isabel Ocampo-Navia +5
    Surgical neurology internationalPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-SAFull textEpidemiology & public healthEurope PMCPMC
  3. Intra-articular Extender Button Deployment Without a Secondary Incision for Salvage of Compromised Femoral Cortical Fixation in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.
    Priya Singh, Brandon Boyd, D'Arcy Marsh +1
    Arthroscopy techniquesPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textSurgery & anaesthesiaEurope PMCPMC
  4. Endoscopic Endonasal Approaches to Anterior Cranial Base Meningiomas: Indications, Limitations, and Surgical Decision-Making.
    Manat Chopra, David John, David J Cote +1
    CancersPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textSurgery & anaesthesiaEurope PMCCrossref
  5. Surgical Timing in Relation to Visual Dysfunction in Skull Base Meningiomas Involving the Anterior Visual Pathway: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis
    Takakazu Kawamata, Seiichiro Eguchi, Shuhei Morita +2
    CancersPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Epidemiology & public healthCrossref
BibTeX
@article{riestenberg2026cranioorbital,
  title = {{Cranio-orbital craniotomy via an eyebrow incision for resection of anterior clinoid and tuberculum sella meningiomas}},
  author = {Robert A. Riestenberg and Jonathan B. Lamano and Keira Lightbody and Dennis Lee and Jared Clouse and Aden P. Haskell-Mendoza and Orin Bloch},
  journal = {Acta Neurochirurgica},
  year = {2026},
  month = aug,
  doi = {10.1007/s00701-026-06997-y},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-026-06997-y},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Cranio-orbital craniotomy via an eyebrow incision for resection of anterior clinoid and tuberculum sella meningiomas
AU  - Robert A. Riestenberg
AU  - Jonathan B. Lamano
AU  - Keira Lightbody
AU  - Dennis Lee
AU  - Jared Clouse
AU  - Aden P. Haskell-Mendoza
AU  - Orin Bloch
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/08/01
JO  - Acta Neurochirurgica
DO  - 10.1007/s00701-026-06997-y
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-026-06997-y
AB  - Background Anterior clinoid meningiomas (ACM) and tuberculum sella meningiomas (TSM) are anterior skull base tumors that commonly cause visual deterioration. The supraorbital keyhole approach may be used to resect these tumors but is limited by restricted intraoperative maneuverability. Objective To describe and demonstrate the safety and efficacy of our modified minimally invasive cranio-orbital craniotomy compared to traditional approaches. Methods All patients with an ACM or TSM treated with a modified cranio-orbital or traditional fronto-orbital (FO) craniotomy by the senior author were included. A literature review was conducted for ACMs and TSMs treated by transcranial (TC), endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA), and supraorbital keyhole (SoK) approaches. Visual outcomes, extent of resection, and complications were compared. Results Six patients who underwent modified cranio-orbital craniotomy and 4 patients who underwent FO were included. Amongst patients with preoperative visual deficits, 2/4 modified cranio-orbital patients experienced postoperative visual improvement, compared to 3/3 FO patients (p = 0.43). Extent of resection was similar between groups. Complications related to superficial tissue dissection were less common in the modified cranio-orbital group (p = 0.03). In the literature, EEA approaches were associated with higher rates of visual improvement compared to TC or SoK approaches, but EEA was associated with higher rates of postoperative CSF leak. Rate of visual improvement in our modified cranio-orbital patients were similar to those reported in the literature. Conclusion Our modified cranio-orbital craniotomy is a safe and effective approach that should be considered when planning for resection of ACMs and TSMs.
SN  - 0942-0940
SN  - 0001-6268
ER  -