Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,203 studies31 sourcesUpdated 26 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYRadiation oncology (London, England)

Electronic patient-reported outcome assessment at inpatient admission: a descriptive analysis of real-world data for 1423 radiotherapy patients.

4 affiliations
  1. 1Institute of Health, Midwifery and Nursing Science, Medical Faculty, Martin Luther University Halle‑Wittenberg, Halle, Germany.
  2. 2Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Halle, Halle, Germany.
  3. 3Institute of Health, Midwifery and Nursing Science, Medical Faculty, Martin Luther University Halle‑Wittenberg, Halle, Germany. [email protected].
  4. 4Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Halle, Halle, Germany. [email protected].

Abstract

Background

Patient-reported outcomes (PRO) capture patients' self-reported and treatment-related experiences, including functional impairment, symptoms, and health-related quality of life (HRQOL). Although PRO have shown benefits in many studies and are recommended by guidelines, systematic PRO assessment is still rarely integrated into routine cancer care. This paper describes results of the long-term implementation of electronic PRO assessment (ePRO) in the routine workflow of a radiation oncology inpatient clinic by analyzing patients' HRQOL at admission.Methods

Admission ePRO included the EORTC QLQ-C30. PRO data were analyzed descriptively and stratified by sex, age, and primary tumor diagnosis.Results

The sample included 1,423 patients. More than half reported clinically important burden in physical and emotional functioning and fatigue. Male patients tended to report better functioning and lower symptom burden. Older patients reported greater burden in physical functioning, appetite loss, and constipation but less burden in social functioning and financial problems. Global health status showed little to no differences by sex, age, or tumor diagnosis.Conclusions

The analyses showed substantial self-reported functional impairment and symptom burden at admission in inpatient radiation oncology and highlight the value of ePRO for identifying needs early, when patients' clinical status is not yet well known to the care team. At the organizational level, these results can help set priorities for supportive care during hospitalization and support more efficient resource allocation.Trial registration

Not applicable, the analysis used only PRO data collected as part of routine care in the inpatient radiation oncology clinic (see also the declaration of no objection).

Related

  1. A Structured, Auditable Taxonomy for Pharmacist-Identifiable Medication-Related Risk Signals in Routine Admission Data: A Retrospective Medication Safety Audit in a High-Risk Inpatient Cohort
    Hidenori Sagara, Momoka Yamane, Yasuhide Kurata +2
    CureusPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  2. In-hospital events and resource utilization associated with percutaneous-based vs. open lumbar fusion, stratified by admission status: a national inpatient sample analysis.
    Hao Yang, Jianlong Li, Yu Sun
    Frontiers in medicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  3. Unplanned Inpatient Admission After Intended Outpatient Total Extraperitoneal Inguinal Hernia Repair: Precautionary Monitoring or Clinically Relevant Morbidity?
    Julia Michel, Leonie Wesselmann, Fabian Nimczewski +3
    Journal of Clinical MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Surgery & anaesthesiaCrossref
  4. Evaluating Electronic Health Record Intervention Efficacy in Enhancing Inpatient Initiation of Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy
    Sheraz Qamar, Trisha Sindhu, Charlotte Pirquet +7
    JACC Case ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textCardiovascular medicinePMC
  5. Heterogeneity in non-suicidal self-injury ideation and treatment response among inpatient female adolescents with mood disorders: Insights from ecological momentary assessment
    M. Zeng, Y. Huang, Y. Ding +8
    medRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textPsychiatry & mental healthmedRxiv
BibTeX
@article{schollmeyer2026electronic,
  title = {{Electronic patient-reported outcome assessment at inpatient admission: a descriptive analysis of real-world data for 1423 radiotherapy patients.}},
  author = {Maria Schollmeyer and Heike Schmidt and Jörg Andreas Müller and Dirk Vordermark and Thomas Nordhausen},
  journal = {Radiation oncology (London, England)},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1186/s13014-026-02947-1},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42920174},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Electronic patient-reported outcome assessment at inpatient admission: a descriptive analysis of real-world data for 1423 radiotherapy patients.
AU  - Maria Schollmeyer
AU  - Heike Schmidt
AU  - Jörg Andreas Müller
AU  - Dirk Vordermark
AU  - Thomas Nordhausen
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/23
JO  - Radiation oncology (London, England)
DO  - 10.1186/s13014-026-02947-1
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42920174
AB  - Background  Patient-reported outcomes (PRO) capture patients' self-reported and treatment-related experiences, including functional impairment, symptoms, and health-related quality of life (HRQOL). Although PRO have shown benefits in many studies and are recommended by guidelines, systematic PRO assessment is still rarely integrated into routine cancer care. This paper describes results of the long-term implementation of electronic PRO assessment (ePRO) in the routine workflow of a radiation oncology inpatient clinic by analyzing patients' HRQOL at admission.Methods  Admission ePRO included the EORTC QLQ-C30. PRO data were analyzed descriptively and stratified by sex, age, and primary tumor diagnosis.Results  The sample included 1,423 patients. More than half reported clinically important burden in physical and emotional functioning and fatigue. Male patients tended to report better functioning and lower symptom burden. Older patients reported greater burden in physical functioning, appetite loss, and constipation but less burden in social functioning and financial problems. Global health status showed little to no differences by sex, age, or tumor diagnosis.Conclusions  The analyses showed substantial self-reported functional impairment and symptom burden at admission in inpatient radiation oncology and highlight the value of ePRO for identifying needs early, when patients' clinical status is not yet well known to the care team. At the organizational level, these results can help set priorities for supportive care during hospitalization and support more efficient resource allocation.Trial registration  Not applicable, the analysis used only PRO data collected as part of routine care in the inpatient radiation oncology clinic (see also the declaration of no objection).
SN  - 1748-717X
ER  -