Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,948 studies31 sourcesUpdated 47 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0ACS Omega

An Experimental Study on the Quantitative Mesoscopic Roughness Characteristics of Rock Using the Size Reduction Method

  1. 1China University of Petroleum (Beijing) , , No. 18 Fuxue Road , Changping, ,

Abstract

The development of emerging clean energy technologies, including CO2 geological sequestration, enhanced geothermal systems (EGS), and underground hydrogen storage, faces a critical scientific and engineering challenge: the accurate characterization of complex fracture morphology in subsurface rock formations. Accurate quantification of fracture morphology is a fundamental prerequisite for engineering design and numerical simulation. However, current methodologies for fracture characterization often fail to effectively distinguish between detailed features such as fracture orientation and surface roughness, leading to imprecise characterization results that directly impact the quality of engineering implementation. This study introduces an innovative theoretical framework─the size reduction method─which isolates detailed roughness from surface tortuosity. Additionally, a novel detailed roughness index, Ra-r, is proposed to complement this method. Utilizing this advanced approach, the research conducts a comprehensive comparison of surface roughness across various fracture types: different regions within a single fracture, natural versus hydraulic fractures within the same specimen, fractures of identical lithology, and fractures of differing lithologies. The findings reveal several critical insights: First, within a single fracture, the roughness at turning positions is significantly lower than that in positions with a unidirectional trend, approximately 31.9% of the latter. Second, hydraulic fractures in carbonatite specimens exhibit higher roughness compared to natural fractures. Third, the presence of quartz mineral fillings reduces the roughness of carbonatite hydraulic fractures to 69.4%. Lastly, a comparison between carbonatite and shale fractures indicates that the roughness of shale hydraulic fractures is about 50.6% of that of carbonatite, while the roughness of natural fractures in shale is approximately 51.4% of that of carbonatite. This research offers significant contributions to the theoretical understanding and practical applications of fracture flow dynamics, providing a robust foundation for future studies and industrial implementations in the field of resource extraction.

Related

  1. Quantitative Study of Methane Sequestration by Hydrate-Encapsulated Bubbles at Cold Seeps: Kinetic Characteristics and Environmental Implications
    Yitong Zhang, Shichuan Xi, Liang Ma +6
    Environmental Science & TechnologyPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textEnvironmental chemistryPMC
  2. Dendrite-scale quantitative evaluation of solidification cracking in welding using in-situ synchrotron X-ray imaging: distribution characteristics of critical strain.
    Houichi Kitano, Tomoya Nagira, Fumiyoshi Yoshinaka +4
    Science and technology of advanced materialsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textMaterials & polymersEurope PMC
  3. Experimental Investigation of Engine Performance and Emission Characteristics of a Compression Ignition Engine Fueled with Exhaust-Gas-Assisted Preheated Ethanol–Diesel Blends
    Ebrahim Husen Jbril, Menelik Walle Mekonen
    ACS OmegaPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textGeneral chemistryCrossrefEurope PMCEurope PMCPMC
  4. Experimental Research on Two-Phase Pulse Detonation Characteristics under Elevated Initial Pressures and High-Frequency Conditions
    Pengfei Ma, Zaijie Feng, Qibin Zhang +2
    ACS OmegaPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textGeneral chemistryCrossref
  5. Mechanical properties and failure characteristics of geocells: A comparative experimental study
    Yuefeng Zhang, Da Zhang, Liang Wang +2
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textCell biologyMaterials & polymersPLOSEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{dong2026experimental,
  title = {{An Experimental Study on the Quantitative Mesoscopic Roughness Characteristics of Rock Using the Size Reduction Method}},
  author = {Enjia Dong and Xiaodong Hu and Chao Chen and Jipeng Wen and Wenjun Lai and Haonan Gong and Hang Du and Fujian Zhou},
  journal = {ACS Omega},
  year = {2026},
  month = nov,
  doi = {10.1021/acsomega.6c02981},
  url = {https://pubs.acs.org/acsodf/article/doi/10.1021/acsomega.6c02981/5462548/An-Experimental-Study-on-the-Quantitative},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - An Experimental Study on the Quantitative Mesoscopic Roughness Characteristics of Rock Using the Size Reduction Method
AU  - Enjia Dong
AU  - Xiaodong Hu
AU  - Chao Chen
AU  - Jipeng Wen
AU  - Wenjun Lai
AU  - Haonan Gong
AU  - Hang Du
AU  - Fujian Zhou
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/11/03
JO  - ACS Omega
DO  - 10.1021/acsomega.6c02981
UR  - https://pubs.acs.org/acsodf/article/doi/10.1021/acsomega.6c02981/5462548/An-Experimental-Study-on-the-Quantitative
AB  - The development of emerging clean energy technologies, including CO2 geological sequestration, enhanced geothermal systems (EGS), and underground hydrogen storage, faces a critical scientific and engineering challenge: the accurate characterization of complex fracture morphology in subsurface rock formations. Accurate quantification of fracture morphology is a fundamental prerequisite for engineering design and numerical simulation. However, current methodologies for fracture characterization often fail to effectively distinguish between detailed features such as fracture orientation and surface roughness, leading to imprecise characterization results that directly impact the quality of engineering implementation. This study introduces an innovative theoretical framework─the size reduction method─which isolates detailed roughness from surface tortuosity. Additionally, a novel detailed roughness index, Ra-r, is proposed to complement this method. Utilizing this advanced approach, the research conducts a comprehensive comparison of surface roughness across various fracture types: different regions within a single fracture, natural versus hydraulic fractures within the same specimen, fractures of identical lithology, and fractures of differing lithologies. The findings reveal several critical insights: First, within a single fracture, the roughness at turning positions is significantly lower than that in positions with a unidirectional trend, approximately 31.9% of the latter. Second, hydraulic fractures in carbonatite specimens exhibit higher roughness compared to natural fractures. Third, the presence of quartz mineral fillings reduces the roughness of carbonatite hydraulic fractures to 69.4%. Lastly, a comparison between carbonatite and shale fractures indicates that the roughness of shale hydraulic fractures is about 50.6% of that of carbonatite, while the roughness of natural fractures in shale is approximately 51.4% of that of carbonatite. This research offers significant contributions to the theoretical understanding and practical applications of fracture flow dynamics, providing a robust foundation for future studies and industrial implementations in the field of resource extraction.
SN  - 2470-1343
ER  -