Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 31 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYPLOS One

Triage under pressure: Nursing students’ learning and preparedness in a code orange simulation using CTAS

  1. 1Nursing, Brock University, St. Catharines, Ontario, Canada.

Abstract

Background: Preparing nursing students for mass casualty incidents requires more than foundational knowledge; it demands the ability to apply triage principles under pressure. While simulation-based education is widely used, there is limited evidence examining how students integrate established triage frameworks, such as the Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS) and Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), within high-acuity disaster contexts. This study evaluated nursing students’ knowledge application, clinical prioritization, and perceived preparedness following a Code Orange simulation. Methods: cross-sectional survey was conducted with undergraduate nursing students (n = 26) following participation in a high-fidelity Code Orange simulation. The survey included multiple-choice knowledge items assessing CTAS and GCS application, Likert-scale measures of perceived knowledge, confidence, and preparedness, and open-ended questions exploring student experiences. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and Chi-square tests, while qualitative responses underwent content analysis. Results: Participants demonstrated strong knowledge of CTAS and GCS principles, with most correctly identifying triage priorities and neurological assessment parameters. Variability was observed in students’ ability to distinguish between CTAS Levels 2 and 3, with recognition of vital signs as a key differentiator (χ² = 57.18, p < .001). Likert-scale responses indicated high levels of perceived preparedness, confidence, and knowledge following the simulation. Qualitative findings highlighted the importance of realism, cognitive demand, and teamwork in shaping learning, with students emphasizing the value of applying theoretical knowledge in a dynamic, high-pressure environment. Conclusion: Findings suggest that high-fidelity disaster simulations extend beyond reinforcing baseline knowledge by promoting the application of triage decision-making in complex clinical contexts. Integrating structured triage frameworks within immersive simulation may enhance preparedness for mass casualty response, particularly in areas requiring nuanced clinical prioritization. These results underscore the role of simulation in bridging the gap between theoretical knowledge and real-world emergency decision-making.

Related

  1. Psychometric properties of the Persian version of the self-regulated learning scale in clinical nursing practice for nursing students: A methodological study
    Ali Bazzi, Zahra Dizaji, Zahra Mozaffari +1
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textNeuroscienceAlgebra & number theoryPLOS
  2. Perceived importance, self-rated performance satisfaction, learning stress, and practicum experiences among nursing students: A cross-sectional study with supplementary open-ended responses
    Hsiu-Wen Tsai, Shu-Ching Chen
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0NeurosciencePsychiatry & mental healthPLOS
  3. Perceived Crises and Preparedness Gaps in Operating Room Nursing: A Qualitative Study of Training Priorities With Nurses and Educators
    Inas D Redjem, Arnaud Huaulmé, Pierre Jannin +1
    Journal of Nursing ManagementPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textSystems & synthetic biologyHAL
  4. How Are Support Surfaces Used in Pressure Ulcer Care Within Nursing Home Settings Assessed? A Scoping Review
    Jérémy Enez, Marielle André, Romain Pichon +2
    International Wound JournalPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textGeneral biologyGeneral medicineHAL
  5. From skills to smart care: The mediating role of digital literacy in the relationship between digital competence and medical artificial intelligence readiness among nursing students
    Shaimaa Mohamed Amin, Heba Emad El‑Gazar, Sameer A. Alkubati +9
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textNeurosciencePLOS
BibTeX
@article{silva2026triage,
  title = {{Triage under pressure: Nursing students’ learning and preparedness in a code orange simulation using CTAS}},
  author = {Vanessa Silva E Silva and Magdalena Dobosiewicz and Karina Tamy Kasawara and Emily Bot and Sylas Coletto and Rebecca Larocca and Shelley Oakes and Tori McDowall and Dawn Prentice and Amina Silva},
  journal = {PLOS One},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0360652},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0360652},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Triage under pressure: Nursing students’ learning and preparedness in a code orange simulation using CTAS
AU  - Vanessa Silva E Silva
AU  - Magdalena Dobosiewicz
AU  - Karina Tamy Kasawara
AU  - Emily Bot
AU  - Sylas Coletto
AU  - Rebecca Larocca
AU  - Shelley Oakes
AU  - Tori McDowall
AU  - Dawn Prentice
AU  - Amina Silva
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/30
JO  - PLOS One
DO  - 10.1371/journal.pone.0360652
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0360652
AB  - Background: Preparing nursing students for mass casualty incidents requires more than foundational knowledge; it demands the ability to apply triage principles under pressure. While simulation-based education is widely used, there is limited evidence examining how students integrate established triage frameworks, such as the Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS) and Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), within high-acuity disaster contexts. This study evaluated nursing students’ knowledge application, clinical prioritization, and perceived preparedness following a Code Orange simulation. Methods: cross-sectional survey was conducted with undergraduate nursing students (n = 26) following participation in a high-fidelity Code Orange simulation. The survey included multiple-choice knowledge items assessing CTAS and GCS application, Likert-scale measures of perceived knowledge, confidence, and preparedness, and open-ended questions exploring student experiences. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and Chi-square tests, while qualitative responses underwent content analysis. Results: Participants demonstrated strong knowledge of CTAS and GCS principles, with most correctly identifying triage priorities and neurological assessment parameters. Variability was observed in students’ ability to distinguish between CTAS Levels 2 and 3, with recognition of vital signs as a key differentiator (χ² = 57.18, p < .001). Likert-scale responses indicated high levels of perceived preparedness, confidence, and knowledge following the simulation. Qualitative findings highlighted the importance of realism, cognitive demand, and teamwork in shaping learning, with students emphasizing the value of applying theoretical knowledge in a dynamic, high-pressure environment. Conclusion: Findings suggest that high-fidelity disaster simulations extend beyond reinforcing baseline knowledge by promoting the application of triage decision-making in complex clinical contexts. Integrating structured triage frameworks within immersive simulation may enhance preparedness for mass casualty response, particularly in areas requiring nuanced clinical prioritization. These results underscore the role of simulation in bridging the gap between theoretical knowledge and real-world emergency decision-making.
SN  - 1932-6203
ER  -