Mind the Academic Gap: Industry Support in the United States for Pediatric Versus Adult Rheumatologist–Authors
5 affiliations
- 1Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine Los Angeles
- 2University of Southern California Los Angeles
- 3University of California Los Angeles
- 4Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center Jerusalem Israel
- 5Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Children's Hospital Los Angeles Los Angeles California
Abstract
Objective: Cognitive pediatric subspecialties, including rheumatology, struggle more than their adult counterparts to recruit young physicians. Commercial industry often subsidizes biomedical research and supplements physician income. Reasoning that availability and extent of extramural financial support may steer budding academically oriented practitioners toward or away from particular disciplines, we used published authors as surrogates for academic physicians and compared industry support to pediatric rheumatologist–authors (PRAs) and adult rheumatologist–authors (ARAs).
Methods: We vetted authors of publications in the American College of Rheumatology journals in calendar years 2023 to 2024 for US affiliation, subspecialty, sex, h‐index (measure of author impact), and receipt of industry payments during the 2017 to 2023 interval. Differences between PRAs and ARAs in frequency and magnitude of research‐associated and nonresearch‐associated payments were determined. Associations among industry payments, author sex, and h‐index were also determined.
Results: A total of 152 of 199 US PRAs (76.4%) and 567 of 710 US ARAs (79.9%) received industry payments (P = 0.286). Median total, nonresearch‐associated, and research‐associated payments to PRAs were 27% ($5,744 vs $21,030), 5% ($244 vs $4,905), and 0% ($0 vs $270) of those to ARAs (P < 0.001, P = 0.018, P < 0.001, respectively). These differences cannot be explained by differences in sex distribution or author impact. Among recipients of research‐associated payments, nonresearch‐associated payments were considerably lower to PRAs than to ARAs at any level of research‐associated payment.
Conclusion: Although both US PRAs and ARAs commonly receive industry payments, the magnitude of payment per recipient is far lower to PRAs than to ARAs. We appeal to industry and to the rheumatology community to boost support of academic pediatric rheumatology.
Related
- Enabling Responsible Industry–Academic Collaboration in Mental Health Research and the Involvement of People with Lived Experience
- The impact of perceived social support on college athletes’ academic burnout: The moderating role of cognitive reappraisal within a serial mediation model
- Revealing Relationships Between Academic Support Services Utilization and Step 1 Outcomes: A Structural Equation Modeling Investigation.
- Sex of the Treating Rheumatologist and Disease Activity Outcomes in Psoriatic Arthritis
- Utilization of a HIPAA-compliant large language model chatbot in an academic pediatric medical center
BibTeX
@article{stohl2026mind,
title = {{Mind the Academic Gap: Industry Support in the United States for Pediatric Versus Adult Rheumatologist–Authors}},
author = {William Stohl and Krishan Parikh and Anuj Parikh and Sheldon M. Stohl},
journal = {ACR Open Rheumatology},
year = {2026},
month = nov,
doi = {10.1002/acr2.90170},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1002/acr2.90170},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Mind the Academic Gap: Industry Support in the United States for Pediatric Versus Adult Rheumatologist–Authors
AU - William Stohl
AU - Krishan Parikh
AU - Anuj Parikh
AU - Sheldon M. Stohl
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/11/04
JO - ACR Open Rheumatology
DO - 10.1002/acr2.90170
UR - https://doi.org/10.1002/acr2.90170
AB - Objective: Cognitive pediatric subspecialties, including rheumatology, struggle more than their adult counterparts to recruit young physicians. Commercial industry often subsidizes biomedical research and supplements physician income. Reasoning that availability and extent of extramural financial support may steer budding academically oriented practitioners toward or away from particular disciplines, we used published authors as surrogates for academic physicians and compared industry support to pediatric rheumatologist–authors (PRAs) and adult rheumatologist–authors (ARAs). Methods: We vetted authors of publications in the American College of Rheumatology journals in calendar years 2023 to 2024 for US affiliation, subspecialty, sex, h‐index (measure of author impact), and receipt of industry payments during the 2017 to 2023 interval. Differences between PRAs and ARAs in frequency and magnitude of research‐associated and nonresearch‐associated payments were determined. Associations among industry payments, author sex, and h‐index were also determined. Results: A total of 152 of 199 US PRAs (76.4%) and 567 of 710 US ARAs (79.9%) received industry payments (P = 0.286). Median total, nonresearch‐associated, and research‐associated payments to PRAs were 27% ($5,744 vs $21,030), 5% ($244 vs $4,905), and 0% ($0 vs $270) of those to ARAs (P < 0.001, P = 0.018, P < 0.001, respectively). These differences cannot be explained by differences in sex distribution or author impact. Among recipients of research‐associated payments, nonresearch‐associated payments were considerably lower to PRAs than to ARAs at any level of research‐associated payment. Conclusion: Although both US PRAs and ARAs commonly receive industry payments, the magnitude of payment per recipient is far lower to PRAs than to ARAs. We appeal to industry and to the rheumatology community to boost support of academic pediatric rheumatology.
SN - 2578-5745
ER -