Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Kidney International Reports
Response to the Letter to the Editor Entitled “A Critical Appraisal of End Points and Statistical Strategies in the DIDo Trial”
Related
- Hamiltonian Monte Carlo vs. event-chain Monte Carlo: An appraisal of sampling strategies beyond the diffusive regime
- Prediction models for compassion fatigue in nurses: A protocol for systematic review and critical appraisal
- Prediction models for venous thromboembolism in pediatric patients: A protocol for systematic review and critical appraisal
- Dimensionality-induced critical phase transition in stochastic Lotka-Volterra equation: From statistical averaging to systemic tipping point
- Comparison of statistical methods for high-dimensional compositional data from flow cytometry: A critical perspective on log-ratio transformation and differential abundance testing
BibTeX
@article{goffin2026response,
title = {{Response to the Letter to the Editor Entitled “A Critical Appraisal of End Points and Statistical Strategies in the DIDo Trial”}},
author = {Eric Goffin and Clémence Béchade and Aurélie Bertrand and Thierry Lobbedez},
journal = {Kidney International Reports},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.1016/j.ekir.2025.09.016},
url = {https://hal.science/hal-05746232v1},
note = {CC BY-NC-ND 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Response to the Letter to the Editor Entitled “A Critical Appraisal of End Points and Statistical Strategies in the DIDo Trial”
AU - Eric Goffin
AU - Clémence Béchade
AU - Aurélie Bertrand
AU - Thierry Lobbedez
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/14
JO - Kidney International Reports
DO - 10.1016/j.ekir.2025.09.016
UR - https://hal.science/hal-05746232v1
SN - 2468-0249
ER -