Family physicians' knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding complementary and alternative medicine in Saudi Arabia: an exploratory cross-sectional study.
5 affiliations
- 1Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Medicine, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia.
- 2General Medicine Practice Program, Batterjee Medical College, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
- 3Pharmaceutical Sciences Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia.
- 4General Medicine Practice Program, Batterjee Medical College, Aseer, Saudi Arabia.
- 5Department of Community Medicine and Pilgrims Health Care, Faculty of Medicine, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia.
Abstract
Introduction
The use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) is increasing worldwide, driven by cultural, religious, and socioeconomic factors, as well as its holistic approach to health. While previous Saudi and regional studies have explored healthcare professionals' views on CAM, recent data on family physicians in Saudi Arabia are limited. This exploratory study examines their knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding CAM.Methods
An exploratory cross-sectional study was conducted among family physicians in Saudi Arabia using an interviewer-administered questionnaire from 1 August 2025 to 31 January 2026. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics, with associations between categorical variables assessed using the chi-square or Fisher's exact tests and statistical significance set at p < 0.05.Results
Of the 62 family physicians surveyed in Saudi Arabia, 58.1% were aged 36-45 years, and the gender distribution was equal. The majority (66.1%) held consultant positions, 40.3% had 5-10 years of experience, and only 32.3% had received formal training in CAM. Overall, knowledge of CAM was moderate. A total of 75.8% supported the integration of CAM into conventional care, while 46.8% expressed uncertainty about the existence of clear national guidelines. Attitudes toward CAM were predominantly positive: 79% supported evidence-based integration, 82.2% endorsed the inclusion of CAM education in undergraduate curricula, and 64.5% agreed that physicians knowledgeable in CAM benefit patients. However, 51.6% perceived CAM as a potential public health concern. In clinical practice, 79% recommended CAM, with meditation (64.5%), herbal supplements (59.7%), spiritual healing (58.1%), and cupping (53.2%) being the most frequently used modalities. Higher levels of CAM knowledge were significantly associated with recommending CAM to a greater proportion of patients (p = 0.012).Conclusion
Family physicians exhibited moderate knowledge of CAM, generally positive attitudes toward evidence-based integration, and selective clinical practices that favored culturally familiar CAM therapies. Additional research and targeted educational initiatives are required to enhance evidence-based CAM practice.
Related
- Knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding Helicobacter pylori resistance among physicians: a multicenter cross-sectional study in Shanxi, China
- Climate change knowledge, attitudes, and practices among future physicians in Egypt
- Ethical aspects of triage in civil and military contexts: a qualitative research of physicians’ attitudes and knowledge regarding ethics in triage scenarios in
- Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices regarding complex generic drugs among physicians in India: A cross-sectional survey
- Complementary and alternative medicine use for self-care of minor wounds and injuries among a convenience sample of palestinian adults
BibTeX
@article{alsanosi2026family,
title = {{Family physicians' knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding complementary and alternative medicine in Saudi Arabia: an exploratory cross-sectional study.}},
author = {Safaa M Alsanosi and Asim M Alshanberi and Aljawharah Alqathama and Majd Almech and Husna Irfan Thalib and Bandar M Abuageelah and Ameena Manzoor and Ruwaydah Hamoud M Alruways and Yosra Alhindi and Maram H Alshareef},
journal = {Frontiers in health services},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.3389/frhs.2026.1837145},
url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42908945},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Family physicians' knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding complementary and alternative medicine in Saudi Arabia: an exploratory cross-sectional study.
AU - Safaa M Alsanosi
AU - Asim M Alshanberi
AU - Aljawharah Alqathama
AU - Majd Almech
AU - Husna Irfan Thalib
AU - Bandar M Abuageelah
AU - Ameena Manzoor
AU - Ruwaydah Hamoud M Alruways
AU - Yosra Alhindi
AU - Maram H Alshareef
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/07
JO - Frontiers in health services
DO - 10.3389/frhs.2026.1837145
UR - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42908945
AB - Introduction The use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) is increasing worldwide, driven by cultural, religious, and socioeconomic factors, as well as its holistic approach to health. While previous Saudi and regional studies have explored healthcare professionals' views on CAM, recent data on family physicians in Saudi Arabia are limited. This exploratory study examines their knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding CAM.Methods An exploratory cross-sectional study was conducted among family physicians in Saudi Arabia using an interviewer-administered questionnaire from 1 August 2025 to 31 January 2026. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics, with associations between categorical variables assessed using the chi-square or Fisher's exact tests and statistical significance set at p < 0.05.Results Of the 62 family physicians surveyed in Saudi Arabia, 58.1% were aged 36-45 years, and the gender distribution was equal. The majority (66.1%) held consultant positions, 40.3% had 5-10 years of experience, and only 32.3% had received formal training in CAM. Overall, knowledge of CAM was moderate. A total of 75.8% supported the integration of CAM into conventional care, while 46.8% expressed uncertainty about the existence of clear national guidelines. Attitudes toward CAM were predominantly positive: 79% supported evidence-based integration, 82.2% endorsed the inclusion of CAM education in undergraduate curricula, and 64.5% agreed that physicians knowledgeable in CAM benefit patients. However, 51.6% perceived CAM as a potential public health concern. In clinical practice, 79% recommended CAM, with meditation (64.5%), herbal supplements (59.7%), spiritual healing (58.1%), and cupping (53.2%) being the most frequently used modalities. Higher levels of CAM knowledge were significantly associated with recommending CAM to a greater proportion of patients (p = 0.012).Conclusion Family physicians exhibited moderate knowledge of CAM, generally positive attitudes toward evidence-based integration, and selective clinical practices that favored culturally familiar CAM therapies. Additional research and targeted educational initiatives are required to enhance evidence-based CAM practice.
SN - 2813-0146
ER -