Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 3 min ago
PreprintCC BYmedRxiv

Covering all the BASEs? Barriers and facilitators to STI testing among international students living in England

  1. 1UK Health Security Agency

Abstract

Background: The emergence in England of ceftriaxone-resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae, the bacteria which causes gonorrhoea, is a public health concern. Most cases of ceftriaxone-resistant gonorrhoea in England are travel-associated. We assessed the barriers and facilitators to sexually transmitted infection testing among international students living in England. Methods: We conducted semi-structured interviews (March-August 2025) with international students attending a university in London. We recruited students through various university networks and snowball sampling. We used the Capability, Opportunity and Motivation (COM-B) model and conducted a thematic analysis. Results: We conducted 15 interviews. Most participants were from China (n=8) and Nigeria (n=2), with other participants from countries in Europe, Asia, the Middle East and the Americas. Most participants were 25-34 years old and in a postgraduate programme. Two-thirds of our sample had previously been tested for STIs (7 in England, and 3 in their home country). STI language and knowledge were key psychological capability barriers to STI testing, awareness of STI testing options was a facilitator. Under physical capability, no STI symptoms influenced testing for some, but prompted testing for others. Belief in confidentiality, privacy, and anonymity of testing, alongside perceived social and individual benefits of STI testing, were identified as facilitators under reflective motivation. Perceived risk varied based on relationship status. Anticipated judgement and stigma were the main social opportunity barriers, while trust in health professionals was the main facilitator. Fragmented services and poor proximity were key physical opportunity barriers; perceived availability of services and access to free, straightforward testing were facilitators. Conclusions: We integrated these findings into national STI public health messaging targeted at university students in the England. The findings can be used to create culturally appropriate resources to raise awareness of STI-related symptoms and, among those with a need, promote STI testing.

Related

  1. International best practice in the cessation of vaping and non-combustible nicotine use, and barriers, facilitators and treatment preferences: A rapid review
    Rory Coyne, Mengyang Zhang, Linda van der Spek +8
    Tobacco Prevention & CessationPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textPhysiologyPMC
  2. Perceived barriers and facilitators to medical students participating in volunteer services for older adults with disabilities: a qualitative descriptive study
    Tong Liu, Runli Yang, Hui Dong +7
    Frontiers in Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textEpidemiology & public healthCrossrefEurope PMCPMC
  3. Barriers and facilitators to telerehabilitation adherence in young and middle-aged stroke survivors: a qualitative COM-B analysis
    Yiling Huang, Meilan Su, Yingying Chen +1
    Frontiers in neurologyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textNeurologyEurope PMC
  4. Intersectional Barriers to and Facilitators of Educational Inclusion for Persons With Disabilities in Low‐ and Middle‐Income Countries: A Systematic Literature Review
    Yusufu Simra, Shani Omari, Hussein Mwanjali
    Health science reportsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  5. Barriers and Facilitators Influencing Physiotherapists’ Adherence to Clinical Practice Guidelines and Return to Sport Criteria after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Qualitative Study in Austria.
    International journal of sports physical therapyPeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
BibTeX
@misc{santamariaplaza2026covering,
  title = {{Covering all the BASEs? Barriers and facilitators to STI testing among international students living in England}},
  author = {C. Santamaria-Plaza and C. Hörst and A. Stuart and P. Narayanan and M. J. Cole and K. Sinka and C. M. Lowndes and H. Mohammed},
  howpublished = {medRxiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.64898/2026.10.29.26366809},
  url = {https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.29.26366809v1},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Covering all the BASEs? Barriers and facilitators to STI testing among international students living in England
AU  - C. Santamaria-Plaza
AU  - C. Hörst
AU  - A. Stuart
AU  - P. Narayanan
AU  - M. J. Cole
AU  - K. Sinka
AU  - C. M. Lowndes
AU  - H. Mohammed
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/29
PB  - medRxiv
DO  - 10.64898/2026.10.29.26366809
UR  - https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.29.26366809v1
AB  - Background: The emergence in England of ceftriaxone-resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae, the bacteria which causes gonorrhoea, is a public health concern. Most cases of ceftriaxone-resistant gonorrhoea in England are travel-associated. We assessed the barriers and facilitators to sexually transmitted infection testing among international students living in England. Methods: We conducted semi-structured interviews (March-August 2025) with international students attending a university in London. We recruited students through various university networks and snowball sampling. We used the Capability, Opportunity and Motivation (COM-B) model and conducted a thematic analysis. Results: We conducted 15 interviews. Most participants were from China (n=8) and Nigeria (n=2), with other participants from countries in Europe, Asia, the Middle East and the Americas. Most participants were 25-34 years old and in a postgraduate programme. Two-thirds of our sample had previously been tested for STIs (7 in England, and 3 in their home country). STI language and knowledge were key psychological capability barriers to STI testing, awareness of STI testing options was a facilitator. Under physical capability, no STI symptoms influenced testing for some, but prompted testing for others. Belief in confidentiality, privacy, and anonymity of testing, alongside perceived social and individual benefits of STI testing, were identified as facilitators under reflective motivation. Perceived risk varied based on relationship status. Anticipated judgement and stigma were the main social opportunity barriers, while trust in health professionals was the main facilitator. Fragmented services and poor proximity were key physical opportunity barriers; perceived availability of services and access to free, straightforward testing were facilitators. Conclusions: We integrated these findings into national STI public health messaging targeted at university students in the England. The findings can be used to create culturally appropriate resources to raise awareness of STI-related symptoms and, among those with a need, promote STI testing.
ER  -